Advent Talk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

You can find an active Save 3ABN website at http://www.Save-3ABN.com.

Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Brenda's testimony  (Read 42008 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Gailon Arthur Joy

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1539
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2008, 07:55:39 PM »

You have an open invitation to the Trial on the merits, or more precisely, meritless case. We have thousands of documents and e-mails that have never been shared.
An example would be the 80% of the Nick Miller document that we partially released
some months back. Has it not occurred to anyone that there had to be much more
for us to need to know just where Nick REALLY stood these days. You really think that we included the portion by Miller declaring it confidential by mistake? Thanks to PB we
got the response we needed to have Nick demonstrate he qualifies as an adversarial witness, not that this is the only plan for Miller. He has loads of information and most of it is no longer covered by attorney client privilege.

We are preparing for a trial. We gain information daily that underscores just how meritless this action was. But that does not mean you should simply let them walk on a motion to dismiss. Far better to engage and defeat the adversary decisively.

Gailon Arthur Joy
Logged

Artiste

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 3036
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2008, 09:03:20 PM »

You have an open invitation to the Trial on the merits, or more precisely, meritless case. We have thousands of documents and e-mails that have never been shared.
An example would be the 80% of the Nick Miller document that we partially released
some months back. Has it not occurred to anyone that there had to be much more
for us to need to know just where Nick REALLY stood these days. You really think that we included the portion by Miller declaring it confidential by mistake? Thanks to PB we got the response we needed to have Nick demonstrate he qualifies as an adversarial witness, not that this is the only plan for Miller. He has loads of information and most of it is no longer covered by attorney client privilege.

We are preparing for a trial. We gain information daily that underscores just how meritless this action was. But that does not mean you should simply let them walk on a motion to dismiss. Far better to engage and defeat the adversary decisively.

Gailon Arthur Joy

Thanks for shedding some light on reasons behind publishing the Nick Miller letter that caused so much controversy!
Logged
"Si me olvido de ti, oh Jerusalén, pierda mi diestra su destreza."

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2008, 02:55:42 AM »


An example would be the 80% of the Nick Miller document that we partially released
some months back. Has it not occurred to anyone that there had to be much more
for us to need to know just where Nick REALLY stood these days. You really think that we included the portion by Miller declaring it confidential by mistake? Thanks to PB we got the response we needed to have Nick demonstrate he qualifies as an adversarial witness, not that this is the only plan for Miller. He has loads of information and most of it is no longer covered by attorney client privilege.
 

Gailon Arthur Joy

Thanks for shedding some light on reasons behind publishing the Nick Miller letter that caused so much controversy!

No wonder so much blur in an attempt to conceal the importance of this action. It seems like that even of one of two opposed it so vehemently at the time, they really did GAJ a great favor and improved his situation.

It appears that document reveals how Nick Miller eventually became one more victim of being dismissed from the services of 3ABN for attempting to do suggest improvements - and a victim of deceit. 
Logged

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #18 on: February 13, 2008, 12:10:27 PM »

Here is a post from BSDA

Statrei
   
Quote
QUOTE(Noahswife @ Feb 10 2008, 10:31 AM) *
I agree with almost everything here AZA with the exception that life has taught me that the truth does not always shake out.

And people tend to forget that the purpose of American jurisprudence is not to find the truth.
Logged

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #19 on: February 13, 2008, 12:14:16 PM »

So what is the purpose of 3ABN suing? "Truth does not always shake out."

And what is the purpose of American jurisprudence? To show who has the best lawyers?
Logged

Snoopy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3056
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #20 on: February 13, 2008, 07:07:13 PM »

Sadly, Johann, I believe you have hit the nail on the head here.


And what is the purpose of American jurisprudence? To show who has the best lawyers?
Logged

Artiste

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 3036
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #21 on: February 14, 2008, 02:59:03 PM »


We are preparing for a trial. We gain information daily that underscores just how meritless this action was. But that does not mean you should simply let them walk on a motion to dismiss. Far better to engage and defeat the adversary decisively.

Gailon Arthur Joy

Can't wait to see all that information!

Or is there some chance it will all be buried?
Logged
"Si me olvido de ti, oh Jerusalén, pierda mi diestra su destreza."

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #22 on: February 16, 2008, 03:45:30 PM »

It takes a while to study 7000 documents - if that number is correct?
Logged

Ozzie

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 470
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #23 on: February 16, 2008, 09:51:06 PM »

It takes a while to study 7000 documents - if that number is correct?

7000 and growing?  ???
Logged
Ozzie
****************************************************

"Why not go out on a limb? Isn't that where the fruit is?"
~ Frank Sculley.

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #24 on: February 21, 2008, 09:01:54 PM »

It takes a lot of work. Why are these men willing to do all of this, in what to some seem a futile attempt? What do they have to gain by their defense against a huge battery of lawyers, costing millions of dollars?

Does justice ever have access to such huge amounts?
Logged

Gailon Arthur Joy

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1539
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #25 on: February 22, 2008, 07:34:40 PM »

Justice has access to THE HALLS OF JUSTICE from above. That is all we need!!! Good practice for the trials dead ahead against far greater powers and principalities!!!

I am certainly planning to be ready and I think Mr Pickle will be ready!!! We know that The Lord God is always ready!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy
Logged

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #26 on: February 24, 2008, 02:48:56 PM »

Matthew 10:19
But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak.
Logged

Gailon Arthur Joy

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1539
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #27 on: February 25, 2008, 10:52:37 PM »

Matthew 10:19
But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak.

Very appropriate...we have oral arguments on March 4!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy
Logged

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #28 on: February 18, 2011, 12:11:04 PM »

Three years ago. Any further development?

Matthew 10:19
But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak.

Very appropriate...we have oral arguments on March 4!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy
Logged

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Brenda's testimony
« Reply #29 on: February 19, 2011, 05:14:01 AM »

I received this yesterday:

Quote
I have this question: Did John Lomacang, Kay Kuzma, Brenda Walsh, ever apologize to Linda for dragging her through the mud?  Every time I see them on TV I wonder if people such as the above, and others, have made things right with Linda!?  I doubt that Danny ever will.  How about Walt Thompson?
 
Just curious...
 
~e
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up