WHAT?!?
Bonnie, you have been posting his motive and his intent and claiming to know what that was, and what he thought and knew, and claiming that is why you found fault with him every time this horse issue has come up, and been brought up BY YOU Bonnie. Starting with your posts about it on MSDAOL Yet you never once asked him to explain, but were arrogant enought to think you could see and know all about him just by reading what Pickle via Linda produced against Danny?
I don't recall saying I knew all about him. DS has explained what I need to know as far as my impression of him. Don't care about the rest. I don't care about what is for PR consumption, don't care what praise DS heaps on DS, don't care about your comments either. What is with the capitalization of "BY YOU". I never claimed or said I had not read or commented at MSDAOL. Is this suppossed to mean something or shock someone>
Yet never once have the critics and accusers( including you) think it relevant to include anything which occurred between the published emails and when the tax returns (which did not claim cash receipts?) were filed?
I don't give a hoot what the tax retrun says. Dob't give a hoot what was decided after it was made public. Don't give a hoot about your claims of ignorance on DS part. One year of filing income tax concerning some of these issues tells you pretty plain what you can and cannot do.
Now you claim you arent interested in Dannys intent, and refuse to be accountable for your own stout words against him? or see where Bob Pickle has erred?
You really need to spend more time makisng sure you understand what you have read. I am not just now uninterested in DS intent. I have understood his intent on somethings that to me explains DS. Nor have I refused to be accountable for what I said. I don't care where or if Bob Pickle erred. It is DS's little error's of conduct that formed my opinion of him. Take it up with Bob if you believe he has erred.
[qoute]Despite the fact the IRS has concluded their investigation? And you or no other can prove any fault or error[/quote]
I have never attempted to prove any error.
You posted this:
me:
What you do not consider is that after he and Linda both went to their accountants and were informed of the law and what was required that they both learned and did the legal thing as required as he never had any intention of cheating the IRS or doing anything illegal.
You:
I have no problem believing that. Sometimes honesty is the prudent thing even if it is something you do not wish to do. Making public the emails no doubt had something to do with his compliance
Jack
But the emails were posted aka published way after the emails and events and tax returns were filed. Your excuse and justification here makes no more sense, then your earlier posts.
I DO NOT CAR WHEN THE E_MAILS WERE PUBLISHED, I DO NOT CARE WHAT THE IRS FILE READS.
Now are we clear on that, you keep repeating that as if I have denied it.
If you were to find a e-mail from me to John Doe, suggesting we steal money from Jane Doe. You resist and publish that or refuse to comply. I think you would be somewhat careful of your back pocket with me around. I would rethink my foolish plan and asking for your help and never carry thru. Law cannot touch me, God may have other plans.
FOR SHAME!!!
May the Lord rebuke you!!
God will probably handle my rebuking or reward without any pleas from you. Save it for someone that is has a problem with what comes out of your mouth and calls on God to rebuke you.
And may you at least have conscience enough to never repeat those same arguments whether on or off these forums, for you are accountable, just as Bob Pickle is for all you have led to believe a lie.
See, now you are accusing another of something he has not done. For shame. Bob did not convince me of anything, lie or truth. My impressions were formed of DS on C/A, by DS, before I knew it was on Maritime. Also on some issues with LS. One little oops and not very important to others I think is that DS told a little fib to Stan Jensen in this little interview. Pretty staged but...... DS denied that donations had dropped as a result of the "rumormongering". Imagine that. Haven't I read elsewhere just the opposite from him and those like yourself. This kind of stuff, not very important probably to others helps me form my impressions of those I am dealing with or interested in
So much on this forum is like this, where all all those who sigh and cry over all that is done in the name of the Lord which is just so blind and ignorant of him?
This could be flipped right around to yourself, so before I comment, perhaps you would let me know if it is you and your allies or those that are referred to as anti-3ABN
--
absolutely disgusted and ashamed
Your right.
edited to correct a sentence