Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[anyman]

Noooo you didn't. You never mendtioned the name Samantha and your calling Sam "Sam the Man" was specifically to be condescending it wasn't out of respect for Sam or his position. And I never said your apology was any of the things you claim. I don't hate, I am disgusted by your behavior as you claim to be a Christian. There is nothing redeeming in your actions. There is nothing uplifting in your words of fighting and antagonizm. You just enjoy fighting and arguing.

Well it seems as plain as the nose on either face. The beef is this, Snoopy you provided information, available to only you, to Gailon who then used it to attack and tear someone else down or at least be condescending. You are a moderater and you are suppose to maintain neutrailty of yourself when administering this thread. It would appear you had a chance to try and make someone seem dishonest without taking a minute to consider the reasons. Did it dawn on anyone that maybe Sam (and no I don't know who he is) is posting from his home computer and the only email address at home is one his wife set up? So quick to decided that someone is being dishonest. Come on step back and take a breath you two and think about the possibilities. Your so defensive and in pitbull mode that you are discrediting yourselfs with every word.

ANYMAN, you are the one who complained that my use of SAM the MAN was a denigration of SAM, without explanation. I ASKED WHAT WAS THE DENIGRATION?
and went further to ask if there were a chance it was short for Samantha. Snoopy responded with the premise the e-mail was to a ladies account.

I GAVE A PUBLIC APOLOGY and your intrepid and obnoxious deduction was that this apology was an ATTACK AND CONDESCENDING?

There is a body of evidence that would demonstrate that you and the Danny Supporters are incredibly blinded by hate and disdain and cannot even demonstrate enough Christianity to accept a clear apology, RESULTING FROM YOUR COMPLAINT???

ANYMAN, SAM and IAN have clearly gone overboard and have demonstrated a clear agenda contrary to reasonable discussion essential to civility.

May I suggest a visit to your pastor???

Gailon Arthur Joy

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

Noooo you didn't. You never mendtioned the name Samantha and your calling Sam "Sam the Man" was specifically to be condescending it wasn't out of respect for Sam or his position. And I never said your apology was any of the things you claim. I don't hate, I am disgusted by your behavior as you claim to be a Christian. There is nothing redeeming in your actions. There is nothing uplifting in your words of fighting and antagonizm. You just enjoy fighting and arguing.


ANYMAN, you are the one who complained that my use of SAM the MAN was a denigration of SAM, without explanation. I ASKED WHAT WAS THE DENIGRATION?
and went further to ask if there were a chance it was short for Samantha. Snoopy responded with the premise the e-mail was to a ladies account.

I GAVE A PUBLIC APOLOGY and your intrepid and obnoxious deduction was that this apology was an ATTACK AND CONDESCENDING?

There is a body of evidence that would demonstrate that you and the Danny Supporters are incredibly blinded by hate and disdain and cannot even demonstrate enough Christianity to accept a clear apology, RESULTING FROM YOUR COMPLAINT???

ANYMAN, SAM and IAN have clearly gone overboard and have demonstrated a clear agenda contrary to reasonable discussion essential to civility.

May I suggest a visit to your pastor???

Gailon Arthur Joy

ANd just how Sam The Man is disrespectful, if it is a man (or is it them)?

I had a male associate I have called Sam the Man for two decades and he has never taken offense.

By the way, what is his position? Is that supposedly known?

Splain, please?

GAJ

[anyman]

How about you "splainme" where you mentioned the name Samantha as you claimed. And I will help you with this rather simple probelm you have. Your friend, familar, known each other for a time equals a little less formal communication. Sam here on Adventtalk you don't know, not familiar, thus a seeminly condescending comment. And I wasn't even making a refernece to gender just to the fact it was condescending. Hope that isn't too hard to draw the line from point a to point b.

Noooo you didn't. You never mendtioned the name Samantha and your calling Sam "Sam the Man" was specifically to be condescending it wasn't out of respect for Sam or his position. And I never said your apology was any of the things you claim. I don't hate, I am disgusted by your behavior as you claim to be a Christian. There is nothing redeeming in your actions. There is nothing uplifting in your words of fighting and antagonizm. You just enjoy fighting and arguing.


ANYMAN, you are the one who complained that my use of SAM the MAN was a denigration of SAM, without explanation. I ASKED WHAT WAS THE DENIGRATION?
and went further to ask if there were a chance it was short for Samantha. Snoopy responded with the premise the e-mail was to a ladies account.

I GAVE A PUBLIC APOLOGY and your intrepid and obnoxious deduction was that this apology was an ATTACK AND CONDESCENDING?

There is a body of evidence that would demonstrate that you and the Danny Supporters are incredibly blinded by hate and disdain and cannot even demonstrate enough Christianity to accept a clear apology, RESULTING FROM YOUR COMPLAINT???

ANYMAN, SAM and IAN have clearly gone overboard and have demonstrated a clear agenda contrary to reasonable discussion essential to civility.

May I suggest a visit to your pastor???

Gailon Arthur Joy

ANd just how Sam The Man is disrespectful, if it is a man (or is it them)?

I had a male associate I have called Sam the Man for two decades and he has never taken offense.

By the way, what is his position? Is that supposedly known?

Splain, please?

GAJ

[Snoopy]

ADMIN HAT ON

OK - Let's get back on topic

ADMIN HAT OFF

How about you "splainme" where you mentioned the name Samantha as you claimed. And I will help you with this rather simple probelm you have. Your friend, familar, known each other for a time equals a little less formal communication. Sam here on Adventtalk you don't know, not familiar, thus a seeminly condescending comment. And I wasn't even making a refernece to gender just to the fact it was condescending. Hope that isn't too hard to draw the line from point a to point b.

Noooo you didn't. You never mendtioned the name Samantha and your calling Sam "Sam the Man" was specifically to be condescending it wasn't out of respect for Sam or his position. And I never said your apology was any of the things you claim. I don't hate, I am disgusted by your behavior as you claim to be a Christian. There is nothing redeeming in your actions. There is nothing uplifting in your words of fighting and antagonizm. You just enjoy fighting and arguing.


ANYMAN, you are the one who complained that my use of SAM the MAN was a denigration of SAM, without explanation. I ASKED WHAT WAS THE DENIGRATION?
and went further to ask if there were a chance it was short for Samantha. Snoopy responded with the premise the e-mail was to a ladies account.

I GAVE A PUBLIC APOLOGY and your intrepid and obnoxious deduction was that this apology was an ATTACK AND CONDESCENDING?

There is a body of evidence that would demonstrate that you and the Danny Supporters are incredibly blinded by hate and disdain and cannot even demonstrate enough Christianity to accept a clear apology, RESULTING FROM YOUR COMPLAINT???

ANYMAN, SAM and IAN have clearly gone overboard and have demonstrated a clear agenda contrary to reasonable discussion essential to civility.

May I suggest a visit to your pastor???

Gailon Arthur Joy

ANd just how Sam The Man is disrespectful, if it is a man (or is it them)?

I had a male associate I have called Sam the Man for two decades and he has never taken offense.

By the way, what is his position? Is that supposedly known?

Splain, please?

GAJ

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

How about you "splainme" where you mentioned the name Samantha as you claimed. And I will help you with this rather simple probelm you have. Your friend, familar, known each other for a time equals a little less formal communication. Sam here on Adventtalk you don't know, not familiar, thus a seeminly condescending comment. And I wasn't even making a refernece to gender just to the fact it was condescending. Hope that isn't too hard to draw the line from point a to point b.

I specifically asked if gender was the issue here.

And NO, there is no line from a to b, only in your convoluted mind.

GAJ

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

Hey, ANYMAN, I guess we have to get back on topic and I just have to ask:

Has Greg Thompson Changed Camps?

GAJ

[anyman]

Why don't you ask him. But if he is on to your methods I'm a guessing he won't talk to you very much. Seems like he's the bigger man right now cause he isn't harassing you now is he the way your boy Mr. Pickle is harassing him.

Hey, ANYMAN, I guess we have to get back on topic and I just have to ask:

Has Greg Thompson Changed Camps?

GAJ

[Bob Pickle]

But he's the one who has posted, "R P I A L," not me.

[Habanero]

...I am disgusted by your behavior as you claim to be a Christian. There is nothing redeeming in your actions. There is nothing uplifting in your words of fighting and antagonizm. You just enjoy fighting and arguing.

Introspection?

[Habanero]

Hope that isn't too hard to draw the line from point a to point b.

Condesending?

[Donna]

The question has been asked whether or not Greg Thompson has changed camps. None of us can answer that as we aren't him. But we can answer what we think the answer might be from the viewpoints we look from. I have never met him, but through his words and actions, his fruits, I believe I have come to know him. While I do not expect him to be perfect, I do see him as a loving and caring Christian who investigates what ever he sees and hears with an open mind. I do not believe he would change camps. Why would he? Both camps have given their side and to date I have to agree that the 3ABN camp's evidence and fruits are more factual and truthful.

Now before anyone might say that I am judging let me say that I believe we are to judge those who say they are Christians by their fruits.

May our fruits show we are worthy to be called Christian, otherwise we have taken the name in vain.

Donna

[Bob Pickle]

Welcome, Donna.

Could you be specific as to what points you think from our side are not factual and truthful?

Are you suggesting that Danny never did try to convince Linda to accept cash receipts for horse donations to Stephen Lewis' ministry in blatant violation of the Internal Revenue Code?

Are you suggesting that Danny paid full price after all for that house in 1998, and that Walt lied when he said that he did not? Or are you suggesting that Danny reported the gift of that house as income on his tax returns and just never told us about it?

Are you suggesting that Danny lied when he told Linda almost a month after the divorce that he didn't know whether she had committed fornication with the doctor?

And that Danny never blamed the allegations against Tommy on a feud with someone who lived 800 miles away at the time Tommy's credentials were suspended?

The problem is that since 3ABN or Walt or Danny is the source for much of the above, to suggest that what we've said isn't so in essence declares 3ABN or Walt or Danny to be a liar!

=====

Edited out that which may identify who Donna is in relation to another user here.

[Daryl Fawcett]

The following is taken from a post by Donna in another topic here:

Both camps have given their side and to date I have to agree that the 3ABN camp's evidence and fruits are more factual and truthful.

Can you tell us precisely what the evidence and fruits that are more factual and truthful from the 3ABN camp is?

[Daryl Fawcett]

I was going to make a new topic regarding this, however, seeing that Bob posted here first, I have merged my once newly created topic into this one.

[Donna]

I am not inclined to go over everything that has been shown, it has been shown and that should suffice for all who truly seek and want to know the truth. What I will say is that I am not one to be swayed easily. I listen and then I go to pray and search out the truth. 3ABN supporters have tried to always give information backed by evidence which we are free to look into for ourselves. In other words when they share with us, they do not give their opinion of what they think it means to try to sway us. On the other side we find the opposite with partial quotes, their own added opinion to sway us to their thinking and a whole lot of insinuations, surmisings, and allegations, with no actual proof of anything. Just because one might take something a certain way does not make it the truth.