Now last Thursday I did file as an exhibit his post in which he claimed that the IRS investigator had recently had a baby, and identified him in the court filing as being Walt Thompson's son. But how would that be vengeful or vindictive? I didn't say anything nasty about him in the court filing.
Of course, I can imagine that Jerrie Hayes wasn't too happy about that, since I referred to her statement of March 7, 2008, to Magistrate Judge Hillman, where she said there wasn't an IRS investigation going on, even though para. 4 of her own proposed protective order, regarding which that hearing was about, referred to documents produced to the Department of Justice regarding investigative matters.
That para. 4 and Greg's statement suggests that Jerrie Hayes' statement in the hearing was false. But how would even pointing that out be vengeful or vindictive? I think that any attorney representing 3ABN or Danny Shelton must be absolutely above board and honest in everything they say or do, or they should be immediately fired. Supporting ministries of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and their ex-presidents/ex-CEO's should have the highest standards.