If anyone is hiding something, filing suit is the last action they would take. If you have something to hide you certainly wouldn't want to risk those nasty depos and all of that very telling discovery. The fact that 3abn chose to pursue a suit tells me and a lot of others that they have nothing to hide.
Don't be so gullible.
3ABN and Danny still haven't given us document 1 of the documents I requested back in November and December. I finally got the last of the initial disclosures in last Friday's mail. Regarding those they have gone to the extreme extreme of marking confidential documents that anyone in the world can freely obtain. And that, in my opinion, is a violation of the confidentiality order that was issued.
If you read through the property tax case, you'll see that this isn't the first time that 3ABN and Danny have refused to turn over documents. I think he's been doing the same in his divorce case too.
No, they are definitely acting as if they have a whole lot to hide. And the evidence that is available at present confirms that.
Folks, If Pickle and Joy have received documents marked "confidential" then that info is available to them for the case and they have access to it, and it can be used in the case and trial and the truth be determined. So what's the beef?
The confidentiality order was issued by the Judge.
it only means that what is marked confidential is not public information and can't be revealed to the public, or any outside the case who have no right to it.
So Pickle can't twist anything and misrepresent it here, he is not allowed to violate an individual's privacy rights (the donors for example) , or share or make know 3ABN's trade secrets to their competitors etc. In other words, Pickle can't report it all as he wants to..
If Pickle thinks 3ABN is violating the Judges order, than instead of first accusing them of doing so and of hiding things and having the apearance of evil, and further whining about it here, he should file a complaint and let the Judge decide..
Then he can factually report the court's decision.
Make sense?