What does it say about those who attack, sue, finance suits against, or, regarding ASI membership, discriminate against those who are concerned about such things?
One can only sue against those accusations that have been proven to be factual.
Actually, that is suppose to be the case. But far too many lawsuites are malicious misuse of process
An example was the Davenport Lawsuite against Adams and Felts...Davenport was running a Ponzi scheme and the administrators in the church that bought into the mess were violating all kinds of fiduciary duty and violated North American Working Policy. They used a Federal Lawsuite to run a smokescreen and end the attacks against Davenport and the disclosure of the Administrators error.
The 3ABN vs Joy has similar purpose...they needed to end the investigation and stop the disclosures.
They even tried impounding the case so the world would not know or see.
Much to their chagrin, the investigation goes on and the disclosures continue.
But their real problem is not here but with the foolish effort to malign Linda and to maliciously interfere in her contractural relationships.
C'est la vie.
Gailon Arthur Joy