Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Ozzie]

Shouldn't Bluehost be given some type of legal warning for having so quickly and easily responded to the subpeona without even questioning its validity?

Personally, I would have favored crucifying them, but that would have been bad legal strategy. You want to claw back the information and make it of noen affect and therefore the target needs to be the perpatrator and have Blue Host an ally.

Since Linda Shelton has been served by 3ABN, it now seems clear they are unlikely to pursue their effort to serve the subpoena on Black SDA for yet a third time. They will now simply try to get the information from the party they were really after, Linda Shelton.

Best of luck, 3ABN!!! You have opened pandora's box now!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy

I seem to remember a song with a title something along the lines of "When will they ever learn"? 

I can't believe what 'slow learners' these people are.

=====

Edited only to rename this newly split topic.

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

As I do not have any reason to doubt what Bob Pickle said, I am not going to be the one to spend any money on this, therefore, until somebody secures the transcript and shares it with us here, I consider this matter closed.

It would seem that Grandma Nettie's friend was prescient as Linda Sue Shelton has been served.
Hm-m-m-m!!! How could that be Grandma? Have connections do you?

Linda Sue Shelton will now be hiring a second attorney to preserve her interests and to stake her claims against the 3ABN Board members that have haunted her needlessly for nearly four years.

They have opened pandora's box...when will they ever learn!!!!

It is time for Linda Sue Shelton to BITE BACK!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

Yes, I am told that someone called and asked if she was home to take delivery of a package. When she asked who it was from, the delivery guy SAID he had no idea!!! Imagine that, a delivery guy that could not tell you where the package came from??? Homeland Security would have freaked about that!!!

And when he arrived he had a lovely little surprise: A notice to appear and a subpoena duces teacum. If you have written to Linda, Danny wants to know!!! And he wants to read the little
jewels.

Since Linda had already been warned by Grandma Nettie's friend that she will be a party to the lawsuite, this will open pandora's box. Linda Sue Shelton will need to hire yet another lawyer, but she will finally get her due process and will be able, finally, to demand to see all that illusive evidence 3ABN have claimed to have had for so long.

This is just the beginning of a new ERA and a whole lot more action. Get's interesting from here!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy

[Ozzie]

Has Linda had any invites lately to sing anywhere?

Linda has had invites to sing and they will increase with time.

In fact, 3ABN has served her and "Invited her to SING" but not the gospels tunes she is so well known for. At least they are hoping she will sing...but much to their chagrin she does not have much to sing about!!! At least nothing they really want to hear. What is the statement that Marine Colonel is so well known for: "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!".

I would guess it will be something along those lines.

Linda is now forced to hire yet another lawyer and to defend herself. The Good News is this time there will be due process!!! She will finally get her day in court!!! She will finally get to see the illusory evidence, if it exists.

Let's see, what does Linda have for potential torts? Well, let's start with defamation, slander, malicious interference with a contractural relationship, stalking, conspiracy...hm-m-m-m-m...any other ideas?
Why don't we have Grandma Nettie ask her friend if she could add to this...or does she have a conflict? Really could use some help here???

If Linda is wise, she will make Danny Loyalist and 3ABN Chairman Dr. Walter Thompson, Suite-happy politico Garwin McNeilus and Danny supporter and funder Merlin Fjarli rue the day they picked up the phone to call the Walla Walla four!!!

And how about the day four years ago when they bounced her out behind her back??? I wish nightmares on them all. They deserve a very bad dream, or two or three, etc!!!.

Stay tuned as it gets interesting from here!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy

Praise God. About time that Linda had a fair go in all this disgusting saga. Praying for her. 

[Ozzie]

Well, well, well. Fancy them even inviting Linda to bring along her letters. Didn't they realise just what that would do? Well, Linda will finally get her day in Court, and then we'll see the others squirm. 

This is the best news I've heard in ages. Looking forward to updates from our Reporter here.

[Bob Pickle]

Why in the world do they want to read Danny Shelton calling Dr. Arild Abrahamsen in those letters a pile of ****?? ??

That's could be enough to burst anyone's bubble who thinks he's the Lord's anointed.

[Ozzie]

Why in the world do they want to read Danny Shelton calling Dr. Arild Abrahamsen in those letters a pile of ****?? ??

That's could be enough to burst anyone's bubble who thinks he's the Lord's anointed.

Rather amazing isn't it, that they'd want the world to see that?

Maybe, the delusional 'Lord's anointed', might 'fess up before that all happens, to save face? Do you think that is likely Bob or Gailon?

I know it would be out of character for Moses/anointed/Danny/whoever, but it might be the thing to turn on a light globe in his head and help him understand what reality is.

[inga]

If you have written to Linda, Danny wants to know!!! And he wants to read the little
jewels.

I rather suspect that there's be a wee bit of disappointment on the Danny front.  After all, he's looking for proof that Linda is behind all the internet postings!! 

[Daryl Fawcett]

Linda Shelton has now been served?

For what purpose has Linda Shelton been served?

What do they hope to accomplish?

It will be interesting to see what develops as a result of this.

[Daryl Fawcett]

I have merged posts about this from three other topics into this one, therefore, let us try and keep this all in this one topic.

[Cindy]

Linda Shelton has now been served?

For what purpose has Linda Shelton been served?

What do they hope to accomplish?

It will be interesting to see what develops as a result of this.

Frankly I have expected she would be for quite some time. It's my thought anyone who has read the complaint served on Mr Pickle and Mr Joy in the lawsuit should have expected it... If any somehow missed her name being included in that then they should go back and read it again.

If any have somehow missed how many times her name has come up in these forum discussions then they must be blind...

If Mr Joy is accurately portraying what the subpoena is all about than it seems the lawyers want to ask her questions and get information from her related to the lawsuit.

This is something both sides in the case will be doing and is not unusual, underhanded, mean or a witch hunt etc

I think it would be a good thing if, as in many things here, people could avoid speculating or surmising and making mountains out of moleholes, and (or) making threats and issuing dire warnings when not much beyond that is known here.

It will no doubt be revealed in time as more facts are made known and the case progresses.

Make sense?

And yes I agree, it is interesting.

[Cindy]

Why in the world do they want to read Danny Shelton calling Dr. Arild Abrahamsen in those letters a pile of ****?? ??

That's could be enough to burst anyone's bubble who thinks he's the Lord's anointed.

It's my prayer we all answer the Lord's calling and are anointed, for God's people are all equally important and needed to help finish the work... HIS work.

FYI for any who might think Mr Pickle is indicating Danny Shelton was swearing in his private letters to Linda Shelton. and is editing that out to avoid offending anyone:

That isn't the case. Mr Pickle is apparently offended by the word "poop"... Then again he also seemed to be offended by the biblical word "dung" in those private letters which he and Joy, and all the mirror save3abn sites published...

In my mind that is all petty bovine excretia...

[Bob Pickle]

Ian, you have to note, though, that I think 3ABN's attorneys are in possession of an email from Linda from more than two years ago in which she says that she can't break her silence since that would violate her gag order contract. Why then would they think she was posting anywhere and everywhere? Are they grasping at straws?

Besides, any violations of her contract, I think, would have to be prior to January 1, 2007, since there are no stated penalties in the contract for violations after that date.

[Cindy]

Ian, you have to note, though, that I think 3ABN's attorneys are in possession of an email from Linda from more than two years ago in which she says that she can't break her silence since that would violate her gag order contract. Why then would they think she was posting anywhere and everywhere? Are they grasping at straws?

Besides, any violations of her contract, I think, would have to be prior to January 1, 2007, since there are no stated penalties in the contract for violations after that date.

Folks,

I don't have to note anything.

Frankly I have no idea what Mr Pickle is talking about, where he got this, why he thinks any of this relevant,  or what his point is...

I do know the so called gag order expired b4 the lawsuit was filed...as should anyone who read what was in reality a standard separation agreement.

It is also my personal opinion that anyone who thinks that what Linda Shelton has to say about this lawsuit, or that questions ro her, and information from her are not relevant, is either willfully blind or ignorant.

Truth is truth, let's not avoid that, or pretend we shouldn't as Christians "prove all things and hold fast that which is good"

[Bob Pickle]

If you have no idea what I am talking about, why are you commenting?

The suit claims that Linda gave us all this negative info, and I think there is evidence that they want to construe that to be a violation of her separation agreement. Yet the other side has an email from her to someone else in which she said she couldn't do that.