Cindy: As an administrator and a person who likes "facts" can you assure me that the defamatory post over on that site will be removed?
NO. I cannot promise you that. I, (speaking only for myself)
never remove a post unless it is a violation of the forum rules as posted there, and object to other people doing so...
It is baseless and untrue. And if "truth" is Danny he should know that, because this issue was brought up in discovery and was proven to be a lie. So, when can I expect it to be removed?
Well for what it's worth?
1. I talked to truth when truth originally signed up so I know that individual was not Danny as I was personally acquainted with "truth" for quite some time previous to that.
2. I am not privy to discovery info in your case and that's ok, as it is my understanding it's under seal and not to be disclosed. Should you even be discussing it, or attempting to make claims about it which you cannot prove if that's true? especially as you agreed to a lesser amount to settle and to keep quiet?
I think not.3. You can NEVER expect me personally to remove that post. I, personally do not censor info after it's published, What I edit is behavior and
how things are said, NOT
what is said. Previously you didn't comprehend that and that is why you lost your posting privileges. What I can promise you is this: If you can provide proof and evidence that it's a lie,I will attach it to the post, so that everyone reading it will know that, ok?
•note• yes, there was a letter sent. I'm not denying that. However, there is sworn testimony that the allegation was not true. The supposed "uncle" admitted he lied and even said he didn't have a nephew. The supposed "uncles" mother even stated that it was a lie. So care to take your own advice and only allow facts?
So you admit the accusation exists, but are denying it's validity? That's kinda funny really. Not funny, as in ha ha, but funny, as in strange when you think about it. There have been all kind of accusations against Tommy too, but when they are acknowledged but denied then it's called a cover-up..... Are you engaging in a cover-up, Alex?
Accusations are all that are needed to convict and condemn Tommy and even 3ABN by extension, but when it comes to you, you seem to think denying them is all that is needed to have them removed and cause them to disappear. Duane was the same, Dryden accused Tommy, and it was all good, Dryden accused Duane of the same, and all war broke out. Those accusing 3abn believe every accusation against the Sheltons without proof, but since you've helped in those accusations against 3abn, then 3abn's accuser refuse to judge you and Duane by those same standards. Why is that?
You make unsubstantiated claims above:
there is sworn testimony that the allegation was not true. The supposed "uncle" admitted he lied and even said he didn't have a nephew. The supposed "uncles" mother even stated that it was a lie.
I am really not sure what you are referring to here, but the thing is I can't help but notice how similar your undocumented claims here are to what is actually documented in your case. It's ironic and again double minded and double standards imo. There is sworn testimony your allegations against Tommy are not true, Your Father, Mother, and brother etc all wrote the court and testified about you lying, right?
The thing is, I don't believe you Alex. I'm sorry but I just don't. You make empty claims, but the other side is documented.
and we have published what is available on the other site. i have seen nothing to rebut that yet.
Provide it, and I'll post it but until then? Not happening.