Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[~ Cindy]

I have been informed that Tommy Shelton was deposed yesterday, August 14, 2012, at the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center.

"Mr, Shelton, did you ...?"

"I plead the Fifth."

That's how I'm informed it went, most of the time.

I am quite sure you are not in the confidence of those who were involved in the deposition and that neither you or your informant was a fly upon the wall.. Wouldn't it be better to wait and see what comes of all of this and not depend on others who may have an agenda and bias before repeating what they say to others?

[Artiste]

So, Squiggle Cindy, apparently you don't even know who all has been involved in the disposition so far, do you?

[~ Cindy]

So, Squiggle Cindy, apparently you don't even know who all has been involved in the disposition so far, do you?

I am just Cindy, and I don't know why you would assume or ask that.

[Artiste]

According to your screen name, you are "sqiggle-Cindy".

[Artiste]

I have been informed that Tommy Shelton was deposed yesterday, August 14, 2012, at the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center.

"Mr, Shelton, did you ...?"

"I plead the Fifth."

That's how I'm informed it went, most of the time.

I am quite sure you are not in the confidence of those who were involved in the deposition and that neither you or your informant was a fly upon the wall.. Wouldn't it be better to wait and see what comes of all of this and not depend on others who may have an agenda and bias before repeating what they say to others?

Again, how do you know who was and who was not involved in depositions?

You may have made an incorrect assumption.

[Artiste]

Oh, by the way, welcome back, Cindy.  It seems like years since we've seen you here at Advent Talk.

Although we have certainly been aware of your activities at the "other site".

[~ Cindy]

I have been informed that Tommy Shelton was deposed yesterday, August 14, 2012, at the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center.

"Mr, Shelton, did you ...?"

"I plead the Fifth."

That's how I'm informed it went, most of the time.

I am quite sure you are not in the confidence of those who were involved in the deposition and that neither you or your informant was a fly upon the wall.. Wouldn't it be better to wait and see what comes of all of this and not depend on others who may have an agenda and bias before repeating what they say to others?

Again, how do you know who was and who was not involved in depositions?

Actually your original question was about "who" not "how".

So, Squiggle Cindy, apparently you don't even know who all has been involved in the disposition so far, do you?

Yes, I do.

You may have made an incorrect assumption.

No, I did not.  Pickle and his "source" were not there, and his "source" Alex has proven time and again even here on this forum that he plays fast and loose with the facts and is Not credible. It is reasonable to presume that the attorneys who were there would not be talking to Bob about how the deposition went or what occurred as they are professionals with ethics, and Pickle's is not one of them. Besides that, his reputation of repeating questionable hearsay, gossip, and accusations, or of misreporting and misrepresenting the facts is well known by now.

You can continue to imply I am wrong or don't know, but my point to Pickle was that he should stop repeating what he is told irresponsibly and should rather wait for the facts to be stated and proven in court.

[~ Cindy]

Oh, by the way, welcome back, Cindy.  It seems like years since we've seen you here at Advent Talk.

It has been awhile. Thank you. I tend to be blunt, but I promised Johann when he approved me that I would only post here under my own name and post respectfully to  others even when disagreeing with them. I will do my best to stick to the issues, and obey the rules.

Although we have certainly been aware of your activities at the "other site".

That is kind of you, thanks. So many others here claim they read nothing there.

Blessings...

[Bob Pickle]

No, I did not.  Pickle and his "source" were not there, and his "source" Alex has proven time and again even here on this forum that he plays fast and loose with the facts and is Not credible. It is reasonable to presume that the attorneys who were there would not be talking to Bob about how the deposition went or what occurred as they are professionals with ethics, and Pickle's is not one of them. Besides that, his reputation of repeating questionable hearsay, gossip, and accusations, or of misreporting and misrepresenting the facts is well known by now.

Cindy, was your source present at the deposition? If not, aren't you violating your own advice by speculating about who was there and who was not? And, has your source have a reputation for not repeating questionable hearsay, gossip, and accusations, and for not misreporting and misrepresenting the facts?

Do note that, from what I recall, one of your posters, just before things went kind of silent, speculated that Tommy wasn't going to spend much time behind bars at all. That was before Tommy got sentenced at a hearing at which he refused to take responsibility for his crimes.

[Johann]

Oh, by the way, welcome back, Cindy.  It seems like years since we've seen you here at Advent Talk.

It has been awhile. Thank you. I tend to be blunt, but I promised Johann when he approved me that I would only post here under my own name and post respectfully to  others even when disagreeing with them. I will do my best to stick to the issues, and obey the rules.

Blessings...

Thank you, Cindy. Welcome.

[~ Cindy]

No, I did not.  Pickle and his "source" were not there, and his "source" Alex has proven time and again even here on this forum that he plays fast and loose with the facts and is Not credible. It is reasonable to presume that the attorneys who were there would not be talking to Bob about how the deposition went or what occurred as they are professionals with ethics, and Pickle's is not one of them. Besides that, his reputation of repeating questionable hearsay, gossip, and accusations, or of misreporting and misrepresenting the facts is well known by now.

Cindy, was your source present at the deposition? If not, aren't you violating your own advice by speculating about who was there and who was not? And, has your source have a reputation for not repeating questionable hearsay, gossip, and accusations, and for not misreporting and misrepresenting the facts?

I am not speculating about who was there, Bob. It is a fact that Tommy Shelton was there being deposed with attorney's from both sides.  I am not claiming what happened during it either. I am content to wait for the case to progress and for court documents (documented facts) I am not saying "I was told...." You are... Deal with it.

Do note that, from what I recall, one of your posters...

I neither control nor own posters.

[~ Cindy]

Oh, by the way, welcome back, Cindy.  It seems like years since we've seen you here at Advent Talk.

It has been awhile. Thank you. I tend to be blunt, but I promised Johann when he approved me that I would only post here under my own name and post respectfully to  others even when disagreeing with them. I will do my best to stick to the issues, and obey the rules.

Blessings...

Thank you, Cindy. Welcome.

Thanks

[Bob Pickle]

I am not speculating about who was there, Bob. It is a fact that Tommy Shelton was there being deposed with attorney's from both sides.

I think you're evading my question. I asked you about how you knew who was there. You have stated as fact that Alex was not present at the deposition. I want to know how you know that. Are you speculating or were you told? And if you were told, was the person who told you that personally present at Tommy's deposition, or are you just taking someone's word for it that Alex wasn't there?

You see, if what you are stating is really the truth, and if you really are following your own advice, either Tommy called you or you called Tommy, or Alex's attorney(s) or Tommy's attorney(s) called you or you called them. That's the only possibilities I see. Otherwise, you have violated your own advice by speculating or by accepting as truth something someone said who wasn't even there.

[ex3abnemployee]

Yes, I believe I know who Lilly is. The woman just isn't very bright. I don't know how she finds her way out of bed in the morning.

Niiiiice? (not)
It seems to me you (and all Christians -me and Lilly too) should deal with the issues and avoid getting personal , but that's just my opinion.

You are correct. It's just your opinion. Remember that.

[ex3abnemployee]

So, Squiggle Cindy.....