In desiring to be respectful to the office of the Seventh-day Adventist Church North American Division President, I am starting with his name, but the same could be said of other North American church leaders under him: The "big tent" approach brings together such unlikely proponents of opposite beliefs as La Sierra religion and biology professors advocating theistic evolution and the religiously super-conservative 3ABN. The big tent allows them both to coexist in Adventism.
Dan Jackson has demonstrated this by his meeting with the La Sierra faculty, defending them verbally against David Asscherick's and Jay Gallimore's efforts to combat the encroachment of evolutionary teaching, with the resulting scandal forcing several people out of La Sierra University.
Dan Jackson then spoke at a Friday night 3ABN event and is currently scheduled to appear with Danny Shelton, Yvonne Lewis, and some other 3ABN people at a New York camp meeting.
The keepers of the "big tent" apparently waive the necessity for belief in scripture in one case, and the need for moral and upright behavior in the other case.
How long will Adventism last under this strain?