Is that not what's happening on AT when we are bombarded with a line of reasoning suggesting and insisting that a lifestyle and behavior is not a disease and not a choice? That these persons can fill the calling as pastors?
The subtle notion that the lifestyle is normal and natural is behind that reasoning.
It is an attempt to get believers to accept abominable behavior as normal. It's happening right here on this sight.
Perhaps you are misunderstanding what is happening. Alex has not been arguing that behavior is not a choice. He's been arguing that desire is not a choice, and I've been arguing that we can't say that desire is never the result of choices. In dialoging back and forth, Alex has come to the point where he thinks that desire can result from some choices, specifically the choices of others. But I haven't noticed him say that behavior, giving in to the desires, is not a choice.
If you want to read something in the SoP that gets close to this topic, but not quite exactly the same, try 2T 391. There we have described how the sinful choices of the parents affects the children, even infants. That isn't to say that the children don't have a choice at some point, and that isn't to say that what is described is natural. Notice the words "unnatural" and "degraded" on that page.