Advent Talk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

If you feel a post was made in violation in one or more of the Forum Rules of Advent Talk, then please click on the link provided and give a reason for reporting the post.  The Admin Team will then review the reported post and the reason given, and will respond accordingly.

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Penn State vs. 3ABN  (Read 14550 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Gailon Arthur Joy

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1539
Re: Penn State vs. 3ABN
« Reply #15 on: November 11, 2011, 10:59:31 PM »

Clearly, Penn State has deeper pockets!!! Cost of an education at PSU is about to go UP substantially!!!

Logged

childoftheking

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 358
Logged

Snoopy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3056
Re: Penn State vs. 3ABN
« Reply #17 on: November 15, 2011, 03:34:31 PM »

Not only is this guy sick beyond belief, but he's not very smart - going on national television and admitting the things he did.  Where in the world is his attorney?
Logged

Artiste

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 3036
Re: Penn State vs. 3ABN
« Reply #18 on: November 16, 2011, 09:01:27 PM »

I heard on the news that Penn State problem person Sandusky was allowed to continue his activities for 15 years after good reasons to question his behavior turned up.

That sounds to me very similar to the 3ABN situation.
Logged
"Si me olvido de ti, oh Jerusalén, pierda mi diestra su destreza."

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
Re: Penn State vs. 3ABN
« Reply #19 on: November 21, 2011, 04:36:39 AM »

From "Jerry Sandusky's 'make-believe world' ":

Quote
News of the Sandusky investigation first surfaced in the spring. The Patriot News in Harrisburg reported that a grand jury was looking into allegations of abuse, mentioning just two boys. Sandusky, it appears, attempted to do some damage control.

According to the grand jury report, he called one young man -- he had not spoken to him in two years -- in the weeks before his accuser was to testify. His wife and a family friend phoned, too; the calls were never returned, the report says.

Sounds so similar, doesn't it? Haven't Tommy and Danny done the same sort of apparent damage control?
Logged

Artiste

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 3036
Re: Penn State vs. 3ABN
« Reply #20 on: November 21, 2011, 03:29:14 PM »

From "Jerry Sandusky's 'make-believe world' ":

Quote
News of the Sandusky investigation first surfaced in the spring. The Patriot News in Harrisburg reported that a grand jury was looking into allegations of abuse, mentioning just two boys. Sandusky, it appears, attempted to do some damage control.

According to the grand jury report, he called one young man -- he had not spoken to him in two years -- in the weeks before his accuser was to testify. His wife and a family friend phoned, too; the calls were never returned, the report says.

Sounds so similar, doesn't it? Haven't Tommy and Danny done the same sort of apparent damage control?

I think that's what they have been doing at 3ABN...damage control.
Logged
"Si me olvido de ti, oh Jerusalén, pierda mi diestra su destreza."

childoftheking

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 358
Re: Penn State vs. 3ABN
« Reply #21 on: November 27, 2011, 03:02:12 PM »

Logged

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Penn State vs. 3ABN
« Reply #22 on: December 16, 2011, 07:19:36 AM »

Today I read the documents - many pages - in connection  with the sentence of a 17 year old man in our neighborhood. He got two years in prison for talking a 14 year old girl away from a youth party and behind a school building where he thought everything was in the dark. Besides that he had to pay damages to the girl, her parents, and for three lawyers involved in the case.

The parents think he should have served a longer term. This was a 17 year old boy. What will it do to his future?

What about if he had been a grown-up pastor?
Logged

Johann

  • Guest
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up