I have been absent from this site for at least a month or more... It amuses me to see that Stan is attempting to get the writer of "The Televangelist" to lay claim to its authorship. It is obvious from his comments that he has heard the different theories regarding the identity of the person or persons assumed to have penned this insightful glimpse into the life of Danny Shelton---based upon Danny's public acceptance and confession of himself being depicted within its content.The authorship of this document is of little consequence...its contents is of far greater importance. Do I know who wrote it? I know with certainty who did not write it: Linda Shelton. The facts presented in it were not gleaned from Linda, despite accusations from those who insist continued speculation upon its authorship or the primary source for the information contained within its pages.
Stan, how bold of you to pass judgement upon this author, insisting that their name be stricken from the Book of Life. Why? For telling the truth? For drawing back the curtain and shedding light upon the truth hidden behind the carefully scripted public persona of the televangelist? It is neither gossip nor fabrication which is included within this brief biographical work. In fact, much that could have been included has been omitted... The current contents are shocking enough without adding additional details.
So, Stan. Why such a stalwart defender of Danny Shelton? Do you know him personally? Could you swear on a Bible in a court of law as to the nature of his genuine character or just to the minute part captured on camera and broadcasted by 3ABN? Before you so harshly condemn the author of the televangelist; instead of branding this author a gossip and passing judgement upon him or her, entertain the possibility that they are a watchman on the wall sending out a warning that a wolf in sheep's clothing has entered in among the flock. Should the messanger be condemned because you are uncomfortable with the facts you have received? Even Danny, himself, admitted to the authenticity of this report of his actions, although he was not willing to take ownership to every action reported. The author has recorded all the incidents in good faith and there are numerous honest witnesses who can attest to its accuracy---not liars, disgruntled ex-employees or their spouses, ex-wives of the televangelist or others with an axe to grind---merely witnesses to the events included within the text of "The Televangelist".