I think it should be fairly obvious that my question was a bit tongue in cheek. My last paragraph makes the point that Danny or anyone else doesn't have to be a Jesuit in order for Satan to use them to damage the cause of God.
Even so, I don't think it is beneath one's dignity to at times ask such a question.
A number of years ago, a conference secretary told a group of ministers after visiting Cuba that the Cubans told him that the government would try to infiltrate their churches. They could detect the spies because the spies weren't converted, or the spies would become converted and then tell them what had happened. So infiltration by sinister forces has happened in modern times.
I have been in a situation where I wondered whom someone worked for. Regarding others, I wondered what they had eaten for dinner, not whom they worked for.
I don't recall ever seriously wondering if Danny was a Jesuit. However, using the criteria of the Danny clones themselves, I think we have to conclude that Danny really is a Jesuit.
But one doesn't have to be a Jesuit to refuse to resign when caught redhanded covering up child molestation allegations, committing perjury, engaging in unbiblical divorce, lying, suing fellow Adventists, receiving kickbacks from Remnant Publications, engaging in private inurement, and trashing on global TV a young lady alleging sexual assault. One can simply be unregenerate, unconverted, and lost in sin.
Compare Danny Shelton with Samuel Pipim if you will. The latter confessed to doing something that apparently no one really knows about, resigned from conference employment, requested expedited church discipline, graciously accepted the decision to disfellowship him that his church decided upon, and published these things for all the world to see.
So who is really like David: Danny or Pipim? David and Pipim confessed, Danny has not. David and Pipim published their confessions for all the world to see. Danny hasn't even come close.