Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Gregory]

O.K.

[vestedinterest]

It is very possible that the fact he is adopted is a significant factor.

Except that I have never heard even the faintest rumbling of Tommy's son pursuing any sort of litigation against his dad, have you?

[Murcielago]

What it may factor into may not be litigation. Litigation may be just one in a series of unpleasant events. This is not at all simple, it is far more complex than any one person or action.

It is very possible that the fact he is adopted is a significant factor.

Except that I have never heard even the faintest rumbling of Tommy's son pursuing any sort of litigation against his dad, have you?

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

I am waiting to get a letter that was written by the son...great addition to my collection of documents and NO IT IS NOT CONFIDENTIAL!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

What it may factor into may not be litigation. Litigation may be just one in a series of unpleasant events. This is not at all simple, it is far more complex than any one person or action.

It is very possible that the fact he is adopted is a significant factor.

Except that I have never heard even the faintest rumbling of Tommy's son pursuing any sort of litigation against his dad, have you?

[Artiste]

I am waiting to get a letter that was written by the son

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

Will you be posting it here?

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

It would have to be carefully edited as it is best described as "unfit for public consumption"!!! I was hoping it would come into the public record at the trial in Virginia, but that now seems unlikely.

Gailon Arthur Joy

I am waiting to get a letter that was written by the son

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

Will you be posting it here?

[Bob Pickle]

Nothing new has been posted in the case since June 29.

[Daryl Fawcett]

Going about the same speed as the lawsuit was against you and GAJ.

[Bob Pickle]

If they accepted service, I think they have 60 days to answer the complaint. If not, I think they have 20 days after being served. So things can take awhile.

[Bob Pickle]

Nothing new has been posted in the case since June 29.

Same.

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

If they were timely served, they would have filed answers by now...unless they had filed a motion to dismiss. Sometime Plaintiff will allow additional time to answer or file a Motion to Dismiss. In the subject case, given the time gaps I must suspect they are operating on stipulated expetentions while they negotiate a settlement of all claims.

In our case we had the ex parte motion to impound and had to answer at the same time. I would not do a Motion to Dismiss as Judge Saylor had been a reporter in his pre-law life and I feared a pre-disposition to be a bit dispositive. It was just TOO MUCH FUN to be dispositive in the first 30 to 60 days. And Bob would not have had the opportunity to acheive his fasinating legal career!!! And as you can see, when it was dismissed, BY THE PLAINTIFF, we took serious exception!!!

And the training school continues as Bob prepares an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States!!!

So, let the negotiations continue and be assured these guys WILL PAY to get rid of this one...the project to "counteract the counterfeit" is looking a bit counterfeit these days!!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

[Gregory]

So, Bob is planning an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.  O.K.

Unfortunately, Bob will not be able to put on his resume that he argued this case before the Supreme Court as that Court does not allow pro se people to argue cases before it.

If the Supreme Court accepts this case, they will appoint an attorney, who is accredited to argue cases before that Court, to argue the case on Bob's behalf.

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

And the point is???

May I point out Certiorari will be the very first hurdle...oral argument on the inter-district issues will have been clearly established or moot.

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

[vestedinterest]

May I point out Certiorari will be the very first hurdle

Not to mention the fact that there may be a writ from the higher court ordering the lower court to send up records for review!!

[Bob Pickle]

So, Bob is planning an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.  O.K.

Unfortunately, Bob will not be able to put on his resume that he argued this case before the Supreme Court as that Court does not allow pro se people to argue cases before it.

If the Supreme Court accepts this case, they will appoint an attorney, who is accredited to argue cases before that Court, to argue the case on Bob's behalf.

"See, e.g., SEC v. Sloan, 436 U. S. 103 (1978) (pro se respondent argued, briefed, and prevailed in the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and this Court)." (http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/US/528/528.US.152.98-7809.html#fn5)