Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Johann]

Just recently some attourneys thought they could confiscate our property. It was an alert clerk at the police office who warned us of the fraud and we got a good young honest attourney to help us out.

[Gregory]

I think that Atty. Simpson is sorry that he ever got himself into dealings with Bob and Gailon.

Why?  His dealings with Bob and Gailon have likely earned him a rather large income.  Isn't that what attornies do?  They earn income from the legal issues of others.

[Artiste]

If he likes the constant abrasion of Bob's pointing out his deficiencies.

[Gregory]

At his income level, it is simply a minor anoyance.  Keep in mind,  He gets a check for responding to anything that requires legal attention.  In one sense, it is people like Bob and Gailon who keep attornies employed.  Just imagine the income that they have generated for him over the past four or more years!

When this all finally ends, I thonk that he ought to throw them a party, perhaps give them a vacation on island, along with their families in appreciation for the income that they have brought to him.   



 

[princessdi]

Right Gregory...emails, telephone calls, letters, answers to motion, court appearance alltheir individual price...........If they wanted to hurt Simpson a study flow of petition is not the way.......I had not even thought of that.

[Gregory]

Just another way to look at it:  Everytime Bob hick-uped, or Gailon burped, Simpson got paid.

[princessdi]

Aaaahh man!   LOL!!  Well, guys. what do you think?  Care to keep asupporting Simpson in his present level of income?

[tinka]

Hmmm, It seems Gregory, with implying your theory of Bob and Gailon that you support the pew money to keep this fiasco of corruption going??? Wow, it has been quite established that all corruption will come to an end with the greatest loss of all. Eternity. So... just thoughts looking in from outside.

[Gregory]

Tinka:  That is the way it has happened.  Bob and Gailon have served a role that has feathered the nest of Arry. Sompson.  I can well imagine that there are attornies who would be glad to pray to the Lord, every night, to put them in a situation such as Simpson was in with Bob and Gailon.

My comments reflect no other view than that of the role that Bob and Gailon have played with Simpson.

[Bob Pickle]

If he likes the constant abrasion of Bob's pointing out his deficiencies.

Sometimes his patience seems to wear thin.

Tinka:  That is the way it has happened.  Bob and Gailon have served a role that has feathered the nest of Arry. Sompson.  I can well imagine that there are attornies who would be glad to pray to the Lord, every night, to put them in a situation such as Simpson was in with Bob and Gailon.

And yet Simpson no longer works at Siegel Brill, after he failed to get our case finished, and he had a pending motion for sanctions against him. He moved to another law firm, seemingly taking the case with him.

It would seem that Duffy and company wanted to get the case as far away from themselves as possible.

As far as Simpson doing it all for money goes:

Mark 8:36 For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?

According to Rev. 21:8, 27; 22:15, lying is something that will land us in the lake of fire, and Simpson knows this since we talked about it in 2008. It is pretty sad when a lawyer will stoop so, so low as to lie for money, and thereby sell out his or her chances on eternity for a paltry sum. Imagine! Knowingly choosing to give up walking on golden streets with Jesus simply to be able to lie in exchange for money!

Of course:

Ecclesiastes 9:4 For to him that is joined to all the living there is hope: for a living dog is better than a dead lion.

So any lawyer who has stooped so low as to lie for money can still repent, make things right, and be bound for glory, as long as he is still alive. But repentance, which includes a determination not to continue doing that sin, and making things right are conditions that must be complied with.

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

Here! Here!...me thinks we are about to enter phase two, but Simpson becomes a party!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

I think that Atty. Simpson is sorry that he ever got himself into dealings with Bob and Gailon.

Why?  His dealings with Bob and Gailon have likely earned him a rather large income.  Isn't that what attornies do?  They earn income from the legal issues of others.

[Daryl Fawcett]

Who is it that has to pay Simpson for his continued services?

[Johann]

Wouldn't you suppose it is those who are not satisfied yet with the outcome?

[princessdi]

Who ever currently retains him.  Is that Danny and 3ABN? 

Gregory is just telling the truth here.  Each time Simpson has to answer a filing, a phone call, an email from Bob, Gailon or even his client, there is a charge.  Bob, it does no good to quote Bible scriptures about Simpson, when you are directly responsible for creating the environment which allows him to contiue to"prosper'. Tinks if you all are worried about Danny using "pew money" to pay for legal expenses, then the motions an filings should stop and you won't have to worry about pew money being used any longer in this case. 

Ok so I also have some questions.  Bob and Gailon.  Why did you not return the documents?  Is there a point where they ask you if you have any other copies?  Who would have even asked had you just complied the first time? 

Gregory, isn't it kind of expected, or assumed that all parties to keep files on the entire case and it's evidence even if they are settled out of court, in trial, or even dismessed?  I would think so.

Who is it that has to pay Simpson for his continued services?

[Gregory]

Gregory, isn't it kind of expected, or assumed that all parties to keep files on the entire case and it's evidence even if they are settled out of court, in trial, or even dismessed?  I would think so.

The short answer is:  Yes.

The longer answer is more complicated:  1) Often times in an out of court settlement there will be an agreement (order) directing that one or more parties either return documents and/or destroy all copies in their possession.  2) The retention of documents after a stated time is often governed by a judicial order.

Number 2, above, is the issue here.  The two sides each are making conflicting claims in regard to a judicial order.  At this point, it is up to the one side to request that a judge order the other side to comply with the origonal order of the judge.  Of course, such a request would give the other side an opportunity to rebut the request.  NOTE: My wording is not to be construed as indicating which side I believe to be correct in its understanding.