The bible counsels one not to even "eat" with people who are sexually immoral, slanders, swindlers, etc. But Bill KNott's essay seems to say otherwise as does the Adventist Church which is lax on discipline and verifying allegations of wrongdoing.
I've seen the repercussions of "failing" to expel the wicked - immoral one - and of even "eating" with sexually immoral, or slanderous, or etc. people.
If you associate with these people - they are wicked - they will lie about you. This yeast also spoils the bunch - because of the tolerance for this evil and the self selective, self serving lack of discipline within the Adventist Church - much of Adventist Fellowship has been spoiled by this wicked yeast - and is unholy - simply by fellowshipping with certain Adventists you risk being slandered, cheated, lied about, approached in an unchristian manner - and you risk the GC defending this. I've not encountered this in other christian denominations. The Adventist Church is characterized by a malice and wicked backbiting and malicious witnesses and a dishonesty that many of the "conservatives" are only too glad to fan.
This particular "michigan" conference campus "leader" - while he claims to have much support in the SDA Church especially from the conservatives, many I know in my neighborhood and other Churches don't look up to him but view him as a buffoon if they even know of him at all and rightfully view themselves on a higher level than him and an object of his scorn because of such. It's pretty sad when you have to take out 100% financing for a house worth around $300,000 which falls in value and is only worth around $232,000
The man is jealous and envy and jealousy are what drives his "conservative" campus "leadership in Michigan. This Michigan "campus" "leader" applauds "fraud", untruth and insincerity in violation of 1 Cor 5:8. I was so surprised to see that in this section of Corinthians - when the Bible talks about expelling the immoral brother - that is a person who calls themselves saved and christian, yet they fornicate, or swindle or slanders others - this same section talks about the need to expel this person from fellowship and to fellowship in sincerity and truth.
Interesting the focus on sincerity and truth. Yet, this "michigan" "campus" leader applauds insincerity and truth with his endorsements and his slanderous innuendo.
This leader comes accross as low , low class and willing to seek to all depths of being low in terms of the manner of immorality that he would support - he claims to love Ellen G. White - but he even supports tenets that violate what she says on certain subjects.
Fraud is wrong - but not so if you listen to his "michigan" campus leader.
What I can say with this particular "Michigan" "campus" - so-called leader - while he tries to cloak his attacks as being driven by morality and being against "apostasy", his rhetoric is really driven by tribalism and by his envy of people from particular cultures and ethnicities being wealthier than him - this is his religion as well as the religion of some he's chosen to defend - and many who've now latched on to his writings. He's a false prophet - and has a philosophy of demons.
The problem is not so much the behavior - that is objectionable to him- to him it's the ethnicity and the wealth that is objectionable- this is what draws his ire and that of many of the persons in this particular conference who support him - case in point - many of the persons from this same conference, support a "catholic" - who bragged about fornicating with a married person, and never objected to her objectionable lifestyle.