My, how time flies, Sirmizer.
Shall we conclude from your silence that you have conceded the point, and agree that Remnant paid Danny for sales to 3ABN of Danny's Pacific Press booklets?
Shall we also conclude that you agree that these payments were in fact kickbacks?
[NO!!!, Pickle has zero reason to conclude that, other than that he assumes that those who choose not to participate in childish or illogical or un-meritorious or unsupported and repetitious arguments are conceding to him. How arrogant is that? In my bnook, that is exceedingly arrogant...]
Sirmizer,
Your reply to the above questions is unintelligible.
First off, which question were you replying to? No one who reads your reply can figure out what you were really saying.
Were you conceding the point that Remnant paid Danny for sales to 3ABN of Danny's Pacific Press booklets?
Or were you denying that any such payments had occurred, even though Attorney Greg Simpson admitted that such payments had occurred?
Or were you only denying that such payments were kickbacks? And if that is the only thing you were denying, what would you call those payments, then?
Folks,
This man, along with GAJ keeps insisting on calling me "sirmizer" or "surmizer" when that is not my login name here. My login and registered name is: " Nosir Myzing." I chose that name as a reminder to all, including myself... Doesn't common courtesy, even apart from the rules here, dictate he should address me by the name I registered with? I would think so, especially as he objected to being called Robert Pickle ( his legal name, and one that court documents identified, along with his acknowlegment about that) and as he insisted that his other login name "SDAminister" contain caps... In light of this, and his objections to beinf misnamed, I consider his deliberate misnaming of me, rude, and a violation of the golden rule and of
his own standardswhich he uses to find fault with others and demands apologies for.
But moving on...
As I previously posted:
When you start with a false premise , Pickle? Your logic always falls apart.Pickle insists on calling remnant's payments to DS "kickbacks",{ a false premise} but the IRS who had his and others accusations and had all the documents and evidence in their investigation, did not, and does not consider the royalty payments as kickbacks...
I previously posted:
"You made all these accusations before the lawsuit, Pickle. You should have had proof or said nothing then. Since then the IRS investigated all of your complaints, and found nothing... NOTHING. You can't prove what others far more qualified then you and your fellow accusers could not. The IRS was allowed to go back as far as they liked if they had reason to, but didn't go back even as far as all your alleged crimes indicated they should have for they had no reason to. Your continued claims about the house agreement etc and saying well they never investigated back that far are STUPID. If your reported accusations had any merit or could hold water or were even questionable they would have and could have gone back that far, and further."
Anyway "truth posted the following elsewhere and I consider it pertinent and relevant, but understand you all may not... Despite that, we consider the readers and those not involved but looking for answers as more important than those here (who may be biased and partial, and are considered as such by us) so this is quoted for them, and we hope it is allowed and the right of others to consider all trumps what those here decide to delete as "inappropriate"...
Re: Squelching Rumors
Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:10 am UTC
Hello Robert Pickle;
Do you know the difference between "kickbacks" and "royalties" ?
Here's are defintions to show the difference:
Kickbacks: an illegal, secret payment made in return for a referral which resulted in a transaction or contract.
http://www.investorwords.com/2695/kickback.html
Royalties: A royalty is a percentage of gross or net profit or a fixed amount per sale to which a creator of a work is entitled which is agreed upon in a contract between the creator and the manufacturer, publisher, agent and/or distributor.
http://definitions.uslegal.com/r/royalties/
Danny Shelton received a set royalty payment from the sale of his books. And why not--most people get paid for their work. This was an agreed upon contract with Remnant Publishing.
Re: Squelching Rumors
Wed Aug 10, 2011 5:35 pm UTC
So what happens in a IRS criminal investigation? Please read below:
What Happens In IRS Criminal Prosecutions
You'll know you have IRS issues if you open your door and the person identifies himself as a special agent from the Criminal Investigation Division or CID. Special Enforcement and General Enforcement are 2 arms of the IRS police department. Special Enforcement investigates organized crime, drugs, and unions. General Enforcement gets common taxpayers and others.
You do not really have to be the one under investigation to be contacted by the CID. It could be anybody you know. Do not lie and be careful with dealing with the CID as 80% of all crimes are prosecuted through their thorough investigation and you may unwittingly lead them back to you.
If you are the person being investigated, do not answer any queries from the CID. Contact your lawyer right away as soon as they are gone. Don't seek information about the investigation from the IRS. Let your lawyer contact them.
If the CID can prove your guilt without a doubt, you can be prosecuted. Otherwise, you may get away with civil penalties.
You would be investigated because you:
filed a false tax return.
failed to file a tax return.
evaded taxes.
If the CID recommends prosecution, an assistant U.S. Attorney General from the Justice Department will review and take your case. If the IRS seeks a federal grand jury indictment against you, you'll be formally charged and ordered to go before a federal judge or be arrested. You can plea not guilty or guilty, and possibly be released on your own recognizance or post bail.
The case will go to trial when you plead not guilty. It might be with a judge or a full jury. The IRS must give evidence that you are guilty of the crimes as charged, beyond a reasonable doubt. You will be incarcerated in a federal prison if convicted of a tax crime. If you end up reaching a plea bargain you'll probably just be fined and/or put on probation, given home confinement, or ordered to stay in a halfway house. Prosecution costs will have to be paid by you. The average time you will serve for a tax crime is 2 years.
Link: http://getirshelp.com/what-happens-in-i ... utions.htm
So people--did Danny Shelton go to trial? no. Did the IRS find anything in which to charge 3ABN with? No. Was DS or 3ABN put in a federal prison? No--you're still seeing him on TV. Was a plea deal reached? No. Were they fined? no. Civil penalties? No. Was he given home confinement or ordered to stay in a halfway house? NO NO NO!!!
What part of NO do some not understand?
...later taters....