Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Johann]

I have posted this on the other site:

Linda Shelton and Dr. Arild Abrahamsen can thank Cindy Conard for providing a site where this notarized account by Brenda Welsh on Cindy's website could be posted. This posting makes the seven year old tale still current. Dr. Abrahamsen and Linda are now getting a top notch go-getter of a lawyer to aid them in suing Brenda for all the miseries Brenda has caused them during these seven years by her fraudulent tales.

Other witnesses also noticed how Brenda made a number of improper and flirting advances at Dr. Abrahamsen during their stay in Norway, later projecting her own behavior on Linda. Perhaps Brenda felt she was far enough from home to behave like that and get away with it. Besides that she had been separated from her own husband for several months at some time prior to this.

Dr. Abrahamsen reports how he had to lock his own bedroom door to keep Brenda out of there. Brenda still tried to wake the Doctor up so she could get access to his bedroom.  Although Dr. Abrahamsen did not respond to Brenda's advances he was fully awake and knew what was going on. Later Brenda adjusted the tales of her own behavior as if Linda had been in his bedroom.

When Brenda discovered she could not have her way with Dr. Abrahamsen she seemed disappointed and therefore tried to give Linda the fault.

Seems like Brenda's thwarted account was just what Danny Shelton needed to get rid of Linda.

If Brenda wants to make up before she gets a notification from a lawyer she had better hurry up. That may save her a lot of difficulties that she had never envisioned. But Brenda does not need to make any contact unless she is willing to confess and also try to convince Cindy and others that their accusations have been based on false premises as far as she is concerned.

Justice may take time, but a day of reckoning comes to all of us. Brenda better take care of this before her final destiny is decided! If nothing else helps, Linda Shelton and Dr. Arild Abrahamsen are prepared to let the best lawyer available help her make that decision in front of a judge and/or jury, if that is the only way she will make things right.

And thank you for posting that notarized account of Brenda's tales. It is too late to delete it now.
It appears like you people have access to Brenda, so I make you responsible for getting this message to her immediately.

Johann Thorvaldsson

[Bob Pickle]

So Johann, is Linda demanding that Brenda apologize for and retract her accusation that Linda had gotten an abortion even before Arild came along? In other words, that Linda cheated on Danny multiple times?

There's a recording somewhere of Brenda making all sorts of claims like that.

[Johann]

So Johann, is Linda demanding that Brenda apologize for and retract her accusation that Linda had gotten an abortion even before Arild came along? In other words, that Linda cheated on Danny multiple times?

There's a recording somewhere of Brenda making all sorts of claims like that.

I have never heard of that before. Is the recording available?

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

YES...wanna hear it!!!

Oh, by the way...WAY LONG PAST DUE!!!!

Here, Here!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

[Johann]

How silly and ridiculous is this?!?!? Linda is all the sudden with the Doctor gonna jump up and sue Brenda Walsh when for years Joy, Pickle and co. have been trying to get her to sue anyone and everyone, including Brenda Walsh for telling on her and she didn't want to go to court about it? I'm sorry but I really don't buy that.

Plus... you forgot I think. Linda and her friends published this all over the internet also:
"I am asking, no demanding, that the information be made public at my request! Cast aside those pretended desires to "spare me"! The world is waiting with baited breath!"


Johann, in my opinion you should really try to gather some facts or even ask a question or two before you run off and tell tales, and try to stir up trouble and issue threats.

I have no intention of deleting the post with the quoted excerpt from the notarized statement. A statement which was not made nor notarized by Brenda Walsh as you claim It is here say actually and notarized by Ida Smith. The excerpt was copy and pasted from where the complete statement is published online for all to see by your buddies, Bob Pickle and Gailon Joy. I seem to recall it was posted on BSDA as well... It is not new and has been in the public domain for quite some time and still is thanks to Pickle.

As for your story about Brenda above? .. .for shame. On you.

[Johann]

Why shame on me? I think everything you write here encourages them to do now what they probably should have done a few years back. Yes, shame on me, that I did not encourage them to do that a long time ago. Unfortunately it was not until they read your posts here that challenged them to seek a good lawyer to vindicate themselves. Thank you for that, Cindy. It could also be my fault that I have not been sharing with them before all that you have been posting. Yes, I agree with you: Shame on me!

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

May I restate that as Shame on Linda for letting this go on for so long unchallenged. We had this story in 2006 and since then have accumulated statements, recordings and watched in frustration as we had agreed to hold back the winds of strife on this subject.

It is very much about time that they take a stand and unleash the furies against this den of prevaricators that have largely built a reputation at Linda Sue Shelton's expense.

Now, FOLLOW THROUGH on it and we WILL HAVE THE SATISFACTION OF A FINAL CHAPTER IN VICTORY!!!

And Cindy can cry in her soup!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

[Adam]

Why shame on me? I think everything you write here encourages them to do now what they probably should have done a few years back. Yes, shame on me, that I did not encourage them to do that a long time ago. Unfortunately it was not until they read your posts here that challenged them to seek a good lawyer to vindicate themselves. Thank you for that, Cindy. It could also be my fault that I have not been sharing with them before all that you have been posting. Yes, I agree with you: Shame on me!

Yes, Shame on you Pastor Johann, for standing up for what is right!!! And Cindy Conard shame on you for having your head in the stand or stuck up Danny's re.......ER. please where the sun don't shine!!!!

[Johann]

I posted this on the other site:

As far as I recall Linda readily forgave Brenda 7 years ago when she came to her and confessed she'd told Danny some tales about Linda from the trip to Norway. I think Linda believes in the 7x70 principle and that might be one reason Linda herself has left Brenda alone for those seven years. I don't think she wants to be the main person in this court case.

But Brenda never asked Dr. Arild Abrahamsen to forgive her, and that is why he no longer wants to wait for her confession since her tales are still being posted. It seems like he now is ready to look her straight in the eyes and have a competent lawyer with him. When you know that truth is on your side you can look straight in the face of other people without fear.

[Snoopy]

I posted this on the other site:

As far as I recall Linda readily forgave Brenda 7 years ago when she came to her and confessed she'd told Danny some tales about Linda from the trip to Norway. I think Linda believes in the 7x70 principle and that might be one reason Linda herself has left Brenda alone for those seven years. I don't think she wants to be the main person in this court case.

But Brenda never asked Dr. Arild Abrahamsen to forgive her, and that is why he no longer wants to wait for her confession since her tales are still being posted. It seems like he now is ready to look her straight in the eyes and have a competent lawyer with him. When you know that truth is on your side you can look straight in the face of other people without fear.

So it was a recent posting on Cindy's smut site that prompted renewed interest in litigation against Brenda Walsh on the part of Dr. A - am I understanding you correctly?

[Johann]

So it was a recent posting on Cindy's smut site that prompted renewed interest in litigation against Brenda Walsh on the part of Dr. A - am I understanding you correctly?

For which I am grateful! This cannot go on forever.

[Snoopy]

So it was a recent posting on Cindy's smut site that prompted renewed interest in litigation against Brenda Walsh on the part of Dr. A - am I understanding you correctly?

For which I am grateful! This cannot go on forever.

I agree!

Do we know who Ida Smith is?

[childoftheking]

She was the lady Brenda talked to on the phone about the tickets.

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

She was the lady Brenda talked to on the phone about the tickets.

Do we have the entire statement?

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

[childoftheking]

I have read it I thought it was on 3abn v joy. When I googled for it I found this reference:

www.3abnvjoy.com/1st-cir-08-2457/1st-cir-08-2457-joint-appendix.pdf

It must be in there somewhere. Since I have dial up and I am not even sure this pdf was loading for me-if it was loading it seemed to be taking forever-I will just give this reference and you can check. Do you remember?