The fact remains that you all had all confidence in Danny's[and Linda's] appointing and anointing by God to establish 3ABN, not only as a ministry, but a treasured and sacred SDA ministry. It was not until you found out that Danny had "faults", that you questioned him, after 20 years.
God's anointing nor His appointment are never a mistake or wrong. He clearly understands that He choses to deal with flawed man in His plans for the earth. Man always has free will, even within that anointing and appointment to the cause of God. We don't always make the right choices. That doesn't mean that God didn't make the right choice. i am almost positive if we all lived in the midst of David's mess, you all would also be questioning his anointing and appointment as king.
So my final question to you all is, are you questioning God's choice based on the fact that Danny sinned. Or God could not have chosen Danny based on the fact that his sinned? If so, do you believe David was any less anointed and appointed by mistake.....because he sinned? Don't like the Analogy to David. let's try Adam and Eve. How much more chosen, appoint anointed can you get than to be created with God's own hands to begin the race of man, and the results? How about Noah? What a mighty task he was given, and at the end the first thing he does is plant a vineyard, make wine, get seriously drunk, and cuss out his own son. Was that choice a mistake?
I know some things come a bit slowly here, mainly because you all aren't really tryna' here this. ALL of those mentioned above have two things in common. First, they were anointed(appointed, chosen, set aside) to do a great task for God. Secondly, they all "fell" in the course of accomplishing that task. What you all have to decide is if you want to say that God made a mistake in His choice. OR that God would never, ever choose anyone who would sin. Simple question.