Click Here to Enter Maritime SDA OnLine.
What they seem to have trouble comprehending is that Alex owes them no proof . Liars are not entitled to explanations.
Ok so, I can see refuting anything anyone says that is not truthful........However, I have to ask....christians..........is it at all a good thing to attack her personally. Sure attack her "facts" or lack thereof, but what about keeping the personal attacks to a minimum of....let's say........zero. Lest you all think I have comprehension issues. I totally understand what happened to you all was an extreme personal tragedy, and I have also expressed that each time the "other side" denies the truth or even torments you all for coming forward, they victimze you over again. I also want cindy and her group to understand how personal it is for them to continue to live in denial of TS guilt. It also doesn't help him......some intervention is needed for him to get some help. From the outside, it seems that they are just trying to "control his enviroment" which is no real solution. So I am asking everyone, both sides, to to reconsider the personal attacks.
Di, I agree with you. Name calling doesn't get anyone anywhere, but further victimization of the innocent goes beyond just supporting Tommy, it links them with Tommy's crime: what Tommy did physically and psychologically to his victims Cindy and Co. are now doing emotionally. They ridicule and torment Tommy's victims, call them liars and attempt to humiliate them publically. Tommy has admitted guilt, more victims are coming forward. It is time for Cindy and Co. to smell the coffee and come back to reality, they are not helping Tommy by attacking his victims.Di, Tommy has been in therapy and we both know how unsuccessful that is for molesters. At this point incarceration is probably the only answer for his crimes, if he is convicted. Obviously, Tommy needs to be removed from the society of male children and teenagers. The actions of is family give the appearance of condoning his behaviour, through their slackness of limiting his association with children and failing to admit his crimes against them. When a man will adopt a male child and molest that child and other male children entrusted to his care, his family needs to realize it is not behaviour that can be excused and covered over, allowing him to continue with more victims in another location.Sister
So I responded to Cindy by saying:Then be an example to the rest of us and post yours!Then she permanently bans me. As if I care? The point is Cindy demands proof of allegations, but is not will to do so herself. Why be an admin and tell people they have to follow rules when she is not willing to do so herself? That goes to prove that Cindy is not only a hypocrite but two faced.- - -
Quote from: Alex L. Walker on September 02, 2010, 05:12:49 PMSo I responded to Cindy by saying:Then be an example to the rest of us and post yours!Then she permanently bans me. As if I care? The point is Cindy demands proof of allegations, but is not will to do so herself. Why be an admin and tell people they have to follow rules when she is not willing to do so herself? That goes to prove that Cindy is not only a hypocrite but two faced.- - -
Really? At that time this site wasn't being ran like it is now. Now, it is being ran identical if not worse.
Author
Topic: Cindy Conard proves she is two faced (Read 18892 times)
