There has been NO attempted Witness Tampering
Post by Pat Williams » Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:53 am UTC
You would be hard pressed to prove that, and you have refused to try, from what I recall.
I am back from my hiatus/mandatory vacation here, and am admittedly attempting to play catch up, but this is a strange accusation to me. If you are accusing people of witness tampering, Mr Pickle, then the burden of proof is on you.
Why evade the point? Pat stated unequivocally that there was no attempted witness tampering going on, and I asked if that meant that Brad, Trent, Brenda, and/or Danny had not contacted or attempted to contact Alex in order to try to persuade him to drop charges. If that's what Pat meant, then he/she should back up what he/she said. But I don't think that's possible.
Brad doesn't believe Alex, ....
How do you know that Brad doesn't believe Alex? How do you know? Even if he were to say that he doesn't believe Alex, how do you know that he doesn't?
How do I know? Brad is known to those "who know him" by his character and his actions and words as a good man, and despite Adam's accusations and the posts here, he isn't known as a liar by any who know him.
Does Brad deny that he has ever been unfaithful to his wife? I would be glad to have the rumor against him refuted that he was caught having an affair. Not every rumor is true, and it would be great if that rumor was false.
However, if that rumor is true, then it cannot be said that Brad is a good man, and that he is honest. He made vows before God that he would be true to his wife, and if he violated those vows his trustworthiness is in doubt.
I repeat: I hope that that rumor is not true at all. On the other hand, if Brad tried to persuade Alex to let a sexual predator and a pedophile off the hook, then Brad has lost his moral compass, in my opinion.
By the way, did Tommy ever make advances toward Brad?
But even if he hadn't answered the questions caused by Alex's friend, Adam's attacks of him, and your own here on this forum?? The fact that Alex questioned and implied then outright posted here, that he thought Sam was Brad, and the fact that his friend Adam (who is in his confidence), came on here and asked Pat: " If Sam isn't Brad, are you?" should cause any rational logical person to understand that they both understand that Brad doesn't believe Alex, otherwise they would have no reason to falsely surmise that Sam, and or Pat ( who don't believe Alex) are Brad, or even imply or ask that Those who comprehend that can see that this is just a facetious argument being made by you to discredit and undermine those you are attacking.
You've missed the point entirely. Danny has known for a long time that Tommy is a sexual predator and a pedophile. That hasn't kept Danny from using unethical means to defend Tommy. If Danny can do that, then theoretically others could too. Thus, just because Brad allegedly tried to persuade Alex to drop charges doesn't mean that Brad doesn't believe Alex. The same could be true of Sam and yourself, whether Sam or yourself are Brad or not.
YOU made accusations here publicly against the individual who was talking to Alex. You falsely accused that individual publicly, so... Yes, it became necessary for that individual after being asked about it in order to answer and rebut your false accusations to share a photo copy- pdf file of that discussion, and yes, I have seen that.
What PDF? Where did that come from? Who prepared it? How do you know it's authentic and accurate?
Two of the other people he is accusing and libeling, who you are claiming you can testify about, and are further saying that there is documentation about have never talked to Alex ever, or even tried to contact him.
Which two people are you talking about? How do you know whether or not they tried to contact Alex?
Well, Mr Pickle, even though you are asking Pat, I can answer this myself, as a group of us asked them about your claims, and Adam's. About both of your claims here on this forum, and the claims by Alex and Adam that all was documented, and so we all got answers from them in reply to that.
Danny Shelton simply said " I have never talked to Alex"
Brenda Walsh said "I have never met Alex, nor have I have talked with him, written him, or communicated with him in any way shape or form! What is interesting is how he even knows my name!!"
You have to remember that both Danny and Brenda have proven that they will lie, and so their word alone cannot be used to settle anything. It's unfortunate but true.
But even if their alleged statements above were true, which is in doubt, neither statement contradicts my statement which you are complaining about.
Thank you for admitting that both Brad and Trent contacted Alex. Are you willing to admit that they also tried to convince Alex to drop charges?
Thank you for also admitting that Danny never said that he had never tried to contact Alex, and thus that Pat misspoke.
... and 3ABN's accuser, Bob Pickle ....
I respectfully request that you not call me "3ABN's accuser." It makes it sound like 3ABN defends pedophilia, private inurement, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and out and out lies.
I personally would like to see the wrongdoing separated as far as possible from 3ABN. When it comes to malicious prosecution and abuse of process, that is difficult to do. But certainly please refrain from connecting the defense of admitted pedophile Tommy Shelton with 3ABN, as far as possible.