There has been NO attempted Witness Tampering
Post by Pat Williams » Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:53 am UTC
You would be hard pressed to prove that, and you have refused to try, from what I recall.
I am back from my hiatus/mandatory vacation here, and am admittedly attempting to play catch up, but this is a strange accusation to me. If you are accusing people of witness tampering, Mr Pickle, then the burden of proof is on you. I can not see where you have given any evidence or support for your accusations here, but I do see where you refused to give that:
I started this thread to give you an opportunity to prove that "Brad, Trent, Brenda, and/or Danny did not try to convince Alex to drop charges":
... It is being claimed there is witness tampering going on. etc etc etc...
So, are you trying to say that Brad, Trent, Brenda, and/or Danny did not try to convince Alex to drop charges? On what basis are you making this false claim? Apparently you've found yourself backed into a corner, and rather than admit that you can't prove that it is 100% false, you want me to prove the contrary. But that's another topic for another time.
Brad doesn't believe Alex, ....
How do you know that Brad doesn't believe Alex? How do you know? Even if he were to say that he doesn't believe Alex, how do you know that he doesn't?
How do I know? Brad is known to those "who know him" by his character and his actions and words as a good man, and despite Adam's accusations and the posts here, he isn't known as a liar by any who know him. But because of all that, he was asked about the posts here and his answer was quoted:
and I quote again:
“I ABSOLUTELY DO NOT BELIEVE ALEX’s STATEMENT”
Also stated,
"Alex is lying again, I have never talked with any lawyer nor had anything documented from my conversation with Alex"
There is no reason not to accept his testimony, and none has been offered as evidence by you, or by any other accuser here...
But even if he hadn't answered the questions caused by Alex's friend, Adam's attacks of him, and your own here on this forum?? The fact that Alex questioned and implied then outright posted here, that he thought Sam was Brad, and the fact that his friend Adam (who is in his confidence), came on here and asked Pat: " If Sam isn't Brad, are you?" should cause any rational logical person to understand that they both understand that Brad doesn't believe Alex, otherwise they would have no reason to falsely surmise that Sam, and or Pat ( who don't believe Alex) are Brad, or even imply or ask that Those who comprehend that can see that this is just a facetious argument being made by you to discredit and undermine those you are attacking.
Yes, one conversation was and is documented, and that's how I know Pickle's witness tampering allegations are 100% false.
Which conversation are you referring to? Are you privy to a recording of it? If not, how can you say that you know?
A recording? Well that would be illegal and inadmissible now wouldn't it, Mr Pickle? (How many times have you came on here claiming that, or jumped up in court claiming that in regards to Linda Shelton's conversations with Dr Arild Abrahamsson? )A better question would be since you are claiming witness tampering has been going on, and you, Joy, and Alex' "friend, Adam brought it all up here to begin with... "Are you privy to a recording of any conversation? If not, how can you say, or post
as if you know?"
But no, I am not privy to any recorded conversation, but Adam brought up a written conversation, claiming it was documented (It was) and he apparently was privy to it, as he quoted from it publicly here on this forum. YOU made accusations here publicly against the individual who was talking to Alex. You falsely accused that individual publicly, so... Yes, it became necessary for that individual after being asked about it in order to answer and rebut your false accusations to share a photo copy- pdf file of that discussion, and yes, I have seen that. Again a better question would be, " Are you privy to that conversation? For you were the one accusing and condemning the individual, and if you aren't privy to it, then you have even less excuse to accuse them.
Two of the other people he is accusing and libeling, who you are claiming you can testify about, and are further saying that there is documentation about have never talked to Alex ever, or even tried to contact him.
Which two people are you talking about? How do you know whether or not they tried to contact Alex?
Well, Mr Pickle, even though you are asking Pat, I can answer this myself, as a group of us asked them about your claims, and Adam's. About both of your claims here on this forum, and the claims by Alex and Adam that all was documented, and so we all got answers from them in reply to that.
Danny Shelton simply said " I have
never talked to Alex"
Brenda Walsh said "I have never met Alex, nor have I have talked with him, written him, or communicated with him in any way shape or form! What is interesting is how he even knows my name!!"
Again, a better question would be "How do
you know whether or not they tried to contact Alex? And, why would you accuse them of witness tampering, or even trying to get Alex to drop charges (which is not witness tampering) without any proof or evidence of even that?
cc: to other forum
edit 2 fix quote boxes