Why would 3-ABN take any formal notice of TS's plea?
I would immagine that 3-ABN would believe that his plea was personally related to Danny Shelton and family members and not related to 3-ABN.
Why? Did not TS plead guilty to charges not related in any way to 3-ABN?
NOTE: I am just speculating as to how 3-ABN might have reacted. Who knows, only someone associated with 3-ABN. I am just thinking out loud.
Let's imagine that Bill Gates of Microsoft has a brother named Dave who also works at Microsoft where he is in charge of Programming. While he works at Microsoft he is accused of being a sexual deviant: adultery, sodomy, pedophilia, gay sex etc. He then leaves his employment and is later convicted in a court of law of being a sexual deviant.
Can you imagine the scrambling at the Legal Dept. in Redmond?
-Did Dave use his high position within the company to gain sexual favors from employees, their families, or Microsoft clients?
-Did Dave commit felonies on company property or using company resources?
-Did Dave spread any STD's to company employees affecting their health/productivity to include even long-term hospitalization and/or death?
-Did Dave's blood relationship with the company founder (the world's richest man with connections in law, govt., business, society, et al) enable him to commit these crimes with impunity?
-What is our potential exposure to a PR meltdown which could affect stock price, competitiveness, and future projects?
This is why 3ABN would take formal notice of Tommy's plea.
SDAminister