It was brought to my attention that the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists is not allowing the Adventist Today journal to "stock, sell, promote, or advertise" the book
Fatal Accounts: The Audacity of an Adventist Auditor's Quest for Transparency by David Dennis, at the 2010 General Conference session in Atlanta, Georgia.
I agree with the general concept of not airing one's dirty laundry in public.
However, in looking over some of the David Dennis materials, I was struck by a startling similarity to some of the things discussed on Advent Talk Forum.
For instance, I ran across this sentence in "An Open Letter" addressed to Dr. Jan Paulsen, General Conference President from David Dennis dated October 30, 2001.
With the help of millions of tithe dollars the GC repeatedly delayed the judicial process and blocked the discovery phase to keep from us documents we had requested showing to some degree the depth of corruption within the leadership of our church.
And then further on down:
At my hearing the group was carefully chosen for the “kangaroo court” without my input and I was denied the presence of an attorney.
(Does this remind anyone of Linda Shelton's experience?)
I had pointed to some of the same personal business ventures in which Folkenberg and his close friends were involved, such as the personal deals with ADRA concerning the computer sales...
Sounds reminiscent of Danny Shelton's book deals.
And finally,
Contrary to the charges leveled at me, I have been faithful to my marriage vows. I have not been guilty, as publicly charged, of sexual misconduct. I read a statement to the GC Committee, declaring unequivocally my innocence of the charges Folkenberg had brought. After reading the statement, which the executioners chose to totally ignore, I was ushered from the committee room. I was not allowed to answer, nor even hear, the eloquent and lengthy presentations of Folkenberg’s chosen hatchet men.
Linda Shelton, again!
I am wondering if the reason the Seventh-day Adventist Church leadership has been so hesitant to take action to limit its relationship with 3ABN is that the two entities are much closer in principle than anyone would have thought!