Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

Bob, now you know that man is tired of talking to you about a dropped lawsuit.  Not stressed just tired of you trying to work his last nerve. 

Now, explain why you are trying to file "evidence" in a case that is all but closed?  The one and only thing you should concerned about TS and his allegations is that he was allowed to work unchecked at 3ABN, which is huge.  However, the rest, including how he is paying for he legal defense is not your(general) concern.  I am not sure how long the courts are going to allow you all to continue without some kind of sanctions what what is quickly approach frivilous.

Unfortunately (or is that fortuitous, indeed) for Simpson, he made it an issue by his own response. And then there is the grossly mis-leading summary that really constitutes a serious effort to confuse a new assigned judge. Problem is the summary is so factually devoid of the truth, it crosses the line from "zealous advocacy" to violation of the Rules for Professional Conduct...oh, my, does that mean we have to file another rule 11 request??? C'est  la vie!!!

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

[Gailon Arthur Joy]

Not going since there are people who will personally testify of the personal knowledge of TS's acts which make the preliminary hearing almost a formality for the judge to see that there is enough evidence to bring charges against TS.

Not true. In the state of Va as well as many other states, the judge will want a case to go before a grand jury and they decide whether to indict or not. But, guess what?  Indictment happens in 98% of cases that go before the grand jury because only the prosecuation is allowed to present their arguments. The defense is not even allowed in the room. So, if you only hear one side of a situation, even with no evidence to present, most people are going to go that way as statistics show.

You probably also thought that for the police to arrest someone, they must have evidence. False.  A woman for instance can go to the police and say her husband beat her up. With no evidence or nothing to prove it happened, the police will go arrest the husband, he will be processed and his picture will be in the paper and on the news the next day....all done with no proof.

Did you know that in Va, the detective can swear out a warrant with no evidence..only heresay?

Did you know that it is my understanding that Tommy has never been questioned one time by anyone before or after his arrest?

And why would you question a liar with all the evidence there is against good old Tommy Ray Shelton??? And guess what, the entire board of directors dismissed Linda Sue Shelton without even meeting with her!!! Runs in the family, doesn't it???

What goes around, comes around, Sam..Tommy is likely facing some very serious charges and the Bro does not have an old classmate police chief to get to doctor the record and dismiss the charges this time...guess that means they will have to rely upon other interventionary measures...like Brenda Walsh for instance...we know that she is a great character witness!!!! But, best keep your hands off the states witnesses, Brenda, could come back to bite you!!!

And then there is Brad Walker, the producer that would like to produce a null pros for his purportedly favorite wife and daughter of Tommy...but that could bring up some seriously problematic issues relating to the credibility of the intervenor, given the lack of marital bliss...yes, Brad, those little sidebar relationships can come back to haunt us at the most inconvenient times!!! Sometimes we must let the chips fall where they will fall!!!

And you are right, SAM, it just occurred to me that they have yet to question Tommy's own son and therapists. That should render a treasure trove of information, shouldn't it??? Perhaps an early "plea bargain" would save a lot of those rocks from rolling back on top of Tommy..remember the rock rolling analogy???

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

[Bob Pickle]

Simpson filed a motion to strike in the First Circuit on April 7, seeking sanctions of $1000 against us. We responded on April 18, including with our response a motion for sanctions. Simpson replied today. These three documents are attached below.

What do you think of Simpson's reply, particularly the fact that he completely and totally failed to even try to show how we took his statements out of context, or how his damaging admissions weren't damaging admissions of any sort?

It also seems to me that Simpson opposes the American judicial system which allows for due process rights.

[Artiste]

I found this section interesting:

Plaintiffs admitted that Defendants’ reporting about the pedophilia allegations against Tommy Shelton was
part of what “framed the original basis for Plaintiffs’ lawsuit against them,” a clear, tacit admission that Plaintiffs lied and obstructed discovery when they sought to prohibit discovery of those pedophilia allegations on the basis of relevancy. Case: 08-2457     Document: 00116050394     Page: 14      Date Filed: 04/18/2010      Entry ID: 5438472

[Artiste]

And also the following:

Plaintiffs also outrageously ask that the status reports, with attachments taken from the district court record, be “physically destroyed”! Plaintiffs resort to this outrageous, on-the-record request since their counsel can find no way to send Christine Parizo into the Court of Appeals to secretly remove the sole copy of these filings as Plaintiffs did before. (RA 160; RA
212-3).

[Bob Pickle]

Notice in the untimely response attached below how Simpson tries to say that the Tommy allegations weren't part of what framed the original basis of the lawsuit.

How can it be both ways? On Feb. 18 he says it was part of what framed the original basis of the lawsuit, and now that Tommy is arrested he says it wasn't part of it.

Is there any possibility that Simpson is being truthful in both statements? Or must one of them be a lie?

[tinka]

He is being paid to be the "great spinner", the more confusing the facts, the more abusing to the system that cannot keep up, this is the training of the "vipers" to win. I still think we had the best spinners and lying lawyers in our case. We know exactly what you are going through!!  Document after document of lies and that is exactly what they are doing to you.

We  even eventiually found how the judges were connected.

[Daryl Fawcett]

It will be interesting to see how the judge will eventually respond to all of this.

[Johann]

It will be interesting to see how the judge will eventually respond to all of this.

What do you expect will happen?

[Daryl Fawcett]

Good question, however, I would like to think that the judge would want to get to the bottom of two contradictory statements.

It will be interesting to see how the judge will eventually respond to all of this.

What do you expect will happen?