Bob, now you know that man is tired of talking to you about a dropped lawsuit. Not stressed just tired of you trying to work his last nerve.
Now, explain why you are trying to file "evidence" in a case that is all but closed?
Di, it is very simple.
When the judge dismissed the case, he said we could file a motion for costs. We did that the same day we filed our notice of appeal regarding the dismissal.
When the judge denied our motion for costs, we asked him to reconsider, and also filed a motion for sanctions against Simpson for lying.
When the judge denied those motions, we appealed a second time.
We have a legal right to appeal those decisions. We also have a legal right for the court of appeals to review whatever relevant portions of the court record we request, and the rules are such that it is our responsibility to make sure those portions arrive at the court of appeals.
We therefore requested that the district court forward to the court of appeals the bank statements produced by MidCountry Bank. The magistrate judge denied that request without comment, and we then objected to his orders as we have a legal right to do.
Simpson responded to our objections, and in doing so he injected the issue of the allegations against Tommy into a dispute over forwarding the bank statements to the court of appeals.
Bear in mind that when one files a motion or a response to a motion or a reply to a response, one can file evidence that pertains to that motion or response or reply. And this we have done, as we have a legal right to do. Simpson has done the same.
On February 18, 2010, Simpson admitted that our reporting about Danny's cover up of Tommy was part of the original basis for the lawsuit. In doing so, Simpson tacitly admitted that he lied in the summer of 2008 when he claimed that the Tommy allegations were irrelevant. We have repeatedly accused Danny and 3ABN and their lawyers of obstructing discovery, and Simpson has now tacitly admitted that we are correct, for he asked the court in the summer of 2008 to prohibit discovery into the Tommy allegations on the bogus grounds of irrelevance.
This all has a bearing on the bank statements. Simpson has tried to tell the court that the bank statements are irrelevant to the lawsuit, which he also falsely claimed regarding the Remnant documents. Now we have Simpson tacitly admitting on the record that he lied when he claimed that the Tommy allegations were irrelevant. Therefore, the bank statements must also be relevant.
Moreover, Simpson claimed that our reporting about Danny's cover up of Tommy was "uncorroborated, unfounded." The five felony arrest warrants and the police department press release disprove that assertion.
If Simpson didn't want us to file the arrest warrants and press release, he never should have injected the Tommy issue into the discussion, and never should have lied about our reporting being unfounded and uncorroborated. He raised the issues. We have a right to address the issues he raised.
Author
Topic: Simpson may be stressed. (Read 27553 times)
