You are more than capable of using your head and the facts you have as far as documents go to easily see that his salary is now about 1/2 of what it was.. ----> because DS's monthly income is listed for 2010 in those divorce documents, and if you multiply that by 12, and then compare it to his yearly income listed on previous 990's when he was President of 3ABN.. it's very obvious, and easy to see.
The 2006 Form 990 reported Danny's salary as $72,802 for the year.
The 2007 Form 990 reported Danny's salary as $78,404 for the year. Danny allegedly stepped down form being president in September 2007.
The 2008 Form 990 filed with OR and IL reported Danny's salary as $70,309 for the year, plus $160 bonus, plus $96,000 in land.
The divorce papers reported Danny's 2009 salary as $6,445.50 per month ($77,346 for the year), plus $52,407.41 as part of an alleged non-compete agreement.
The divorce papers reported Danny's 2010 salary as $6,250 per month ($75,000 for the year).
You are clearly mistaken, and it has nothing to do with quibbling about words.
Stop the spin and distortion. The point is that there are at least three different versions of 3ABN's 2008 Form 990 floating around out there, and the one filed with the IRS omits the fact admitted on the other versions, that 3ABN gave $96,000 to Danny Shelton.
Spin and distortion? Bob Pickle, what you just posted [bold text] is either a gross mistake on your part or an outright lie!
It is neither. It was a typo. I accidentally left out the words "of land." I think most folks reading this thread would recognize that my issue was with Part III of Schedule J of the version filed with the IRS omitting the fact that the $96,000 in "compensation" consisted of 48 acres of land.
I wouldn't have even written that sentence if you had not refused to acknowledge the obvious and indisputable: That 3ABN has produced three different versions of their 2008 Form 990, and the one filed with the IRS, unlike the other two, does not acknowledge that the $96,000 of other "compensation" was in the form of 48 acres of land given to Danny Shelton.
It is also obvious that rather than giving away its assets to Danny Shelton when he allegedly stepped down, 3ABN should have summarily fired him for covering up the child molestation allegations against Tommy Shelton, when he knew that Tommy had done things for which the statute of limitations applied.
If 3ABN in essence terminated Linda Shelton for talking too long on the telephone, and wiped her off of 3ABN's website and programming, then 3ABN should have done the same to Danny Shelton, who committed a much worse atrocity than talking too long on the telephone.
Can you not agree with these points?