Good! Then let the record show that When 3ABN received the letter from Glenn Dryden they did not in fact threaten him.
The record does not show that. Further discovery would be required before drawing that conclusion.
You never said, meant or intended to give the impression or to imply that the letter from the Attorney was the reply from 3ABN to Glenn Dryden, right Bob???
I do not recall being aware in 2007 of any other reply that Glenn Dryden received anything other than that letter. That being the case, I would think that in 2007 I thought that 3ABN had something to do with that reply.
It is a fact he was not representing 3ABN when he wrote to the Church of God Pastor in 2003.
I do not know that that was the case.
It is a fact he represents others also and in this instance he was representing Tommy Shelton as he said.
If 3ABN was opposed to covering up the child molestation allegations, and Tommy was the only one who wanted that done, then Mike Riva had a conflict of interest in covering up the child molestation allegations at Tommy's behest, contrary to the wishes of 3ABN, his larger client.
But it is a matter of record that Danny was in favor of covering up the child molestation allegations, and that he probably used 3ABN's telephones to intimidate Dryden, and that the very point he raised in his intimidating messages was the very one raised in Riva's letter.
Danny's messages also make it clear that Danny contacted an attorney, and Danny was very in earnest about his inquiry with an attorney. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that it was Danny, using 3ABN's telephones, that arranged for Riva's letter, which contained the very point Danny tried to make in his intimidating message.
I therefore conclude that in all likelihood, it was 3ABN's out-of-control president, Danny Shelton, that arranged that reply to Dryden's letter, and thus it could probably be considered a reply from 3ABN too.
Further it does not appear you are telling the truth here, for even Dryden said as I just did.
I told the truth about what Dryden told me about Riva's letter on August 14, 2006. Certainly you didn't have my phones bugged, and thus you don't know what he told me.
Now the question is, who paid the bill for Riva to write that letter? If I had to guess, I'd say 3ABN paid for it, not Tommy.
Then you would be wrong. You shouldn't surmise, Bob. Especially without any valid reason to
I have a valid reason to ask the question, and to make that guess as to the answer.