What motion of ours are you suggesting was a premeditated move? You aren't clear. And Saylor didn't refer to any motion in his statement.
Are you serious? A ten year old could make the connections here. Stop playing your games. If you want to engage in an adult discussion than handle yourself as such. The complaint you filed is referenced in your initial post (Defendants Robert Pickle and Gailon Arthur Joy have filed a complaint of judicial misconduct against me). You can play your games and say, "You said motion, but it was a complaint and you said motion." The fact of the matter is you knew EXACTLY what was being referenced and this is your MO, nitpick when it is another's words, but when it is your own - someone is twisting them or misrepresenting them or they have been taken out of context. Start handling yourself with some dignity and integrity.
Could you be specific as to when in the case we questioned the integrity of judges?
Again, are you serious? If it is that murky to you, I would suggest it is your own actions that are causing you to see through the glass dimly. You have another thread going where you reference the fact that you are potentially being sued for disparaging and defamatory remarks. You have also not provided the remarks that are the subject of this situation. You have claimed that judges didn't read your filings (and you have NO proof of such, only your speculative insinuations) which is a backhanded insinuation of judicial misconduct (this being your most recent defamatory remarks
http://www.adventtalk.com/forums/index.php/topic,1784.msg22472.html#msg22472). At this point, you are lucky you have only one legal professional who has taken you to task.
As far as the lawyers go, they have been caught red handed a number of times making statements that were less than truthful, similar to Walt Thompson and Danny Shelton, and have stooped so low as to try to cover up child molestation allegations against Tommy Shelton. Lawyers that would do such things don't have as much integrity in my book as lawyers who refuse to do such things.
No, you are wrong. You have insinuated, and expect everyone to accept your words as authority, but you have no proof, no judgments, nothing. None of your accusations are anything more than your amateurish insinuations or speculation. Your constant focus on "allegations of child molestation" evidence that there is something more to your motives, as you constantly return to this, especially in your archived YouTube videos.
You lack credibility. You lack authority. You are not to be believed. You have quickly learned to play the legal game of extension. Your filing against Judge Saylor was a calculated exercise. You weighed the cost against the possible ROI and decided that it was worth effort. It paid off. However, you have shortened your own lease in the legal arena tremendously, and you are unaware of this fact. You consider "your book" too definitive. It is sad that you seem to have forgotten that the only "books" that matter are not the earthly ones, not yours. Enjoy the paycheck while it lasts.
Author
Topic: Judge Saylor recuses himself; Judge Rya W. Zobel now assigned to our case (Read 16854 times)
