Advent Talk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

You can find an active Save 3ABN website at http://www.Save-3ABN.com.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 13   Go Down

Author Topic: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know  (Read 81822 times)

0 Members and 30 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #60 on: October 23, 2009, 07:10:15 AM »

30:33   Surely the churning of milk bringeth forth butter, and the wringing of the nose bringeth forth blood: so the forcing of wrath bringeth forth strife. 

Just in case any doubt on what is going on with the political corruption. I do not think it will go back to simmering or peace. Maybe for a moment for the last hour seekers of truth then sudden destruction.   But the signal of One world Power for a day is now in view. "The New World Order" appearing closer and closer. Will huge strife cause the handover to the beast???


Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #61 on: November 11, 2009, 02:14:49 AM »



The health bill that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is bringing to a vote (H.R. 3962) is 1,990 pages. Here are some of the details you need to know.
What the government will require you to do:
• Sec. 202 (p. 91-92) of the bill requires you to enroll in a "qualified plan." If you get your insurance at work, your employer will have a "grace period" to switch you to a "qualified plan," meaning a plan designed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. If you buy your own insurance, there's no grace period. You'll have to enroll in a qualified plan as soon as any term in your contract changes, such as the co-pay, deductible or benefit.
 
• Sec. 224 (p. 118) provides that 18 months after the bill becomes law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services will decide what a "qualified plan" covers and how much you'll be legally required to pay for it. That's like a banker telling you to sign the loan agreement now, then filling in the interest rate and repayment terms 18 months later.
On Nov. 2, the Congressional Budget Office estimated what the plans will likely cost. An individual earning $44,000 before taxes who purchases his own insurance will have to pay a $5,300 premium and an estimated $2,000 in out-of-pocket expenses, for a total of $7,300 a year, which is 17% of his pre-tax income. A family earning $102,100 a year before taxes will have to pay a $15,000 premium plus an estimated $5,300 out-of-pocket, for a $20,300 total, or 20% of its pre-tax income. Individuals and families earning less than these amounts will be eligible for subsidies paid directly to their insurer.
 
• Sec. 303 (pp. 167-168) makes it clear that, although the "qualified plan" is not yet designed, it will be of the "one size fits all" variety. The bill claims to offer choice—basic, enhanced and premium levels—but the benefits are the same. Only the co-pays and deductibles differ. You will have to enroll in the same plan, whether the government is paying for it or you and your employer are footing the bill.
 
• Sec. 59b (pp. 297-299) says that when you file your taxes, you must include proof that you are in a qualified plan. If not, you will be fined thousands of dollars. Illegal immigrants are exempt from this requirement.
 
• Sec. 412 (p. 272) says that employers must provide a "qualified plan" for their employees and pay 72.5% of the cost, and a smaller share of family coverage, or incur an 8% payroll tax. Small businesses, with payrolls from $500,000 to $750,000, are fined less.
 
 
Eviscerating Medicare:
In addition to reducing future Medicare funding by an estimated $500 billion, the bill fundamentally changes how Medicare pays doctors and hospitals, permitting the government to dictate treatment decisions.
• Sec. 1302 (pp. 672-692) moves Medicare from a fee-for-service payment system, in which patients choose which doctors to see and doctors are paid for each service they provide, toward what's called a "medical home."
The medical home is this decade's version of HMO-restrictions on care. A primary-care provider manages access to costly specialists and diagnostic tests for a flat monthly fee. The bill specifies that patients may have to settle for a nurse practitioner rather than a physician as the primary-care provider. Medical homes begin with demonstration projects, but the HHS secretary is authorized to "disseminate this approach rapidly on a national basis."
 
A December 2008 Congressional Budget Office report noted that "medical homes" were likely to resemble the unpopular gatekeepers of 20 years ago if cost control was a priority.
 
• Sec. 1114 (pp. 391-393) replaces physicians with physician assistants in overseeing care for hospice patients.
 
• Secs. 1158-1160 (pp. 499-520) initiates programs to reduce payments for patient care to what it costs in the lowest cost regions of the country. This will reduce payments for care (and by implication the standard of care) for hospital patients in higher cost areas such as New York and Florida.
 
• Sec. 1161 (pp. 520-545) cuts payments to Medicare Advantage plans (used by 20% of seniors). Advantage plans have warned this will result in reductions in optional benefits such as vision and dental care.
 
• Sec. 1402 (p. 756) says that the results of comparative effectiveness research conducted by the government will be delivered to doctors electronically to guide their use of "medical items and services."
 
 
Questionable Priorities:
While the bill will slash Medicare funding, it will also direct billions of dollars to numerous inner-city social work and diversity programs with vague standards of accountability.
• Sec. 399V (p. 1422) provides for grants to community "entities" with no required qualifications except having "documented community activity and experience with community healthcare workers" to "educate, guide, and provide experiential learning opportunities" aimed at drug abuse, poor nutrition, smoking and obesity. "Each community health worker program receiving funds under the grant will provide services in the cultural context most appropriate for the individual served by the program."
 
These programs will "enhance the capacity of individuals to utilize health services and health related social services under Federal, State and local programs by assisting individuals in establishing eligibility . . . and in receiving services and other benefits" including transportation and translation services.
 
• Sec. 222 (p. 617) provides reimbursement for culturally and linguistically appropriate services. This program will train health-care workers to inform Medicare beneficiaries of their "right" to have an interpreter at all times and with no co-pays for language services.
 
• Secs. 2521 and 2533 (pp. 1379 and 1437) establishes racial and ethnic preferences in awarding grants for training nurses and creating secondary-school health science programs. For example, grants for nursing schools should "give preference to programs that provide for improving the diversity of new nurse graduates to reflect changes in the demographics of the patient population." And secondary-school grants should go to schools "graduating students from disadvantaged backgrounds including racial and ethnic minorities."
 
• Sec. 305 (p. 189) Provides for automatic Medicaid enrollment of newborns who do not otherwise have insurance.
For the text of the bill with page numbers, see www.defendyourhealthcare.us.
—Ms. McCaughey is chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths and a former Lt. Governor of New York state.
 
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #62 on: November 16, 2009, 04:57:23 AM »

Why is Fort Hood a Surprise?
By David Rushton Friday, November 6, 2009
I have long been mystified as to why Americans and Canadians do not understand Islam. It is very simple. While most Christians and Jews pay only lip service to their Bibles, the Muslims believe in the koran with every part of their being. They rise before dawn to pray and they pray five times a day. They mean business in their worship of the false god allah.
They believe in every verse of the koran and the Hadith. But Americns have never read the koran so they are shocked by such carnage as was caused at Fort Hood.
So let me quote just a few verses from the koran. Are you ready?
Infidels (unbelievers) are the Muslim’s undoubted enemies (Sura 4:101).
This ideal is instilled in the minds and hearts of Muslim children by their mothers.
Muslims are to besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.
(Sura 9:5) That’s us they are to besiege because we do not believe in and follow the teachings of Mohammed.
Seize them and put them to death wherever you find them, kill them wherever you find them, seek out the enemies of Islam relentlessly” (Sura 4:90)
I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers, Smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger tips of them. (Koran 8:12)
Take not Jews and Christians for friends. They are friends to one another. He who takes them for friends is one of them.” Sura 5:51
Believers, make war on the infidels who are your neighbors and let them find you rigorous. (Sura 9:123).
Allah loves those who “fight for his cause” (Sura 61:3).
If a Muslim does not go to war, Allah will punish him. (Sura 9:39)
Muslims are to be “ruthless to unbelievers but love Muslims (Sura 48:29).
Kill any person you wish if it be a “just cause.” (Sura 6:152)
‘’I have been ordered to fight with people till they say, none has the right to be worshipped but allah ‘’ Hadith 4:196
Mohammed also said, Know that paradise is under the shade of the swords.’’ Hadith vol. 4:73
On July 4, 2002, a Muslim taxi driver in Los Angeles shot to death two people at the El Al terminal in LAX and three more were wounded. For weeks thereafter Psychologists and Psychiatrists wondered why this apparently peaceful man had killed these people. But the answer was very clearly pinned to his front door that morning. A note on the door said simply “Read the Koran.”
A few years earlier a Muslim soldier Hassan Akbar in Kuwait hurled a grenade into a tent full of American Soldiers. Two officers were killed and 14 injured. Everybody wondered what prompted him to do it. Simple, he had been reading the Koran and he believed those soldiers were his enemies.
So why waste time trying to discover what prompted Major Nidal Malik to open fire at Fort Hood. He was a Muslim and he believed in the Koran. The only mystery to me is why the army would allow any Muslim to be a member. The Koran clearly states Infidels (unbelievers) are the Muslims’ undoubted enemies. Yes, we Christians and Jews are their enemies. We did not say that, they did.
Is it not enough to remember how many Jews have been killed in Israel by Muslims who boarded their buses and entered their restaurants with bombs? Why is it so hard for our leaders to understand that Muslims are determined to kill unbelievers and take over their countries for their fictitious god allah.
I do not hate the Muslims. In fact I believe they are to be pitied because they are first victims of this terrible cult of war and hatred. I do not suggest that we should start killing Muslims. I do think they need to be controlled in every situation and never given opportunity to serve in our armed forces or police. They consider us their enemies and feel it is their duty to kill anyone who does not bow the knee to allah.  By the way I have deliberately used lower case for allah, and koran because neither is worthy of capitalization.
I wish that this horrific incident would bring Americans and Canadians back to God. What will it take? Another 9-11? No that didn’t do it either. I don’t know what will. God is never mentioned anymore in our politically correct system because our leaders are afraid of offending those who believe in allah. Yet Muslims shout Allahu Akbar!” Meaning “Our god is greater than your God.” Well I have news for you. Not only is no God greater than our God, but in fact there is no other God but our God. So let’s stand up and fight for Him 
 
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #63 on: November 16, 2009, 05:18:22 AM »

A little speach on Health Care by Judge N.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7n2m-X7OIuY

Then click on GI Joe and Lilly by Oak Ridge Boys as it comes up with the speach of judge

A little tear will let you down! 
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #64 on: November 17, 2009, 05:21:23 AM »

Make up your own mind on this corruption!  Interesting, very interesting.

 

 

Sanctions for A Political Viewpoint Effects All Lawyers
Dr. Orly Taitz to Appeal Federal Sanctions


 

November 9, 2009

Atlanta:

The sanctions of Dr. Orly Taitz by Judge Land of the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia last month should have set off alarm bells for every public interest attorney in the United States. Dr. Taitz's position is that she was sanctioned $20,000 not for outrageous behavior but for her political viewpoints. She has also been a target for the federal judiciary who have made serious ethical and criminal accusations against her but have denied her and her clients including former US presidential candidate Alan Keyes due process on the their claims regarding President Obama's citizenship and birth certificate. Taitz has spent more than a year researching the Obama birth certificate issue and is considered a leading expert on the usurper theory.

Jonathan Levy will be joining Dr. Orly Taitz in her quest for justice as co-counsel on her appeal of sanctions in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals (Case No. 09-15418 BB).

According to Levy: Orly Taitz has been sanctioned in part for making allusions to the civil rights movement and to the dangers of the Holocaust in her legal arguments. It is arbitrary and capricious to make a determination that some attorneys may invoke historical figures and events while others whose politics the courts find disagreeable may not. Taitz invoked the name of civil rights icon Thurgood Marshall in her arguments and was chastised for doing so by a federal judge, what is next, sanctions for mentioning Gandhi, Stalin, or George Washington without permission?

Dr. Jonathan Levy is best known for his representation of anti globalist figures, Chen Shui-bian, former president of the Republic of China, Nzita Henriques Tiago, president of the Provisional Republic of Cabinda and as legal advisor to the former Yugoslav president and vice president, Slobadan Milosevic and Dr. Vojislav Seselj, defense teams at the Hague Tribunal in addition to his participation in a decade long lawsuit against the Vatican Bank for post Second World War money laundering of concentration camp gold.

 

Related Court Cases:

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION and Federal Home Loan Bank Board, Defendants-Appellees (1957). (link)

NEWMAN V. UNITED STATES EX REL. FRIZZELL, 238 U. S. 537 (1915) (link)

 

Motion For Reconsideration In Barnett Vs. Obama (link)

 

Here come all the plaintiffs (aside from plaintiffs Markham Robinson and Willey Drake represented by Gary Kreep) and motion for reconsideration of October 29th order under Rule 59E and Rule 60.

A newly discovered fact, material to this action, that was the reason for most errors in the order, is the fact that on October 1, 2009 Your Honor hired as your law clerk an attorney Siddharth Velamoor, who previously worked for Perkins Coie, a law firm representing the defendant in the above case, Mr. Obama. As a matter of fact Perkins Coie was one of the firms representing the defendants in a prior legal action filed by the plaintiffs in this very case, Ambassador Alan Keyes et al against Secretary of State Deborah Bowen and Democratic party electors specifically for not vetting Mr. Obama as a presidential candidate, as Ms. Bowen didn't request any vital records and never checked any vital records of Mr. Obama, as she and all the other secretaries of states took his Declaration of a Candidate on its face value. As it is a common knowledge that law clerks do most of the research and write most of the opinions for the judges, the order to dismiss this case was de facto written or largely influenced by an attorney who until recently worked for a firm representing the defendant in this case, and who  currently is working as a clerk for the presiding judge, as such most of the order is tainted by bias. This is a clear prejudice against the plaintiffs. While Mr. Velamoor will surely claim that he didn't work on Obama case before, his employment with Perkins Coie should've disqualified him, and indeed the order reads as if it is written by the defense counsel, highly biased against the plaintiffs, 99 percent of the order either misstates the facts or the pleadings or oral argument, it misstates the law and is full of personal attacks, de facto accusing decorated members of the military of being cowards; and this order is particularly  used as a tool in what seems to be a concerted effort by this Court and judge Clay D Land in GA to use the power of federal judiciary to publicly lynch the undersigned counsel,  to use innuendo, ex parte defamatory and slanderous statements to assassinate her character, to destroy her as a human being and endanger her law license, only because she is not only the only attorney brave enough to bring most of eligibility legal actions, to bring actions from plaintiffs with real standing, the only one to get any hearings, but she is also the only one to bring forward evidence from licensed investigators showing Mr. Obama committing multiple felonies, for which he should be serving lengthy prison term. The court erred in hiring Mr. Velamoor or in the alternative not recusing himself from hearing this case.
The plaintiffs request the court to strike from the order unsupported and prejudicial verbiage. Please see in the attachment Declaration of the undersigned attorney.
The court has stated in the pleadings that the undersigned attorney has encouraged her supporters to contact the court in an attempt to influence his decision in the October 5 hearing. This is not true. The plaintiffs request this stricken from the final order.
During October 5 hearing your honor has stated that the undersigned attorney encouraged the supporters to attempt to influence the court's decision. This never happened. When the undersigned attorney requested to respond, the court stated: 'no, no, it's done. You've put it out there. Now it's your responsibility. The undersigned attorney has done nothing of a kind and believes that this information might have come from some ex parte communications with the presiding judge coming from parties connected to the defense, which is prejudicial, inflammatory and defamatory. The undersigned requests it stricken from the order.
The court has included in the order mention of yet another ex-parte communication with the judge, where two parties claimed that the undersigned counsel has asked them to perjure themselves. Please see the declaration, this was a slanderous, defamatory, prejudicial allegation, and the undersigned had no opportunity to respond.
The undersigned believes that the letters came from Larry Sinclair and Lucas Smith.
Larry Sinclair was asked to authenticate an affidavit he submitted to the Chicago police regarding the homicide of Mr. Donald Young. In the affidavit submitted to the Chicago police and in his book recently published, Mr. Sinclair has stated that Mr. Donald Young has contacted him repeatedly and stated that he had a homosexual relationship with Mr. Barack Obama and that Mr. Young was found dead with multiple gunshot wounds December 23, 2007 at the onset of 2008 Democratic primary elections. Any allegations of the undersigned attorney asking the witness to perjure himself are not only completely defamatory and prejudicial, but are void of any sense or reason, as Mr. Sinclair's affidavit regarding Mr. Young's homicide can be found filed with the Chicago PD and in his book. A copy of the Affidavit of Larry Sinclair and Coroners Certificate of Death of Donald Young is attached as an Exhibit.
Lucas Smith was asked to authenticate Mr. Barack Obama's birth certificate from Kenya, which he previously tried to sell on e-bay and which he authenticated under penalty of perjury both on video camera and in writing. As such any allegations of suborning perjury are totally defamatory and void of any sense or reason, since Mr. Smith made this information public long before ever meeting the undersigned counsel. Therefore any and all allegations of misconduct by the undersigned are totally without merit, prejudicial and defamatory and need to be stricken from the order. 
The undersigned is the only attorney, who has the bravery of character to pursue  not only the issue of Mr. Obama's illegitimacy to presidency, but also information provided by two licensed investigators, showing that according to reputable databases Mr. Obama has used 39 different social security numbers including the social security numbers of the deceased individuals. This information is an indication of multiple felonies committed by the sitting president, and the undersigned believes that she was targeted and defamatory statements were used in order to keep her silent, to endanger her license and prevent her from proceeding on the above issues. The undersigned is deeply concerned about the fact that the court chose to include in the order slanderous ex-parte communications, while completely ignoring the above evidence against the defendant, which show a tremendous likelihood of success on a RICO claim.
10. The court has commented on the plaintiffs' inability to file a full pledged RICO complaint, calling it inexcusable. The court apparently forgot the fact that the plaintiffs have asked for discovery in order to obtain sufficient information for complete RICO complaint. The court has denied all requests for discovery, therefore making it impossible for the plaintiffs to submit fully pleaded RICO cause of action. The plaintiffs' request discovery in order to submit a properly plead RICO complaint or in the alternative a leave of court to file a second amended complaint on RICO cause of action.

11. The court relies on Ashwander vs Tenn Valley, as the reason to assert that it has no jurisdiction. This is a mistake of fact and a mistake of law. As Ashwander states "If a case can be decided on either of two grounds, one involving a constitutional question, the other a question of statutory construction of general law, the Court will decide only the latter." The fact of the matter is that there is no law or statute that provides definition of the Natural Born Citizen clause. The defense has argued a definition completely different from the definition submitted by the plaintiffs, therefore in the absence of any law or statute providing such definition Aswander actually dictates that the issue needs to be decided based on the Constitution. Central district court of California clearly has a right to interpret the Constitution, so based on the courts own argument the case has to be adjudicated. "With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it, if it is brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution." Supreme Court justice John Marshall in Cohen v Virginia 19 US 264 (1821).

12. The undersigned counsel requests the court to strike out of the order unsupported, prejudicial, demeaning and defamatory language p8, line 22-24 insinuating that the military plaintiffs in this action are cowards and writing: "The court will not interfere in internal military affairs nor be used as a tool by military officers to avoid deployment. The court has a word for such a refusal to follow the orders of the President of the United States, but it will leave the issue to the military to resolve." The undersigned has submitted to this court a letter from Captain Crawford, Legal Counsel to Admiral Malin, Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, which clearly stated that the commander in Chief is considered a civilian and there is nothing military can do regarding his eligibility. Based on this response from the military the plaintiffs have brought this matter to the Federal court to ascertain legitimacy and allegiance of the Commander in Chief, who is not a part of the military. The order completely misstated the complaint and standing justification. Recent terrorist incident at Fort Hood has given this question paramount importance. This order has advocated blind obedience by the members of the military. If someone were to have common sense, brains and strength of character to challenge allegiance of Nidal Malik Hasan in court, after he made numerous anti-American and antimilitary statements, maybe 12 young boys wouldn't be 6 feet under today, maybe 12 mothers and 12 fathers wouldn't had their hearts ripped out of their chests and torn apart. Similarly, in the oral argument the undersigned counsel didn't bring rhetoric, but rather she brought valid observations, as she pointed out to Mr. Obama's actions from the beginning of his rein, when he almost immediately cut veteran's health benefits by $500 million a year, while giving $900 million to Gaza, which is governed by a terrorist organization Hamas, which announced war on the United States of America. She argued that it is important to proceed with Mr. Obama's eligibility action expeditiously and ascertain his Natural Born Status and allegiance expeditiously as tremendous harm can be done to this Nation and this military by one with questionable status and questionable allegiance. Therefore, the plaintiffs request all of the above language stricken and the standing reconsidered. 

13. The court has misstated the main argument of the case. The court states that the court has no jurisdiction to remove duly elected president. That is a complete misinterpretation of the plaintiffs' argument, probably done by the biased clerk. In reality the whole argument and plea, is for the court to decide, whether the person residing in the White House is duly elected. If he got there by virtue of massive fraud, he had no right to be there and people who voted for him had no right to vote for him. The plaintiffs asked for the judicial determination, for the declaratory relief. If the court finds that fraud was committed, then not only Mr. Obama should be criminally prosecuted, but he will also be liable to about 20 percent of the population of this country who voted for him and particularly to the ones that contributed to his campaign. Just as when one forges a deed to a house, the rightful owner is justified in going to court for as long as it takes to achieve justice and remove the forger and the thief from his house. No judge will be justified in intimidating or sanctioning the owner of the house for going to court to seek resolution on the merits.  Similarly, 'we the people' are the rightful owners of the White House and we have the right to go to the authorities and the courts to seek the resolution on the merits for as long as it takes and to remove one who got there by virtue of fraud. It is ludicrous to believe that any judge has any justification to attack us, to sanction us for what is clearly our constitutional right. Saying that no citizen in the country has standing and no court has standing is error of law. This court has erred in not taking into account the October 5th  oral argument by the undersigned attorney in  that California Choice of law rules require District of Columbia Law be applied to DC defendants. Constitution is a contract between 'we the people' and the government. Natural Born citizen clause is an integral part of this contract. California Supreme court adopted the rule laid out in §187 of the restatement of the Conflict of Laws.. Under §188, the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the transaction at issue is applied. California has adopted the rule of §188. Edwards v. United States Fidelity and Guar. Co., 848 F. Supp. 1460 (ND Cal. 1994); Stonewall Surplus lines Ins. Co v Johnson Controls. Inc., 14 Cal. App. 4th 637, 17 Cal. Rptr.2d 713(1993). This  is a case with diversity of parties and the court can make a determination of a choice of law. As such Your Honor can and has to choose DC law, which includes Quo Warranto provision. The interest of judicial economy and National Defense as well as the interest of National security particularly in light of latest slaughter of 13 soldiers at Fort Hood by Nidal Malik Hasan dictate for Your Honor to make a determination of election  of DC law and proceeding in Quo Waranto under DC statute 16-3503.

14. The court erred in not taking Judicial notice of 18 USC §1346; Intangible Rights Fraud-as individual damages are not required in Public Sector Mail and Wire Political corruption. Mr. Obama's use of multiple social security numbers, including the social security numbers of the deceased individuals, his obfuscation of all the vital records and use of computer images of records that cannot be considered genuine according to the experts constitute individual predicate acts under Civil R.I.C.O. 18 U.S.C.§§1961,1962(a)-(d), and 1964(c)., which gives standing to every member of the public at large. Denial of standing was an error of law.

15 .The court has made an erroneous and prejudicial statement regarding the service of process by the plaintiffs. It was a clear error of fact and of law. Mr. Obama has been served four times and evaded service of process.  As the original action was filed by the undersigned counsel on the Inauguration Day (prior to swearing, as Mr. Obama took a proper oath only the next day, on January 21st) by the undersigned counsel against Mr. Obama as an individual for his actions as an individual prior to the election, the undersigned counsel has properly served Mr. Obama as an individual under rule 4e and properly demanded from the court a default judgment and post default discovery. As the court refused to grant the default judgment, the  undersigned properly demanded certification for the interlocutory appeal. As Mr. Obama did not respond to the service of process and couldn't send a US attorney to represent him, a game was played and US attorney has showed up at July 13 hearing de-facto representing Mr. Obama and arguing on his behalf, while claiming that Mr. Obama was not served and that the US attorney represents United States of America-party of interest. If the issue wouldn't be so serious for the National Security of the country, the whole charade would have been laughable. After all US attorneys were supposed to represent 'we the people' and were supposed to join the plaintiffs, protecting them from massive fraud, not cover up for the defendant. Assistant US attorney, Mr. DeJute demanded that the undersigned counsel serve Mr. Obama through the US attorney's office, thereby giving Mr. Obama an opportunity to get legal defense at the taxpayers' expense. The undersigned attorney properly protested, stating that Mr. Obama was properly served as an individual in regards to fraud that he committed as an individual prior to the election and therefore he is not entitled to be represented by the US attorneys at taxpayers' expense. Your honor did not state that the undersigned was wrong in her assessment, but rather stated in presence of 50 observers, that if the undersigned does not serve Mr. Obama the way the government wants, the US attorney will appeal and the case will be sitting in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for a year, that if the undersigned counsel agrees to serve Mr. Obama the way the government wants, Your Honor promises that the case will be heard on the merits and will not be dismissed on technicality. The undersigned counsel has protested and raised concerns that, based on prior cases, she is afraid that the US Attorney's office will try to dismiss on technicality such as standing or jurisdiction, and the case will not be heard on the merits. Again in front of 50 spectators Your Honor assured that this court has jurisdiction and it is important for this case to be decided not on default judgment, but on the merits, that it is important for the military to know if the Commander in Chief is legitimate, it is important for the whole country. If he is legitimate he can stay in the White House, if he is not legitimate, he needs to be removed from there. Under duress and tremendous pressure from Your Honor the undersigned counsel has agreed to serve US attorney with the complaint. Her worst fears materialized, as not only Your  Honor has dismissed the case claiming lack of jurisdiction, but the whole issue was completely misrepresented and the undersigned counsel was denigrated. In the above matter the court erred both in the fact and the law. Mr. Obama should have lost this case on the default judgment, post judgment discovery was supposed to be ordered and all the vital records of Mr. Obama could have been unsealed back in July and August, and this whole nightmare for the whole Nation should have been over 3 months ago. As it stands now, the undersigned counsel, her clients, all of the spectators present in the courtroom and the whole Nation justifiably feel defrauded not only by Mr. Obama, but also by this court.

16. The court erred in not including in the order and not considering an affidavit of Sandra Ramsey Lines, submitted by the plaintiffs as part of the attachment in Dossier #1 and Dossier #6, as Ms Lines, one of the most renown forensic document expert stated in her affidavit that Mr. Obama's short form Certification of Live Birth cannot be considered genuine without analyzing the original currently sealed in the Health Department in Hawaii. Court also erred in omitting from the final order affidavits of licensed investigators Neil Sankey and Susan Daniels. Court erred in refusing to lift the stay of discovery and granting a motion to dismiss, whereby  the court de facto aided and abetted obstruction of Justice by Mr. Obama.

17. The court has misrepresented the allegations in the pleadings. On page 2 line 10 The court states that the complaint pleadings talk about Mr. Obama's citizenship status and his birth in Kenya. This is a misstatement of law and complete misstatement of the pleadings and Oral argument. The undersigned has submitted for Judicial notice The Law of Nations by Emer De Vattel, specifically arguing that regardless of where Mr. Obama was born, he was never qualified for presidency, and he admitted it, as he admitted that he had British Citizenship at birth based on the citizenship of his father. Later he acquired Kenyan and Indonesian citizenship, therefore he did not  qualify as a Natural Born Citizen, as from birth and until now he had allegiance to other Nations. Natural born citizen is one born in the country to parents (both of them) who are Citizens of the country. This definition was widely used by the framers of the Constitution and was quoted by Chief Justice John Jay and the framer of the 14th amendment John A Bingham.

18. The court erred in its statement that the court is precluded from robbing the D.C. court of jurisdiction as to any quo warranto writ against president Obama because the D.C. Code grants exclusive jurisdiction to the District court of Columbia.. This an error of law, since the DC code states that the Quo Warranto may be brought in D.C., it does not state that it is an exclusive jurisdiction, it does not state that another district court cannot try DC residents including the President under DC statutes and there is no notion in the DC court that proceeding in another court under Quo Warranto will somehow rob the D.C. court. The DC code provides quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the district usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military.  DC code §16-3501-16-3503(emphases added). The word may does not mean exclusive jurisdiction, and as such the undersigned counsel was absolutely correct in her assertion that this court has proper jurisdiction to proceed under quo warranto and she prays that Your Honor proceeds immediately and expeditiously with denying the defendants motion to dismiss Quo Warranto cause of action and grants the plaintiffs lift of stay of discovery so they can complete the discovery by the January 26 trial date.

19. The court has made an error of fact and completely misstated the FOIA complaint. Pp26-27. For lack of better words it simply put the FOIA complaint on its head. The undersigned counsel did not state that the FOIA requests need to be send to the defendants, who are individuals, but simply said that in the period of nearly a year she has sent requests for information and request to take proper action to numerous agencies around the country, requesting information about the defendants, and since Mr. Obama has sealed all of his vital records by the executive order on the first day of office, further FOIA requests would be futile. The undersigned counsel has submitted voluminous dossiers 1-6 as attachments and showed the court that she undertook a Herculean effort to obtain proper information from the Department of Justice, State department, FBI, CIA, Secret Service, Social Security Administration, Selective Service to name a few. She visited governmental offices all over the country, including CA, Washington DC, KY, TN, WA, TX and others. Simply put there is a wall of silence and lack of response from all of the agencies and therefore a judicial determination and an order of discovery from the trial judge is needed.  As there is an error of fact in the order, the undersigned counsel requests to deny the defendants motion to dismiss, and to lift the stay of discovery, so the plaintiffs can complete the proper discovery and proceed on FOIA cause of action at the scheduled trial date of January 26.

20 .The court erred in its assertion that Mr. Obama has submitted his birth certificate. The whole point is that he submitted a photo shopped computer image of a short version Certification of Life Birth, obtained in 2007, that does not provide the name of the hospital, name of the doctor or signatures. Mr. Obama has sealed his original birth certificate. State of Hawaii allows one to get a birth certificate based on an uncorroborated statement of one relative only, as such there is a need to unseal the original birth certificate, birthing file and other vital records in order to ascertain his Natural Born Status.

21 .The court has made an error of law in regards to the declaratory relief cause of action. From p.16 to p.25 the court proceeds with a voluminous argument on jurisdiction to remove the president and at the end of the argument makes a huge leap and lumps declaratory relief together with the injunctive relief in one denial. Even if one were to assume arguendo that the court has no power to remove Mr. Obama from office, it has absolutely nothing to do with the Declaratory Relief.  In the declaratory relief the plaintiffs are simply looking for the judicial determination of the meaning of the Natural Born Citizen and factual determination, whether Mr. Obama possess proper vital records and citizenship status to qualify as a Natural Born Citizen. This is an issue of first impression, it is ripe and it is of the paramount importance for the country as a whole and particularly for the military that needs to take orders from Mr. Obama as the Commander in Chief. Judicial determination in the form of the declaratory relief is the exclusive domain of the judiciary, it is an Article 3 issue. The Congress has absolutely no power to issue declaratory relief, it has no power to interpret the Constitution, and regardless of the mechanism by which Mr Obama will be later removed from office: Quo Warranto or impeachment, the judicial determination, the declaratory relief has to be done now and it has to be done here. As such the undersigned counsel prays that your Honor deny the defendants motion to dismiss Declaratory Relief cause of action and grant the lift of discovery so that the undersigned counsel can complete her discovery on the Declaratory Relief cause of action by the January 26 date, set for the jury trial.

22. Lastly the court erred in fact of law and fact on the issue of the political doctrine, justiciability and separation of powers. The defense would like to turn this issue into the political doctrine, however it is not an issue of politics, it is an issue of fraud committed prior to taking office. The plaintiffs were not seeking to enjoin any particular decisions of the executive branch, but rather fraud committed by one in order to become the Chief Executive. As the undersigned read to the court a letter written by Senator Sessions of Alabama, the Congress is relying on the courts to resolve the issue of eligibility. The Congress and Senate do not have any power to ascertain whether Mr. Obama is eligible according to the Constitution. They are relying on you, Your Honor, to make a Judicial Determination, provide declaratory relief and they can take action upon your determination. In undying words of Chief Judge John Marshall, not exercising jurisdiction, when it is available, is treason to the Constitution. Therefore there is not only a potential for justiciability, but obligation to take action based on justiciability. In which way can jurisdiction and justiciability be asserted? Clearly these are uncharted waters, however if this Nation would have been afraid to enter uncharted water, it would have never sent a man to the Moon. If we could send a man to the Moon, we can figure out the issues of the separation of powers, justiciability and jurisdiction. In the humble opinion of the undersigned proper cause of action provided several avenues: (a) declaratory relief on Mr. Obama's Natural born status; (b) forwarding the findings to Congress for their decision on impeachment; (c) forwarding the finding to a special prosecutor; (d) forwarding the findings of fraud, social security fraud, identity theft-if found, to the Department of Justice and Social Security administration for further handling and ultimate enforcement (e). all of the above.  After many years of test taking in medicine and law, the undersigned believes that all of the above is the most comprehensive, all encompassing answer.

WHEREFORE, for all of the foregoing reasons Plaintiffs respectfully request their motion for reconsideration granted and the defendants motion to dismiss denied, or in the alternative the plaintiffs seek the leave of court to file a second amended complaint against Mr. Obama specifically on Declaratory Relief, R.I.C.O, Quo Warranto, 1983, Common Law Fraud and Breach of Contract (Constitution of the United States Of America, Article 2, Section 1 being subject matter of the material breach).

Respectfully submitted,

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (California Bar 223433) Attorney for the Plaintiffs

NOVEMBER 9, 2009

 

My name is Orly Taitz. I am over 18 years old, am of sound mind and free of any mental disease or psychological impairment of any kind or condition.
I am a citizen of the United States of America and a resident of the state of California.
I am an attorney and an officer of the court licensed in all courts of the state of California, Supreme Court of the United States, Federal District Court in the central District of the State of California and  have practiced pro hac vice in the states of Texas, Pennsylvania and Georgia.
This declaration is made in response to the October 29th order in above captioned case.
During the October 5 hearing in the above mentioned case Judge David O. Carter stated that I encouraged my supporters to call him in order to influence his decision.
I declare under penalty of perjury that this is not true.
During the hearing I tried to protest this defamatory allegation against me and asked to speak.  However, Judge Carter refused to let me speak and respond to this allegation.
In the same order on page 29, Judge Carter has stated that he received letters with affidavits, claiming that I asked potential witnesses to perjure themselves.
I declare that this is absolutely and categorically not true, and it constitutes an outrageous defamatory and slanderous accusation.  Those letters were ex parte communications, highly prejudicial against me and my clients and I had no opportunity to respond and deny those accusations.
10.I believe that the court referred to the letters from Larry Sinclair and Lucas Smith. Both parties were contacted and asked to be witnesses during the motion hearing on September 8, 2009.

11. I have asked Larry Sinclair to authenticate an affidavit he submitted to the Chicago police regarding the homicide of Mr. Donald Young. In fact, the statements to which Mr. Sinclair would testify are already a matter of public record.

In the affidavit submitted to the Chicago Police and in his book, recently published, Mr. Sinclair stated that Mr. Donald Young contacted him repeatedly and told Mr. Sinclair that he had a lengthy homosexual relationship with Mr. Obama.
The affidavit further said that Mr. Young was found dead, shot in the back of his head at the onset of the Democratic primaries for 2008 presidential election.
Any allegation that I asked Mr. Sinclair to perjure himself is not only completely defamatory, but lacks any sense or reason, as Mr. Sinclair's affidavit regarding Mr. Young's homicide can be found filed with the Chicago police department and in his book, that can be purchased on the Internet.
12. I asked Mr. Lucas Smith to authenticate Kenyan birth certificate for Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, which he previously tried to sell to the highest bidder on E-bay. Again, any allegations that I asked Mr. Smith to perjure himself is absolutely not true, defamatory and ludicrous, as he made this information available to the public long before he ever met me.
13.  As of now I am the only attorney with the courage, integrity and strength of character to not only bring forward information of Mr. Barack Obama not being eligible for the office of the presidency, but also to submit to court information from two licensed investigators, showing that Mr. Obama has used 39 different social security numbers according to national databases, including social security numbers of deceased individuals.

14. I am bringing forward evidence showing that Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, sitting president, is guilty of multiple felonies, for which he might need to spend the rest of his life in prison.

15. I believe that I am being targeted in an effort to silence me, which involves targeting my law license in an attempt to try to prevent me from proceeding with legal actions on the above issues.

I solemnly swear under penalty of perjury that all the facts stated and circumstances described above are true and correct statements.

Respectfully submitted,

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (California Bar 223433)

 

DONE AND EXECUTED ON THIS 16 day of November, 2009

Declaration of Orly Taitz
My name is Orly Taitz. I am over 18 years old, am of sound mind and free of any mental disease or psychological impairment of any kind or condition.

2. I am a citizen of the United States of America and a resident of the state of California.

3. I am an attorney and an officer of the court licensed in all courts of the state of California, Supreme Court of the United States, Federal District Court in the central District of the State of California and have practiced pro hac vice in the states of Texas, Pennsylvania and Georgia.

4. I am the plaintiffs’ attorney in the above captioned case. This declaration is made in response to the October 29th order in above captioned case.

5. I have done research in this case and found the following:

6. On October 1, 2009 Mr. Siddharth Velamoor, a new law clerk was hired by this court.

7. According to Martindale lawyers database Mr. Velamoor is listed as an attorney for Perkins Coie LLC

8. Perkins Coie via its senior counsel Mr. Robert Bauer acted as the defense attorney representing Mr. Obama against numerous challenges to Mr. Obama’s legitimacy to presidency, similar to the current action.

9. Perkins Coie was one of the defense firms opposing the undersigned counsel and plaintiffs in this case in Keyes et al v Bowen et al, specifically challenging Secretary of state of CA Debra Bowen who did not verify Mr. Obama’s eligibility.
Mr. Bauer from Perkins Coie has served as a counsel for Obama Campaign for America.

11. Mr. Bauer is an attorney for Obama’s Organizing for America

12.Mr. Bauer is an attorney for the Democratic National Committee.

13.Mr. Bauer’s wife Anita Dunn is the White House Communications Director.

14.According to World Net Daily magazine Mr. Obama and the Democratic National Committee have paid Perkins Coie $1,666,397.01 since the 2008 election.

15. Mr. Bauer has sent a threatening and intimidating letter to Mr. John Hemenway, a DC attorney with 30 years of experience with JAG and State Department, whereby Mr. Bauer has threatened Mr. Hemenway with sanctions and costs, if he dares to appeal a negative decision in a similar case by Judge James Robertson in the District court for the District of Columbia. In that case Judge Robertson came up with a brilliant legal argument, that there was no need to see the actual documentary evidence for Mr. Obama because his eligibility was “twittered and massaged on the blogs”.

16.I declare under penalty of perjury that all of the above are true and correct statements. Respectfully submitted

NOVEMBER 16, 2009

Dr. Orly Taitz, Attorney-at-Law
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #65 on: November 17, 2009, 05:35:09 AM »

Lew Dobbs fired from CNN because of believing the obove article.

America sleeps on.


Demand Congress stop withholding taxes now


By: Devvy
November 16, 2009

Last week the new unemployment numbers came out: 502,000 new unemployment claims. The usurper camped out in the White House gave a short speech on how to address the continuing hemorrhaging of jobs in this country: He's going to hold a "summit" next month. Isn't that clever of Obama aka Barry Soetoro? Then, he hops on his favorite toy, Air Force One, and jets out of town again to go bow to foreign governments who can collapse our economy in five minutes.
What the heck good is a "summit" next month going to do for millions of families suffering right now? There's talk of more stimulus packages to do what? Saddle us with more debt? All of these stimulus packages have done NOTHING for long term job growth in the private sector. How much more of doing the same thing that keeps failing are the American people going to sit back and swallow?
Millions of us have pounded on getting rid of the unnecessary federal income tax for decades. Congressman Ron Paul, has introduced bills in the past to get rid of the withholding taxing scheme. Always ignored by your member of Congress (and the idiot who represents me here in Texas) as they just spend, spend and spend more debt year after year after decade they're in office.
Well, how interesting that finally at least one financial expert on FOX News Network put it out there last week: Suspend the income tax. He said these are desperate times that call for desperate measures. You could have knocked me over with a feather.

There can be no recovery without jobs. Everything that has been done since Congress passed the illegal bank bail outs (signed off by Bush) - right up through the massive stealing for quick fix programs like Cash for Clunkers - are all failures, as predicted, with the end result being more debt. Go take a look at this map of bankruptcies by state.

Go look at this map in real time. Click on foreclosures, then state, then city and then watch what happens. It's staggering. 18.8 MILLION homes (defaults) stood empty during the third quarter. Shocking, and it will get worse as all these government programs do nothing but create more debt, while stealing the American people blind in taxes to pay for this lunacy.

The solution according to Congress (BOTH parties) is continued massive spending for these immoral, unconstitutional invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. Continued massive spending for unconstitutional cabinets like the Federal Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency. Heck, let's pass a $1.2 TRILLION dollar illegal disaster called health care reform. More proposed debt funded by more borrowing from the communist Chinese, Saudi's, Japanese and anyone else will throw a few billion in our beggar's cup.
The Democrats, along with a number of Republicans, want to further bankrupt the American people with the bogus 'global warming' scam and tax us into rags via another unconstitutional bill called cap and trade. The Republicans did the tax and spend us into unpayable debt from 1995 - 2006, until the Democrats took "power" and now those crooks are lining their pockets:
$23,500,000: "The upper range of net worth Rep. Allan  Mollohan (D-WV) accumulated in four years time according to The Washington Post, through earmarks of "tens of millions of dollars to groups associated with his own business partners." Twenty-three million five hundred thousands dollars. Your debt. Your child's debt. They have no future except as slaves to the Gods of DC.

$2,000,000,000: "($2 billion) the approximate amount of  money that House Appropriations Chairman David Obey (D-WI) is earmarking related to his son's lobbying  efforts. The son, Craig Obey, is "a top lobbyist for the nonprofit group" that would receive a roughly $2 billion component of the "Stimulus" package." Your debt. Mine. My elderly parents. My daughter. All of us eating this kind of corruption because the American people keep voting these scoundrels back into office.
Dennis Hastert, former Republican Speaker of the House, retired a rich, fat cat. Hastert is a clear cut example of a crook and should have gone to prison. Instead all these rats are sitting real pretty and guess who is paying for all this? You, me, our children and grand children. Massive debt in the tens of millions. We are little better than oxen under the yoke of indentured servitude. Our children will be paying Hastert's very plush retirement for decades while they go without.
35 MILLION AMERICANS ARE ON FOOD STAMPS

In a nation rich in natural and human resources. Look what Congress has done to our country over the past six decades. The states have gone along with the plundering and now we have mothers so desperate to feed their children and keep a roof over their head, they're robbing banks, for God's sake. Fathers so distraught, a half dozen have killed themselves and their entire families over financial hardship.
Millions of Americans are going hungry the last 3-4 days of the month because no matter how frugal they are, there isn't enough left from their paychecks to even buy food. I'm talking husband and wife or single people with two jobs. Moms and dads going with one meal a day at the end of the month so their children can eat two. Here in America while these lying jackals in Washington, DC do nothing but spend and tax us to death. These elites do not care about we the people. They don't care because we are nothing more than the peasant class to them.

Unemployment checks are replacing paychecks. The situation will not get any better unless jobs are created and that will not happen because Americans are saving what little they have left out of fear for the future. They aren't spending because there's nothing left to spend after their paychecks are raided to pay -- not essential and limited functions of a republican form of government - - but hundreds of billions to the "FED" for interest on the national debt and massive payments to the communist UN, the World Bank, BIS and foreign welfare.

The fruits of your labor are being stolen to build schools for the Palestinian Authority. Since 1994, the illegal USAID (United States Aid for International Development) program has thrown $2.4 billion into the Palestinian Authority. Billions stolen from we the people for what? “Reduce poverty, improve health and education, create jobs and advance democracy.” USAID is set to steal another $153 million from the American people in 2010 for the development of the Palestinian Authority's infrastructure in foreign countries.
Every time I do this kind of research, I want to literally vomit. No where in the U.S. Constitution does it authorize Congress to steal from the American people to build schools or even a fence in any foreign country. No legal authority to steal from us and our children's future to give "aid" to foreign governments to load up on military hardware - that includes Israel. To further slap we the people in the face because there is NO money in the people's purse. The Treasury is over drawn $12 TRILLION dollars. Every penny of that $153 million dollars to advance the putrid stench of democracy and create jobs in Judea and Samaria has to be borrowed from the privately owned Federal Reserve. The interest is more debt on our backs, our children and grand children.

This is change? This is just more grand larceny that both parties have been cramming down our throats for decades. Is this what you work so hard each day for - or did if you're one of the whopping 22% unemployed:

US to Give $125 Million to Upgrade Pakistan's Power Sector. October 29, 2009. "Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, seeking to bolster Islamabad's fight against Islamic extremists US corporaterrorists' profits, initiated a crash U.S. assistance program for Pakistan's power sector aimed at rolling back electricity shortages that threaten to cripple the South Asian nation's economy. Mrs. Clinton, on the first of a three-day diplomatic mission to Pakistan, said that Washington will disburse $125 million to Islamabad for the upgrading of key power stations and transmission lines. U.S. experts [!] are also beginning to work with Pakistani utility companies to reduce power outages and lost revenue caused by outmoded technologies and systemic non-payment by customers, which costs Pakistan hundreds of millions of dollars each year."

Insanity. Here -- go look at this list of spending. This is change? It is sickening beyond words.
THAT is where your "income" tax withholding is going - to pay just the interest on the national debt created by this mafia out in Washington. Trillions of dollars of it. ALL borrowed and you, me, our children and grand children are on the hook to see that a damn power plant in Pakistan gets funding for geopolitical BS.
If you are new to understanding the money trail, please take the time to read this piece I wrote. You can also download it (free) to a CD and listen while you're in commute traffic or on a plane:
Why an income tax is not necessary to fund the federal government
The Right Argument on Taxation
The rape and plundering of the American people must stop because it's a moral crime against our people, our country. It must stop because money needs to be infused into our local economies or millions more will be going hungry and thousands of small to medium businesses across this country will continue to close their doors.

It's bad enough Republicans and Democrats and every president since and including Reagan, have allowed our nation to be invaded by tens of millions of criminals (illegal aliens) stealing jobs and resources. In this time of desperation for millions of Americans, these political whores in Congress continue to allow 125,000 foreign workers into this country every month to satisfy their corporate donors while Americans are standing in unemployment lines.
It is NOT the job of the federal government to create jobs. That is what the private sector does, but you can't create jobs unless people spend. Stopping the withholding taxing scheme will not bring the government to a halt. The other taxing scams (social security and Medicare) will still be withheld. Look at what stopping the income tax would do for someone who makes $52,000 per year. They would take home an extra $600 per month in cold, hard cash. Multiply that by tens and tens of millions of paychecks. (See this important column.)

Of course, the shadow government run by the banking cartels do not want you to have that extra money. They want you to continue running debt as your way of life; drowning in it no matter how hard you try. Because that's how they have enriched their coffers: by keeping all of us slaves to fiat currency. Just think what it would mean to families and single people to have that extra $200 or $600 or $1,000 each month in take home pay? It could mean the difference between foreclosure, keeping their health care coverage and staying warm this winter.
Instead, Congress - both parties and the hustler in the White House - want to continue stealing from all of us to send to foreign governments. To provide free dental care for villages in Guiana. Tens of billions for criminals (illegal aliens) in food stamps, education and medical care. While you and your family go hungry or your children go to bed cold because you can't afford to heat your home during the night.
No more. Get on the phone today and everyday. Call your member of Congress, Republican or Democrat, and tell them: Stop the federal income tax withholding from my paycheck! Congress has the power to tax and stop taxing. Only a massive campaign of bombarding these poltroons every day with a unified voice will force them to take some action.
Oh, make no mistake. There will be the usual ignorant responses from both parties that it isn't practical, can't be done, how will the government pay its bills and so on. These are excuses and we are sick of excuses based on ignorance and/or scare tactics. Yes, it can be done by an act of Congress and it can be done quickly. We cannot stop all the massive financial wrecks coming, but we can help hold some of it back by getting Americans back to work.
Call your friends, relatives, pass this column around. Melt those phones. Everyday. Call their district offices during the Thanksgiving holiday when these rats go home.


We must make a thousand times more noise than the tea parties with our demand to stop the withholding tax. Allow Americans to take home what is rightfully theirs -- not some foreign banking cartel or government.
This is our country and we say enough!


Solutions Ignored:                                                                                   
December 12, 2000:
Paul Calls for an End to Withholding Taxes

April 4, 2001.
Congressman Paul Introduces Legislation to Abolish Withholding Taxes

January 29, 2009:
Ron Paul Introduces Tax Free Tips Act
Better to know the truth:
1 - Job losses demystified
2 - Obama creates 640,329 jobs. — Cost: $323,739.83 per job
3 - Dead Government Walking
4 - Bloodbath Coming in the US Banking Sector
5 - Be Prepared for the Worst -- it's coming
6 - Great Myths of the Great Depression
7 - U.S. foreclosures spike in new regions in 3rd qtr


Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party.

Visit Devvy's web site at: http://www.devvy.com. You can also sign up for her free email alerts.

Copyright © 2009 Devvy Kidd
All rights reserved.
Logged

WillowRun

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 102
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #66 on: November 30, 2009, 11:42:43 AM »

Some one up thread mentioned Mike Huckabee as a presidential candidate.  I am from Arkansas.  I never voted for Huckabee when he was governor. I didn't vote for him in the last presidential primary season...  The headline at abc news at 1:37 p.m. cst:  How Many Criminals Has Huckabee Helped Free?  This man is not fit to lead this country.   FYI Wayne DuMond actually killed two women after his release.  He died in jail before they could charge him with the second killing... 

And for Mr. Huckabee to call the killing of the four police officers in Washington state a failure of the police in both states????  That is just an outright lie.  If  Maurice Clemmons was still in jail in Arkansas, this would never have happened.

Huckabee isn't fit to lead anyone not even a dog on leash!

Huckabee Helped Set Rapist Free Who Later Killed Missouri Woman
Former Arkansas Governor, Under Fire for Springing Alleged Lakewood Shooter Maurice Clemmons, Also Pushed for Release of Wayne Dumond
By MARK SCHONE
Nov. 30, 2009 —


Any political ambitions of former Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee could be hurt by his role in freeing Maurice Clemmons, the gunman suspected in the execution murders of four police officers in Washington State -- especially since Clemmons would not be the first criminal Huckabee helped to free who later committed murder.

Clemmons was serving 95 years when Huckabee, then governor of Arkansas, commuted his sentence in 2000. Clemmons is now being sought in the murders of four Lakewood, Wash. police officers, who were ambushed and shot in a coffee shop Sunday morning.

Four years earlier, Huckabee also pushed for the parole of rapist Wayne Dumond despite chilling testimonies from victims and their relatives that he was a dangerous criminal who would strike again. Ashley Stevens, a 17-year-old cheerleader when Dumond raped her, told ABC News in 2007 that she put her face inches from Huckabee's and said, "This is how close I was to Wayne Dumond, and I will never forget his face, and you will never forget mine. He's the one that raped me."

Click here to read Brian Ross' 2007 report and watch his report on Good Morning America by clicking here.



But Dumond, serving a life sentence for raping Stevens, was released in 1999 following reported public and private efforts by Huckabee on his behalf. Within a year of his release, he was accused of raping and murdering two more women. He was convicted of raping and murdering one of the women and returned to jail, where he died in 2005.

Video: Brian Ross talks to Mike Huckabee about the release of Wayne Dumond

Prior to his imprisonment for rape, Dumond's record included a conviction for assault and his alleged involvement in a slaying and one other rape. Stevens, the victim in the 1985 rape for which he was convicted, was a distant relative of Bill Clinton's, and Dumond became a cause celebrity among some who thought he had been dealt with harshly because of the victim's relationship to then-Governor Clinton. Huckabee had originally indicated a desire to commute Dumond's sentence, but decided not to after unfavorable public response.

Dumond's Victims Begged Huckabee Not To Release Him
Documentation of Dumond's dangerousness -- including graphic, emotional letters from his alleged victims and their family members -- was in Huckabee's gubernatorial files at the time he was advocating Dumond's release. The news Web site Huffington Post obtained copies of two letters from women who said they were raped by Dumond that were allegedly sent to the governor's office.

After first denying the letters were genuine, a spokesperson for Huckabee now confirms at least one of these letters was received by his office.

The documents were provided to a reporter several years ago by a Huckabee aide, according to the Huffington Post.

In one, a woman tells of how Dumond raped her daughter, while her three-year-old grandchild looked on.

"I am also a rape victim of Dumond's," reads another heavily-underlined, bolded letter to Huckabee from the file. "Please reconsider your decision to release Dumond."

Huckabee even met with Ashley Stevens, whose rape had put Dumond behind bars in 1985.

Shortly afterward, in a 1996 closed-door session with the state parole board, Huckabee urged them to recommend Dumond be freed, according to the one member who voted against the release.

"He said the case I want to talk to you about is Wayne Dumond, and this is a guy who may have grown up on the wrong side of the tracks and may have gotten a raw deal," said professor Charles Chastain of the University of Ark. at Little Rock's Criminal Justice Department. "Immediately the other board members who voted on that case decided, apparently, if the governor wants it, he gets it."

Huckabee described the meeting differently.

"At their invitation I went to their meeting, someone brought up his case," he said. "Frankly it was simply part of a broader discussion. I did not ask them to do anything."

Huckabee also told ABC News that it was "ludicrous" to think he could influence the parole board at the time because the members of the board were appointed by his Democratic predecessors, Jim Guy Tucker and Bill Clinton.

But Butch Reeves, formerly the criminal justice counsel to the Arkansas governor's office, who handled all requests for clemencies and communications with prisoners, gave an account of the meeting that largely supports former board member Chastain's version.

Criminal Justice System In Question
In a phone interview with ABC News, Reeves said Huckabee told the board members he thought there was "something nefarious" about the criminal justice system in Dumond's case, and that the rapist got a "raw deal." Huckabee said he believed Dumond's sentence, originally a life sentence plus 20 years, was "way out of bounds" for his crime, raping a 17-year-old high school student.

Reeves said he could recall only a few such appeals being made by a governor.

"The record clearly shows now Mike Huckabee did advocate for Wayne Dumond's release," said David J. Sanders, a political columnist for Stephens Media in Arkansas. "I think there are real questions about whether he has been forthright on this issue."

Huckabee was criticized during the 2008 presidential primaries for his clemency record. According to the Associated Press, Huckabee granted 1,033 clemencies during his 10 years in office. That figure is more than twice the total racked up by his three predecessors as governor in 17 years.

In 2007, Huckabee told ABC News that he believed that the media's attention to the Dumond story was a "complete exploitation."

The mother of Carol Sue Shields, the woman Dumond raped and killed in Missouri, told ABC News at the time that she would do "whatever it takes" to stop Huckabee from becoming president.

"I can't imagine anybody wanting somebody like that running the country," said Lois Davidson.

After the Lakewood shootings Sunday, Huckabee posted a statement on his Web site. If Clemmons is found to be responsible for the shooting, he wrote, "It will be the result of a series of failures in the criminal justice system."

Click here to read Huckabee's complete statement.

Huckabee is now the host of a talk show on Fox News and has downplayed his interest in running for president again in 2012, despite polls that show he remains popular among Republican voters.



Logged
Respectfully,

Willow

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #67 on: November 30, 2009, 05:27:45 PM »

Willow,
Lets open some more details here before this sort of judgement is passed on Huckabee.

First of all, He is subject as Governor that works for the people.
 
Huckabee is not a doctor to decide anybody's stability.

Huckabee was not on a board of directors that decide whether there is eligibility for parole. He was not the one that decided the decisions of choices that let these people out of prison. It is all that are elected under him. He is the signer of all who already made the decisions. As Governor he was not the doctors, he was not the board or the people that had to agree before the final signing was put in front of him.

Huckabee had to officiate on other people's in office that directed His decision and that is that and the truth of all. He cannot go against a jury unless there is proof beyond doubt. The doubt was taken care of by the officials that were in charge of this Lunatic.

 Now with that said, Can you imagine a leftist using a lunatic to knock a well rounded person that is already in first place for a better presidency. Now something had to be done about that didn't it. Who knows the folly of evil. Governors are  signers of finality brought on by officials of all offices. He did not take on all these hats to do his own thing and it is quite simpleton to think he does. Attorney's and doctors and boards would have to go in and prove beyond all doubt that is was OK. Mike Huckabee is not a stupid man but a signer of elected offices that are elected to the jobs they have been trained for. He also cannot go against a wailing victim when professionals have already given their decisions. Its the law and Mike Huckabee follows the law and constitution and am sure glad he does. He is a good man. But this is a trick to discredit his goodness. So there is more ways then one and one should know the political ends of things before all reasoning is made. My question is why and for what reason and how did a lunitic know to do this when it takes good mind plan and be able to accomplish this at the right time and place?  It will all be in the books in the end the evil that is planned against right doing. and for sure something needs to change the most difficult office that the United States has had yet. 

Even though a person is from the same state as governor does not mean you know everything a govenors job is. We have a terrible govenor in our state and I know what he does!
Logged

WillowRun

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 102
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #68 on: November 30, 2009, 05:46:59 PM »

Tinka:

Lets get some things straight about Mike Huckabee.  He is a political opportunist.  Nothing more.   He IS responsible for the death's caused by Wayne DuMond and those attributed to Mr. Clemmons.  These men weren't paroled.  They received a governor's pardon....Please read carefully before you reply.  Six people are dead due to this man's errors in judgement...

And further more.  I AM FROM Arkansas. I've watched the Huckster since 1993....During his term as governor, he pardoned or gave clemency to more criminals than the three governors who preceeded him.  

I stand by my statement.  That man isn't fit to lead a dog on a leash....

edited to add:  This isn't a right left thing...it's a right wrong thing...just because someone is a republican doesn't make them right or just or annointed of God.  And...some of the biggest shysters and opportunists there are hide their evil deeds behind a church pulpit.  

And if you read this carefully, you might full comprehend the damage that Huckabee has done to my state.  I won't live in my home town anymore because of the hispanic gangs.  I had to find a school system safe for my girls.  The day to day lives of Arkansas have not been made easier by Mike Huckabee they've been made harder...his parting gift to Arkansas??? A taxpayer funded Mexican Consulate in Little Rock.  We have a rosary beads hanging from our rear view mirror.  Why?  You ask?  Because it's not safe for white people in many parts of Springdale my home town.  We've had more than one encounter which looked like it might be unpleasant until the young men saw the rosary, they became very respectful.  They don't respect you as people  just as "fellow catholics"  whatever works I suppose.  



« Last Edit: November 30, 2009, 06:37:53 PM by WillowRun »
Logged
Respectfully,

Willow

WillowRun

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 102
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #69 on: November 30, 2009, 06:39:36 PM »

Tinka:

Lets get some things straight about Mike Huckabee.  He is a political opportunist.  Nothing more.   He IS responsible for the death's caused by Wayne DuMond and those attributed to Mr. Clemmons.  These men weren't paroled.  They received a governor's pardon....Please read carefully before you reply.  Six people are dead due to this man's errors in judgement...

And further more.  I AM FROM Arkansas. I've watched the Huckster since 1993....During his term as governor, he pardoned or gave clemency to more criminals than the three governors who preceeded him.  

I stand by my statement.  That man isn't fit to lead a dog on a leash....

edited to add:  This isn't a right left thing...it's a right wrong thing...just because someone is a republican doesn't make them right or just or annointed of God.  And...some of the biggest shysters and opportunists there are hide their evil deeds behind a church pulpit.  

And if you read this carefully, you might fully comprehend the damage that Huckabee has done to my state.  I won't live in my home town anymore because of the hispanic gangs.  I had to find a neighborhood and school system safe for my girls.  The day to day lives of Arkansas have not been made easier by Mike Huckabee they've been made harder...his parting gift to Arkansas??? A taxpayer funded Mexican Consulate in Little Rock.  We have a rosary beads hanging from our rear view mirror.  Why?  You ask?  Because it's not safe for white people in many parts of Springdale my home town.  We've had more than one encounter which looked like it might be unpleasant until the young men saw the rosary, they became very respectful.  They don't respect you as people  just as "fellow catholics"  whatever works I suppose.  




Logged
Respectfully,

Willow

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #70 on: November 30, 2009, 08:49:10 PM »

Willow,
I am not closing my mind to any of your statements but will try to run some of it down. although It was supposed to be proven that on this last dude that he was released by the judges that superseeded when Huckabee gave 43 year more sentence but that led to release by misfunction of prosecuters which led to judges ruling and advising of release to Huckabee.  Now a days you really cannot trust much but it is also very devestating to see our course that we are in now. Anything almost seems better then this. I am not even sure that Huckabee will actually run but my choice for what is there now at the moment would be Palins agenda but still not sure we should have a woman leader. I believe I saw some scripture about that. I do like her though. I believe she is all American, and tough when the tough get going. She seems to have voice for the middle people and a whole lot of common sense.
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #71 on: February 21, 2010, 06:40:57 AM »

Is everything here true or false? For your own discretion

Beginning video about BHO being with OUR CIA 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WedxY61d60&feature=PlayList&p=DF32612E6A89587C&index=0
 
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #72 on: February 21, 2010, 11:59:31 AM »

Part 1   Dr. Manning video treason trial for BHO
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLx0Kb3MB8c&NR=1
>
> Part 2   Dr. Manning video treason trial for BHO
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF0nQ-d4Z-I&NR=1
<P><HR></P>
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #73 on: March 06, 2010, 06:53:43 AM »

Here are 6 video links seen in below artcle!  Is this believable and will it or will it not happen to America? Each link will be there for you to click on but a couple seem to overlap in info but listen to the end and decide for yourself.


 "THE BROOKS REPORT"
 
THANKS TO:
From: J Richard Niemela

FOR ALL>>>More and more articles such as the one following these words are appearing  about our current White House occupant ---  appearing on the internet, almost all derogatory in nature, most pointing to the lack of qualifications, appearances of disloyalty to the nation, associations with extreme leftist types in his past, and otherwise, producing views that if they had appeared before the last national election, would certainly have either disqualified him for office or voters would have been turned off by them..
 
Yet, it is obvious that the controlled Media, admittedly mostly Talmudic/Zionist owned and run, stays with him; none ever report on the derogatory comments that are increasingly anti his presidency and his qualifications for office..The Why of this Media support certainly must be viewed as intentional, a total disregard of the facts related to Obama's past, to his birth nation, to his schooling, who paid for it, who organized it, etc...
 
Certainly there has to have been and likely still exists,  those who have been guiding his life from behind the scenes..None of his accomplishments can be attributed to his own qualifications, ie, getting into Harvard Law school with such obscure credentials...Thus, someone, some group of individuals such as some members of the Council on Foreign Relations, had to have provided both political and financial support, and other enabling tactics to insure his rise to such national recognition....Despite the many unusual steps along his life's way that had to be cloaked and disguised to insure that he made the list, so to speak, of presidential candidates down the road..
 
The efforts of those "behind the curtain", have paid off, so far, but, perhaps they had a more serious, nefarious purpose in promoting such a likely alien, a Black leftist, someone who would certainly find approval from almost all the nations' Blacks and the noisy liberals who would see in him, a comrade, a supportive leader that would promote their views and enact laws that aided their hopes for changes on environmental issues, etc.  Knowing too, that despite his many pre-election promises made during the campaign, to secure the election, none have been met and likely will not be met.. creating thereby, added animosity towards his time in office!
 
What in effect is developing however, many be "exactly" what those sitting "behind the curtain" have planned for; a serious split between Blacks and Whites, Conservatives and Liberals, so obvious and noisy,  that should some unusual event happen, one used before by these same sitters behind the curtain,  the nation would erupt into a bloody turmoil...and that may be why we have been subjected to and blinded by, an individual whose actions if removed from office, one way or another,  would stir up enough internal animosity that would trigger the planned turmoil, necessary then, to introduce  Martial Law on the nation...
 
Those others, "in the know",  government officials acting, reputedly, on behalf of the nations' necesary cohesiveness and sanctity, would react just as planned!  As quiet allies; to those "behind the curtain," as those "joined unto them," to cite a biblical term, kinsmen in some instances, who now sit in key political and administrative appointed positions, would see this time as concluding age-old hopes for a dominion over nations.  Achieved by the clever and deceitful use of the last "Cash Cow", the final World Empire that can be taken down through internal changes and troubles sufficient to enable them reach a goal long sought, spurred on by control of international economic problems and their own control of international finances.
 
Such a goal was once tried though the use of another "Christian" nation, Russia, but this plan failed, although it may have simply been a "dry run" of 50+ years, being but a rehearsal for the final push that would finally involve a nation composed of that ancient enemy, Jacob, the nation composed of the many ancient tribes/nations that once came from this progenitor of ancient Israel.   Those people whom the Bible labels as the "Lost Sheep of the House of Israel"...not really lost, but kept that way by an internal enemy and blinded Christian Zionists, but a people now being recognized as having concluded their ancient historic trek over the ages that culminated in North America and other related nations.    A people now awakening to Who is Who in this world today -- awakening as well, to Who is their opposition,  those anciently known as coming from Esau, who is Edom...
 
The facts of history cannot be cloaked or skewed as they have been done for the past several generations..Events that are shaping the nation today, were prophetically forecast centuries ago, and now, those who understand history and events, can see them coming into fruition..Pay attention to events and those being Divinely generated, as the time is close, the coming changes prophesied.  And Divine intervention is predicted to occur, dramatic in its purpose.
 
J.Richard Niemela
 
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:46 AM
Subject: the truth will out
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Obama, a College Marxist?
Deborah Lambert, February 22, 2010

Until now, precious little information has come to light about
President Obama’s youthful political views. That may change as
disclosures by former political science professor Dr. John C. Drew
eventually surface in the mainstream press.

During an evening he spent with Obama in late 1980, Drew, a former
Marxist-turned-conservative-Republican, recalled during an interview
on Breitbart TV’s “The B-cast” that the young Obama was not only a
passionate Marxist, but a Marxist-Leninist, devoted to the
revolutionary overthrow of the capitalist system in America.

The meeting occurred in late December, 1980 when Drew, a 1979
Occidental College graduate in his second year of Cornell University
grad school, visited his girlfriend, still an Occidental student, who
shared a political theory class with Obama.

Drew recalled that Obama, then a college sophomore, showed up in a BMW
with his closest friend Mohammed Hasan Chandoo, and “we all went out
to dinner, partied and drank, smoked cigarettes—and we did what young
Marxists do—we basically argued politics.”

Before the get-together, his then-girlfriend described Obama as “one
of us.” What she meant by that was that “he was on our team . . . a
blood brother . . .a fellow revolutionary,” said Drew.

As a serious Marxist revolutionary himself in those days, Drew said
that as soon as he met young Barack, he realized that this radical
college sophomore wasn’t just “dabbling in Marxism . . . he was a
Marxist-Leninist dedicated to the overthrow of the capitalist system.”

Drew says on his website
(www.anonymouspoliticalscientist.blogspot.com) that his “most vivid
memory of Obama was the way he strongly argued a rather simple-minded
version of Marxist theory,” while he (Drew) had moved on to a more
pessimistic graduate school view that true revolution would never
happen in this country.

Drew’s meeting with the young Obama occurred shortly after he
experienced his first taste of campus notoriety when publicly speaking
out on the anti-apartheid issue and co-founding the anti-apartheid
group that is mentioned in Dreams of My Father.

During their meeting, Drew recalls that Obama believed that “America
was definitely the enemy, and American elites were the enemy, and
whatever America was doing was definitely wrong and bad. He thought
that perhaps the Soviet Union was misunderstood, and it was doing a
better job for its people than most people realized,” Drew noted in a
Newsmax interview.

Although Drew did his senior honors thesis at Occidental on Marxist
Economics, his doctoral research at Cornell in 1984 triggered a move
to the political right when he realized the fallacy of the Marxist
class struggle argument.

However, when Drew crossed the ideological divide from Marxist to
conservative Republican, it may have made his academic career a bit
more challenging.

As an assistant political science professor at Williams College from
1986 – 1989, Drew was one of three registered Republicans on the
faculty. Armed with his newly adopted belief system, Drew says he
complained to the powers-that-be about the school’s affirmative action
policies that favored less qualified African-American faculty
candidates over white candidates, saying that these policies “took
away the honor of being a Williams College professor.”

Now a grant-writing consultant in Laguna Niguel, California, Drew says
that his meeting with Obama some 30 years ago provided useful evidence
of why he was able to win the trust and support of people like Bill
Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, and Alice Palmer. He believes that Obama
“never surrendered that tough, Marxist socialist ideology I saw in him
as a sophomore at Occidental College.”

When Drew is asked why he took so long to go public with this story,
he is quick to explain that although he tried to get the story out
during the presidential campaign in 2008, no one in the media would
touch it.

In fact, Drew says he was frustrated when he couldn’t get this
information out during campaign season, since candidate Obama “was
making it sound like people thought he was a socialist because he
didn’t share his toys in kindergarten, but I thought he was a
socialist because I’d seen him argue from a hard Marxist point of
view.”

Obama’s career path was entirely predictable, according to Drew, who
says the first logical career move for a revolutionary right out of
college is to become a labor organizer or a community organizer. The
second step is to become a college professor.

During his stint as a University of Chicago adjunct professor, Obama
“was basically promoting the socialist revolution, saying that our
Constitution promotes negative liberties but not the positive
liberties of a society that advocates wealth distribution.”

Drew’s encounter with the future president nearly 30 years ago sheds
some light on the young Obama’s political ideology, one of the many
aspects of his life that has not undergone any serious scrutiny by the
mainstream press. Drew regards his “15 minutes of fame” that began
with a Newsmax interview in February, 2010 as an “opportunity to share
what I know about the ‘red diaper’ ideology of the young Barack
Obama.”

Saying that he would still be teaching in Massachusetts were it not
for the liberal Democrats that control Williams College, Drew says he
was pleased that Scott Brown was recently elected as the state’s
newest senator, adding that his election “marks the end of the Obama
revolution.”

Deborah Lambert writes the Squeaky Chalk column for Accuracy in Academia.
Logged

calvin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
Re: Political facts happening in case some SDA's wants to know
« Reply #74 on: March 11, 2010, 12:06:52 PM »

Well Tinka I see you are making vast improvements on your copy/pasting skills. Do you have any original thoughts of you own on these far-right ultra-conservative extremist whackos you keep copying from?  Or do you just believe and regurgitate everything they tell you?

BTW, how is that whole Obama birther movement thing coming along that you posted about upon his election?  According you and your buddies, we should be seeing Obama removed from office any day now for non-citizenship.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 13   Go Up