Advent Talk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Go and check out the Christians Discuss Forum for committed Christians at  http://www.christians-discuss.com

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 11   Go Down

Author Topic: Brandy has left Danny  (Read 110596 times)

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

Cindy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 567
  • "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good"
    • 3A Talk Forum
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #75 on: September 15, 2009, 05:29:08 AM »

Sure you're right! So we're all going with a paternity test and a maternity test are only one test now?

That is correct. There were two tests for two different labs, and each test took samples from all three individuals. There were no separate paternity and maternity tests.

Problem is, as you well know but wish to ignore in this discussion, that there is no proof presently that the child tested was the child that was supposed to be tested. And that is the question that is still not resolved.

I'm going with the DNA test was accurate and Mrs Shelton is the Mother.So if the wrong child was tested how many other children does Mrs Shelton have? Are they close in age? Which of her children do you think it was?

According to how I read the report Nosir Myzing posted from who knows where, she has a 19,999/20,000 chance of being the mother. That means she has a 1/20,000 of not being the mother.

I have no way presently to prove how many children she has. And I don't know the odds of a niece having the same test results.

Yet you spout your opinions anyway.. FYI She has 2 children the oldest is 16, and there is no way she would be mistaken for a 6 yr old by Dr Day, or take the place of the 8 yr old child who was tested. To the best of my knowledge there are no nieces, and she would not pass as their mother even if there were although you will no doubt keep trying to pretend that is a possibility.

I guess you also don't care or think it relevant that Dr Day payed for only a paternity test, and then after her and your silly excuses and arguments on the internet about not knowing who the child was, the Sheltons called and in order to clear up any confusion caused by your continuing libel requested that a Maternity test be done on the same samples so that the question could be resolved and put to rest for all the rational people? That of course explains the difference in dates on the mailed out lab results - at least it does for us.

And Pickle, EVERY U.S. court of law accepts 99.99% as proof of Paternity or Maternity. The one-one hundredth of a percent is a standard allowed for error. You are grasping at illogical and unreasonable straws to maintain your "wrong" stance, which is not unusual and imo is why you have lost most of your supporters and defenders even in your own little group.

Your double standards are revealed yet again by the fact that you posted:
Quote
Actually, according to what the surmising Nosir Myzing posted, the one lab said that paternity was 99.99% certain, which would make Danny the father of the child. A likely typo.

So if it had been about Danny he would have been the father, but since it was about Brandy, you say there is not proof she is the mother?

That is ABSURD and IDIOTIC, and yes that is my opinion and I am entitled to it whether it is edited or not.

I am done here with this topic, the fat lady sang long ago, you Fran, Tinka and Jodi and your little sock puppets can continue arguing and protesting and pretending your opinions and judgments are reality without me.

I'm sorry to have bothered your little world here with documents and facts, and that's the only apology you will get from me, but hey why don't you shout my entire name out one more time just for kicks as there might be at least one person out there who hasn't heard you and doesn't know it by now. ;)


toodles...
« Last Edit: September 15, 2009, 05:46:05 AM by Ian »
Logged

Pat Williams

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 300
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #76 on: September 15, 2009, 06:53:06 AM »

Nowhere do I find, in the test results, that it proved that Brandy was the mother. 


Jodi,

You can not be blamed for not seeing what 3abn's accusers have never posted or published or spoken of on their own, but now that you have had time to see what the posted Maternity Test results say have you adjusted your thinking here?

Since the results were mailed to Dr Day also why do you think Dr Day has never included the maternity test results on her website along with the 2 paternity test results proving that Danny was not the father?

It appears deceptive to me or at the very least as if only part of the story is being told and other things hidden. I do not think this helps reveal the truth of a situation myself. I am curious about how you feel about this kind of thing when it comes to your attention?

- 3D
Logged

Pat Williams

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 300
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #77 on: September 15, 2009, 07:13:44 AM »

Most of us have already seen the results. What made this discussion interesting was why were they acting so strangely. I can understand getting the test results right to the post office but I think the test results were in question even before they were taken because even though the tests were home kits, identification was incomplete (no fingerprints) and documents were incomplete and xeroxed...

Child...

For what it is worth to you. I am acquainted with the Sheltons and the younger daughter who was tested. I have no doubts that the pictures of them which Dr Day has posted are the very same three being talked about here. Many have seen the family and I am not aware of one person who knows, has met, or has ever seen Brandy's daughter whether on tv or in person saying that is not her on Dr Day's website. Are you? In addition Brandy has video of the entire thing and it is positively her daughter being tested and despite what Tinka and Jody and others have claimed here erroneously (whether from being deceived themselves or because they are being deceiving themselves I don't know)  she was not under a blanket when she was tested.

I maintain a hope that there are some people here who care about truth as much as they profess to so I have four questions for you. 1.) Do you realize that there is no identification required with a home kit, and that Dr Day is an interested party and no lab will accept those things from her? 2.) How would taking fingerprints help Dr Day? What I mean is how could she use them to identify any of the three tested? 3.) As Dr Day had the copy of the child's passport with it's photo and she looked right at the child when she took the sample, how likely do you think it is that she would take that sample if she had any doubts that the child she was getting ready to swab was not the one in the xeroxed passport photo or did not at least look just like her? 4.) If the child Dr Day both saw and swabbed did not look like the one in the photo don't you think she would have said so?



3D
« Last Edit: September 15, 2009, 07:22:21 AM by 3ABN_Defender »
Logged

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #78 on: September 15, 2009, 03:22:10 PM »

Yet you spout your opinions anyway..

Have you posted an apology for your last false accusation, Cynthia?

FYI She has 2 children ....

That's probable. But you can't prove that, can you?

To the best of my knowledge there are no nieces, and she would not pass as their mother even if there were although you will no doubt keep trying to pretend that is a possibility.

To your knowledge, there was only one lab involved when there were in fact two. So your knowledge has been impeached.

I do not know the odds of a lady testing out to be the probable mother when she is in fact but an aunt. What would be more productive than your mere assertion is if you provided a concrete number as to those odds.

I guess you also don't care or think it relevant that Dr Day payed for only a paternity test, and then after her and your silly excuses and arguments on the internet about not knowing who the child was, the Sheltons called and in order to clear up any confusion caused by your continuing libel requested that a Maternity test be done on the same samples so that the question could be resolved and put to rest for all the rational people?

Your explanation is totally absurd. Why not simply acknowledge your mistake?

Look at the two reports. What evidence do you see that a second test was run on the same samples? There is none!

Your double standards are revealed yet again by the fact that you posted:
Quote
Actually, according to what the surmising Nosir Myzing posted, the one lab said that paternity was 99.99% certain, which would make Danny the father of the child. A likely typo.

So if it had been about Danny he would have been the father, but since it was about Brandy, you say there is not proof she is the mother?

Excellent point. So to clear up the inconsistency, based on the likely typo, there is a 19,999 out of 20,000 chance that Danny is the father.

Cindy, where did you get that report from?
Logged

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #79 on: September 15, 2009, 03:30:28 PM »

Since the results were mailed to Dr Day also why do you think Dr Day has never included the maternity test results on her website along with the 2 paternity test results proving that Danny was not the father?

Danny_Defender, you sound like you are prevaricating. Look the two reports over and see what test results are on the second report that aren't on the first report. The only difference is commentary.
Logged

childoftheking

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 358
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #80 on: September 16, 2009, 03:41:01 AM »

Most of us have already seen the results. What made this discussion interesting was why were they acting so strangely. I can understand getting the test results right to the post office but I think the test results were in question even before they were taken because even though the tests were home kits, identification was incomplete (no fingerprints) and documents were incomplete and xeroxed...

Child...

For what it is worth to you. I am acquainted with the Sheltons and the younger daughter who was tested. I have no doubts that the pictures of them which Dr Day has posted are the very same three being talked about here. Many have seen the family and I am not aware of one person who knows, has met, or has ever seen Brandy's daughter whether on tv or in person saying that is not her on Dr Day's website. Are you? In addition Brandy has video of the entire thing and it is positively her daughter being tested and despite what Tinka and Jody and others have claimed here erroneously (whether from being deceived themselves or because they are being deceiving themselves I don't know)  she was not under a blanket when she was tested.

I maintain a hope that there are some people here who care about truth as much as they profess to so I have four questions for you. 1.) Do you realize that there is no identification required with a home kit, and that Dr Day is an interested party and no lab will accept those things from her? 2.) How would taking fingerprints help Dr Day? What I mean is how could she use them to identify any of the three tested? 3.) As Dr Day had the copy of the child's passport with it's photo and she looked right at the child when she took the sample, how likely do you think it is that she would take that sample if she had any doubts that the child she was getting ready to swab was not the one in the xeroxed passport photo or did not at least look just like her? 4.) If the child Dr Day both saw and swabbed did not look like the one in the photo don't you think she would have said so?



3D

I certainly never said that the child was under the blanket while her mouth was being swabbed. She was hidden under the blanket in the vehicle before the test. If the child was as claimed there is no sane logical explanation I can think of for such bizarre behavior. So has the stress of his situation pushed him over the edge or has he always been a loose cannon prone to strange unpredictable odd conduct?

And why follow part of the test protocol but not all? Do rules chafe him? Must he prove that rules are for other people and he doesn‘t have to comply completely? If he has nothing to hide then strict adherence to documentation would have helped him immensely. If as you say there is no logical explanation, what is the illogical explanation? I just can’t figure such actions out.
Logged

Daryl Fawcett

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2933
  • Daryl & Beth
    • Maritime SDA OnLine
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #81 on: September 16, 2009, 12:12:30 PM »

Getting back on topic, what's the latest on Brandy leaving Danny?

Is this actually true?

I asked them over at the other what some refer to here as the smut site (not my choice of words), but met with surprising opposition by simply asking them whether this was true or not, therefore, by their very biased remarks, it obviously must be true, otherwise, they would have given me a resounding NO!!!!

princessdi

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1271
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #82 on: September 16, 2009, 12:18:45 PM »

Ok, I sam with Rex...you can't even begin to make this stuff up.  Bob you have got to be kidding.  Can she prove that Brandy on has 2 children? I am not sure, with the imaginations that exist here, why you all are not into sci-fi........things that make you go...hmmmmm......LOL!!!  

Yet you spout your opinions anyway..

Have you posted an apology for your last false accusation, Cynthia?

FYI She has 2 children ....

That's probable. But you can't prove that, can you?

To the best of my knowledge there are no nieces, and she would not pass as their mother even if there were although you will no doubt keep trying to pretend that is a possibility.

To your knowledge, there was only one lab involved when there were in fact two. So your knowledge has been impeached.

I do not know the odds of a lady testing out to be the probable mother when she is in fact but an aunt. What would be more productive than your mere assertion is if you provided a concrete number as to those odds.

I guess you also don't care or think it relevant that Dr Day payed for only a paternity test, and then after her and your silly excuses and arguments on the internet about not knowing who the child was, the Sheltons called and in order to clear up any confusion caused by your continuing libel requested that a Maternity test be done on the same samples so that the question could be resolved and put to rest for all the rational people?

Your explanation is totally absurd. Why not simply acknowledge your mistake?

Look at the two reports. What evidence do you see that a second test was run on the same samples? There is none!

Your double standards are revealed yet again by the fact that you posted:
Quote
Actually, according to what the surmising Nosir Myzing posted, the one lab said that paternity was 99.99% certain, which would make Danny the father of the child. A likely typo.

So if it had been about Danny he would have been the father, but since it was about Brandy, you say there is not proof she is the mother?

Excellent point. So to clear up the inconsistency, based on the likely typo, there is a 19,999 out of 20,000 chance that Danny is the father.

Cindy, where did you get that report from?
Logged
It is the duty of every cultured man or woman to read sympathetically the scriptures of the world.  If we are to respect others' religions as we would have them respect our own, a friendly study of the world's religions is a sacred duty. - Mohandas K. Gandhi

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #83 on: September 17, 2009, 12:58:56 PM »

Getting back on topic, what's the latest on Brandy leaving Danny?

Is this actually true?

Sources say that it is. Including a high-ranking 3ABNer.
Logged

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #84 on: September 17, 2009, 01:01:40 PM »

Ok, I sam with Rex...you can't even begin to make this stuff up.  Bob you have got to be kidding.  Can she prove that Brandy on has 2 children? I am not sure, with the imaginations that exist here, why you all are not into sci-fi........things that make you go...hmmmmm......LOL!!!

If this were a matter to be tried in court, then the question of proving that she has only had two children would probably come up.
Logged

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #85 on: September 17, 2009, 02:25:00 PM »

Does this indicate Danny Shelton could be dealing with the results of two divorces/separations at the same time? At least the case with Linda has not been settled yet.

Getting back on topic, what's the latest on Brandy leaving Danny?

Is this actually true?

I asked them over at the other what some refer to here as the smut site (not my choice of words), but met with surprising opposition by simply asking them whether this was true or not, therefore, by their very biased remarks, it obviously must be true, otherwise, they would have given me a resounding NO!!!!
Logged

Jodi

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #86 on: September 17, 2009, 09:49:15 PM »

I was called last week, asking me if I had heard that Brandy's divorce from Danny was already final.  The party that called me had heard it was...I don't know.  Has anyone heard any more on that subject recently? 
Logged

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #87 on: September 18, 2009, 05:41:43 AM »

I was called last week, asking me if I had heard that Brandy's divorce from Danny was already final.  The party that called me had heard it was...I don't know.  Has anyone heard any more on that subject recently? 

I heard that it was about final, but I can't verify that anything has yet been filed in Florida or even Guam. If they did file, where did they file?
Logged

Daryl Fawcett

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2933
  • Daryl & Beth
    • Maritime SDA OnLine
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #88 on: September 19, 2009, 11:42:41 AM »

With another divorce on the way to happening, when are the powers that be, if they really exist, going to wake up and realize that they have a liability that needs to be unloaded, rather than kept to their own hurt?

princessdi

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 1271
Re: Brandy has left Danny
« Reply #89 on: September 21, 2009, 08:38:47 PM »

Well, we know Danny lies them quickie Guam divorces...I dont' doubt it....but was he able to unload her for 250K, or did infliation get him?  LOL!! Ok Sorry could not resist...forgive......hehehehe!

I was called last week, asking me if I had heard that Brandy's divorce from Danny was already final.  The party that called me had heard it was...I don't know.  Has anyone heard any more on that subject recently? 
Logged
It is the duty of every cultured man or woman to read sympathetically the scriptures of the world.  If we are to respect others' religions as we would have them respect our own, a friendly study of the world's religions is a sacred duty. - Mohandas K. Gandhi
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 11   Go Up