Shouldn't this be an easy thing to verify one way or the other?
I should say this is interesting information. Thank you for posting it. I have a notion it will be studied by legal counsel and compared with other information concerning what happened.
I have spoken with a Gospel Outreach Board member and what Johann said is not correct information.
1) Linda Shelton did NOT help collect any funds for Gospel Outreach. You are mixed up. She helped with Blue Mountain TV (Hope) to collect funds for them at a later date. She did not collect any funds for Gospel Outreach. These are two different entities.
2) 3ABN did not "close down" the work of Gospel Outreach. The GO Board member spoke with Jim Gilley who told them they had "poor quality programming" and that they needed to upgrade. Gospel Outreach is in the process of meeting these standards set by 3ABN. This was between Jim Gilley and GO Board, Danny didn't even know about it. The GO Board member who spoke to me said their programming did need to improve and that this was a goal of theirs so they could be back on 3ABN soon.
Yes, it would be easy to verify Mr Fawcett. Unfortunately it seems most of the crew here prefer to believe what their friends here tell them, or what they say something means or indicates, and can't let the facts or other contrary evidence get in the way of that.
For example Johann claimed Gospel Outreach has been victimized and persecuted by 3ABN.
Yet no one here seems to think that what the two parties;Gospel Outreach and 3ABN, and specifically both of their presidents has to say is important, or cares to ask either of them about it. Gospel Outreach does not in fact echo Johann's claim.
Nor did any of the crew here even bothers to ask Johann (living in a completely different country and not related to either party ) to explain where he got his information from, or even bothers to ask him for anything to support or prove his reported as "fact" claim, for that matter.
Instead they tried to discredit and attack the one person who did bother to talk to the President of Gospel Outreach and post what they were told by both parties and where their information came from. (easily verified)
There are too many koolaid drinkers here in my opinion who just regurgitate and attack any dissenting voice as lying or protecting or defending sin, as if all that they have read here or had reported to them by 3ABN's accusers is the gospel truth.
Willful ignorance, and a refusal to verify or prove things, does not justify repeating false accusations, nor their attacks of those who do try and do so.
Johann wrote:
"It certainly would be nice if it's that easy. Lawyers and quasi-lawyers seem to thrive on re-interpreting verifications. Some do all kinds of tricks to hide facts and make it appear like the opposite happened."
Johann,
All lawyers know that here say such as you posted here is not evidence. I am quite sure Linda's lawyers, if they thought it at all relevant, would go to the two parties involved and get their first person accounts, and quickly discover that they were in agreement and that their account doesn't match your account.(Linda's).