And here we have another attempt by Robert Pickle to change the subject, and cover over and bury issues under current discussion (in the semi-private forum) between anyman and himself. Because that discussion demonstrate that Robert and 3abns accusers are wrong. Robert does so by dragging up and repeating other false allegations, and by making demands of anyman when he knows full well that he is banned and cannot answer. Convenient...
Just to deal with your question, no, the individual you insinuate did not provide any information - he has far more moral fortitude than do you.
I found the above a bit bizarre. I understood anyman to be referring to 3ABN Board chairman Walt Thompson, and I find anyman's statement to be just plain weird.
Walt Thompson has been one of the major players in the whole 3ABN scandalous scandal. He was grossly negligent in 2003 when investigating the child molestation allegations against Tommy Shelton, taking Danny's word for everything and never contacting any of Tommy's alleged victims to get their side of the story.
Robert Pickle leaves out the part where the member of the Church of God who was present and involved in the TS situation was contacted and Duane Clem agreed with what that individual told Dr Thompson. He also left out the part also where Dr Thompson found that the Police Department and the Local DA were aware of the allegations and said there was nothing to proceed with. He leaves out the part also where the entire 3abn board which included Linda Shelton at the time voted in consensus after weighing the facts and actual evidence known at the time.
This is all apparently convenient to Robert's "truth" and story.
And anyman says the man has moral fortitude?!?!
Then we have Walt not taking charge and getting rid of Danny after the Remnant debacle, whereby Danny laundered perhaps between $749,000 and $809,000 of 3ABN money through Remnant into his own pockets between 2005 and 2007.
The bold test statement by Robert above is a lie. Even the amounts credited to DS are wrong. This is also defamation per se as Robert is falsely accusing another of a crime.
And Robert's new spin and angle is to accuse Dr Thompson of failing to get rid of DS, but DR T is under no obligation to follow Robert's demands. Dr Thompson has knowledge of, and is in possession of all the relevant facts and so is very aware that Robert's claims are false.
There is nothing illegal in authors of a books receiving royalties. Nor was the fact that royalties were paid ever an issue or denied by DS. It is not laundering. It is not kickbacks. It is not an excess benefit. It is not and it will never become those things no matter how many times Robert tries to call them that whether in titles of court documents he tried but was denied permission to file, or here in his public posts.
The lawsuit complaint filed against Mr Pickle and Mr Joy concerned their claims that all of this was improperly reported both to the IRS and in divorce proceedings. Never , not once have either Mr Pickle or Mr Joy proved that this was the case, or even attempted to prove that. The evidence is all to the contrary. The iRS did not find this to be the case, nor did auditors.
The Remnant documents are perfectly legal and above board and are evidence of no wrong doing by anyone. All of this has been declared in court and Robert knows it, and has never proved any different.
Robert will no doubt continue to twist and spin in the wind about this and repeat his claims like a broken record, but it establishes nothing as he has proved nothing. It is just hot air, and very stale at that, as are his demands that others explain as if they have some obligation to prove something false which has never been established as factual or true.
Those who delight in believing evi of others will suck it all up, but they are a very small minority here, thank God.
anyman, I think you have some explaining to do.
Author
Topic: anyman says Walt Thompson has moral fortitude? (Read 7335 times)
