Advent Talk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

If you feel a post was made in violation in one or more of the Forum Rules of Advent Talk, then please click on the link provided and give a reason for reporting the post.  The Admin Team will then review the reported post and the reason given, and will respond accordingly.

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Defendant's Motion to Impose Costs is DENIED  (Read 13917 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
Re: Defendant's Motion to Impose Costs is DENIED
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2009, 06:08:07 AM »

So could I be sued for defamation per se if I accused a lawyer of being honest?

If you are right that all lawyers lie, then according to Rev. 21:8, 27 and 22:15, no lawyer will go to heaven.

I think lawyers need to think about that. If they lie and refuse to repent for doing so, they will end up in the lake of fire and roast awhile, according to Rev. 21:8.

Rev. 21:8 says, "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death." It doesn't say most liars or some liars. It says all liars.

Maybe Danny and Shelley can add a chapter to their 10 Commandment book on this and then promote it being sent to lawyers. I would be tempted to financially support such a project ... if Danny stops trying to hide his assets and income from his divorce-related proceedings, and apologizes for lying on his July 2006 financial affidavit.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2009, 06:14:35 AM by Bob Pickle »
Logged

tinka

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Defendant's Motion to Impose Costs is DENIED
« Reply #16 on: April 15, 2009, 08:52:25 AM »

Bob,
You know Jesus warned the Lawyers and Preachers the most. It will be like the rich man going through the eye of a needle. They better get all they can while on this earth as "That is all they will get". It is true that God loves the sinner but lets them have all on this earth they can get. They will not have any of the next!! I sort of apply that scenario to the ones that claim they are a 100 years old and smoked and had drank all their life.  I know that God still loved them and let them have on this earth all..with seemingly no problems  HE knows they did not chose him in all things. There is no way out of this unless complete repentance and compensation. That is when it becomes too big and over the line just like the story of the rich man. He preferred his riches.  There may be very low bank accounts, but you know, just another episode, ploy, or cover up. Too much has happened to believe any different.

 Look on our web site where we prove the lies of the attorney and name him and his firm and the lies over and over again. We put the documents up and not a thing they can do about it.  It shows the tricks and lies from the biggest law firm supposedly in the world. It took a big one to take us down.  We do not flinch with the truth on our side. It has spread to 20 countries and almost all states of the US. and on the stats we see them on it. It gives a just a little satisfaction to see law firms, judges, law Universities and and justice organizations, news media in London and etc. etc. etc.  looking hour after hour of the documents and individuals in organizations looking at the corruption. Every where they turn a link is brought to our web site. 

Corrupt Adventist from the beginning as partners, us hiding the embarrassment for us and the church, instead of standing up against the corruption we paid the price trying to salvage what they did to us. Who knows you may know who they are and likewise have a whole lying story to protect what they did. Those documents we have never shown against them, hoping God would bless for covering. It did not work that way. They totaled our life from the beginning, our children left the church as they witnessed all. We did what we could to recover and then our web starts from there. Would the church help us now??no We even had letter from GC to sue them. We even contacted Adventist Attorney, hoping he would be honest to no avail. We should have. Would any Adventist help us..no!! we had every reason not ever to set foot back into that church except for one thing. The truth is there but have witnessed much corruption. That is why I have believed EGW as she has known that all truth was given to a special people and much would fall. No not even our fate has made us unbelieve truth that has been shed on us. Too bad that we are filtrated so heavy and of course what else would you expect the Devil to do to Adventism. So here we are until the wheat and tares will soon be separated. IF we would not been involved with Adventist this would never have happened to us. We turned down another very respectable partner after contracts were ready to sign when we ran into a situation that was supposed to help the church and school and in 12 hours  went with deceived corruption. SDA and do not tell me there is not more out there just like it. In fact I am sure Satan has his disciples there the most. Why not. This is where truth is!!! I probably have said too much but although we cannot do anything for justice either at least a voice is heard and hopefully some in the valley of hiding, or covering can just look at the word "extravaganza" and how it applies.


Logged

Sam

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 218
Re: Defendant's Motion to Impose Costs is DENIED
« Reply #17 on: April 15, 2009, 11:23:06 AM »

So could I be sued for defamation per se if I accused a lawyer of being honest?

If you are right that all lawyers lie, then according to Rev. 21:8, 27 and 22:15, no lawyer will go to heaven.

I think lawyers need to think about that. If they lie and refuse to repent for doing so, they will end up in the lake of fire and roast awhile, according to Rev. 21:8.

Rev. 21:8 says, "all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death." It doesn't say most liars or some liars. It says all liars.

Maybe Danny and Shelley can add a chapter to their 10 Commandment book on this and then promote it being sent to lawyers. I would be tempted to financially support such a project ... if Danny stops trying to hide his assets and income from his divorce-related proceedings, and apologizes for lying on his July 2006 financial affidavit.
quote



Financially support?  Bob according to everything we have seen with pacer documents and so on, you have nothing financial to support with.  Or, wait, are you hiding your assets Bob? Have you not been honest with the court?   On that subject what did happen to the funds from the "support Pickle/Joy fund"?  Several times you said you would make all the records public so people could see where every donated penny went but so far I haven't seen any of those records.  Also in reading your submitted expenses on the court docs, you didn't show where any Pickle/Joy funding monies had been applied to anything.  Were you trying to "double bill" through the courts?  In other words using your funding money to pay a particular court cost but then submitting that cost in your failed attempt to extort money from 3abn? 


edited for formatting, content not altered.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2009, 12:11:31 PM by Emma »
Logged

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
Re: Defendant's Motion to Impose Costs is DENIED
« Reply #18 on: April 15, 2009, 03:01:27 PM »

Sam,

Tone it down, and maybe I will reply. For Jesus did say not to cast your pearls before swine.

"failed attempt to extort money from 3abn"? That's highly offensive, uncalled for, and a lie.

So tone it down, be civil, and then we can talk.
Logged

ex3abnemployee

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 751
Re: Defendant's Motion to Impose Costs is DENIED
« Reply #19 on: April 15, 2009, 07:23:35 PM »

Sam,

Tone it down, and maybe I will reply. For Jesus did say not to cast your pearls before swine.

"failed attempt to extort money from 3abn"? That's highly offensive, uncalled for, and a lie.

So tone it down, be civil, and then we can talk.
Sam tone it down and be civil? Thanks for the chuckle.
Logged
Duane Clem
It's not about religion, It's about a relationship

Snoopy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3056
Re: Defendant's Motion to Impose Costs is DENIED
« Reply #20 on: April 15, 2009, 08:05:49 PM »

Sam,

Tone it down, and maybe I will reply. For Jesus did say not to cast your pearls before swine.

"failed attempt to extort money from 3abn"? That's highly offensive, uncalled for, and a lie.

So tone it down, be civil, and then we can talk.


ADMIN HAT ON

I agree.  Sam, you need to watch yourself.

ADMIN HAT OFF
Logged

Gailon Arthur Joy

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1539
Re: Defendant's Motion to Impose Costs is DENIED
« Reply #21 on: April 15, 2009, 08:46:28 PM »

Well, I wonder, has there ever been an individual who changed their mind? How about over the course of six day?

Possible scenario: On the day that the phone call Robert keeps alluding to occured, there was no plan to file a voluntary motion to dismiss. However, as a result of the failure to respond by Gailon Joy and Robert Pickle, the plaintiffs and their attorney changed strategy and six days later filed the motion to voluntarily dismiss. Thus,  Robert's continued insinuations and claims that Atty. Simpson lied to him are foundationless liable.

- anyman


Anyman, old boy, or is it old girl today???

Let me refresh your memory and point out that the Motion to dismiss followed the very clear decision in Southern Illinois that was sure to lead to the production of the auditors records...what a coincidence, aye???

Rest assured we will be back, dismissal will not be an option and we will once again be looking for those auditors records.

Shiver me timbers, anyman, did I feel you quake just a bit...better tell dear old Dad he has reason to fear the second coming!!!! The claim is fully ripe now, old boy. Two more events and "I'LL BE BACK!!!".

Only reformation will avert a most certain second adversarial confrontation...and be sure to mention they will need NEW COUNSEL!!!
How about doubling the number this time??? Could be sold as 3ABN's own version of the Lawyers Full Employment Stimulous Program. Really build those "legal fund" donations...oh, yeah, I forgot, you lost a key donor!!!

Should be easy to "lawyer up" given the lay-offs in the legal community.

And by the way, notice that they only approached Bob regarding settlement conversations...must be they knew I have a "NO NEGOTIATION" rule!!!


Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter
Logged

Pat Williams

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 300
Re: Defendant's Motion to Impose Costs is DENIED
« Reply #22 on: April 18, 2009, 01:27:00 PM »

Well, I wonder, has there ever been an individual who changed their mind? How about over the course of six day?

Possible scenario: On the day that the phone call Robert keeps alluding to occured, there was no plan to file a voluntary motion to dismiss. However, as a result of the failure to respond by Gailon Joy and Robert Pickle, the plaintiffs and their attorney changed strategy and six days later filed the motion to voluntarily dismiss. Thus,  Robert's continued insinuations and claims that Atty. Simpson lied to him are foundationless liable.

- anyman


Anyman, old boy, or is it old girl today???

:huh: Why does that even matter?


Let me refresh your memory and point out that the Motion to dismiss followed the very clear decision in Southern Illinois that was sure to lead to the production of the auditors records...what a coincidence, aye???


 :dunno: Weren't those records already produced and examined in the IRS Investigation?  :scratch:

Rest assured we will be back, dismissal will not be an option

Alright. Since you are so gung ho, and sue happy, and even appealing the dismissal of the lawsuit, it seems that your various followers and adherents should most likely stop protesting about how ungodly and unchristian it is to take your brethren to court and stop posting about how frivolous or stupid the lawsuit is then...


and we will once again be looking for those auditors records.

Ok, and since the accountants, auditors, and IRS et al had access to all and found nothing? You with only unsupported hearsay and without that information are expecting to find what exactly? And How is it that you consider yourself more qualified then they to do so with far less knowledge or information?


Shiver me timbers, anyman, did I feel you quake just a bit...better tell dear old Dad he has reason to fear the second coming!!!! The claim is fully ripe now, old boy. Two more events and "I'LL BE BACK!!!".

ok.. Yo ho ho, to you also. Please tell me you aren't trying to instill fear in others or intimidate them, and that you are not at the same time trying to compare yourself to Christ and your intended actions to His second coming???  :hot:


Only reformation will avert a most certain second adversarial confrontation...and be sure to mention they will need NEW COUNSEL!!!
How about doubling the number this time??? Could be sold as 3ABN's own version of the Lawyers Full Employment Stimulous Program. Really build those "legal fund" donations...oh, yeah, I forgot, you lost a key donor!!!

Should be easy to "lawyer up" given the lay-offs in the legal community.

And by the way, notice that they only approached Bob regarding settlement conversations...must be they knew I have a "NO NEGOTIATION" rule!!!


Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter


It occurs to me a chest may be swelling with pride here and that usually goeth before a fall but we will see.

                                                                                                         Fixed quotations
« Last Edit: April 18, 2009, 01:35:05 PM by 3ABN_Defender »
Logged

Gailon Arthur Joy

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1539
Re: Defendant's Motion to Impose Costs is DENIED
« Reply #23 on: April 18, 2009, 06:43:01 PM »

Defender,

Is that Defender General, not so general or just plain ignorant....If we believed any of your assertions and if your team was so certain there was nothing more to discover, they would not have dismissed and would not have opposed every discovery motion made!!! In fact, we would be happily on our way to trial and your team would have had some cofidence they really would be exonerated....BUT....THEY KNEW THEY WERE LOOSING AND RAN!!!! I KNEW THEY WERE LOOSING AND WOULD RUN.

Unfortunately for them, I knew they would be fool enough to file suit and they did. Now they must suffer the full consequences....DANNY LEE SHELTON cannot RUN from justice!!! Here or at the second coming.  He is an embarrassment to ADVENTISM and clearly impenitent, despite the fact he has been caught with his hands in the cookie jar. THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES, something he has successfully averted in the past, but justice will be served in time.

Running did not resolve anything, but rather has left an air of contention that is unresolvable except by a court of COMPETENT jurisdiction and a jury of MY PEERS....that is where it will end. LET THE EVIDENCE BE SEEN!!!! Including the IRS DEAL.

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter
Logged

Snoopy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3056
Re: Defendant's Motion to Impose Costs is DENIED
« Reply #24 on: April 18, 2009, 07:53:21 PM »


Defender General.....or.....Defender Ford.....?????
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up