Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Bob Pickle]

Correct. I did assume.

Now want to try answering my questions?

[anyman]

Well, it wouldn't be a "try," as my answers would be factual and based on the truth and not your speculative efforts. However, I don't think I will indulge you until you are willing to answer the 75+ questions that have been put to you over the course of time on various discussion boards.

You usually just ignore them and attempt to quickly send the discussion in a direction that suits you. Now, if you are ready to cease evading the significant and relevant questions put to you, we might begin an open exchange. But as long as you continue to make demands of unilateral response I imagine you won't find many willing to engage in an exchange with you.

There is a parochial arrogance about your demands and "requests" that leads many to weigh your assertions in the balance and find them sorely lacking veracity.

anyman

Correct. I did assume.

Now want to try answering my questions?

[Wendall]

Sounds as if a mediator maybe a good idea.  One person gets to ask questions and the other answers and then vice versus. A problem though is anyman is not a party (I am making that assumption) and to make the field even Bob's opponet should be a party to the suit.  :hamster:I think this might be called a deposition of a party. Then the questions and answers can become sworn testimony and then the truth can possibly be ascertained by others. 

[Bob Pickle]

anyman,

If you don't want to discuss the very points you raise, then don't bring them up. Don't start accusing me of being angry, and don't treat Simpson's statements as fact if you don't want to discuss your objective basis for doing so.

If you have a question to ask me that directly addresses a point I raised that you think I have ignored, then feel free to ask it again.