Advent Talk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

If you feel a post was made in violation in one or more of the Forum Rules of Advent Talk, then please click on the link provided and give a reason for reporting the post.  The Admin Team will then review the reported post and the reason given, and will respond accordingly.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: Appellant brief filed  (Read 27610 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
Re: Appellant brief filed
« Reply #45 on: March 31, 2009, 03:59:48 PM »
Correct. I did assume.

Now want to try answering my questions?
Logged

anyman

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 316
Re: Appellant brief filed
« Reply #46 on: March 31, 2009, 06:39:35 PM »
Well, it wouldn't be a "try," as my answers would be factual and based on the truth and not your speculative efforts. However, I don't think I will indulge you until you are willing to answer the 75+ questions that have been put to you over the course of time on various discussion boards.

You usually just ignore them and attempt to quickly send the discussion in a direction that suits you. Now, if you are ready to cease evading the significant and relevant questions put to you, we might begin an open exchange. But as long as you continue to make demands of unilateral response I imagine you won't find many willing to engage in an exchange with you.

There is a parochial arrogance about your demands and "requests" that leads many to weigh your assertions in the balance and find them sorely lacking veracity.

anyman

Quote from: Bob Pickle on March 31, 2009, 03:59:48 PM
Correct. I did assume.

Now want to try answering my questions?
Logged

Wendall

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 67
Re: Appellant brief filed
« Reply #47 on: March 31, 2009, 07:21:02 PM »
Sounds as if a mediator maybe a good idea.  :pals: One person gets to ask questions and the other answers and then vice versus. A problem though is anyman is not a party (I am making that assumption) and to make the field even Bob's opponet should be a party to the suit.  :hamster:I think this might be called a deposition of a party. Then the questions and answers can become sworn testimony and then the truth can possibly be ascertained by others.  ;D :cool: ;D :wave: :beagle: :usa: :pals:
Logged

Bob Pickle

  • Defendants
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4061
    • Pickle Publishing
Re: Appellant brief filed
« Reply #48 on: March 31, 2009, 08:15:58 PM »
anyman,

If you don't want to discuss the very points you raise, then don't bring them up. Don't start accusing me of being angry, and don't treat Simpson's statements as fact if you don't want to discuss your objective basis for doing so.

If you have a question to ask me that directly addresses a point I raised that you think I have ignored, then feel free to ask it again.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »