Here's questions I posted on the Weimar Yahoo Group site:
________________________________
Re: More Weimar/Afacts Details
Quite helpful, but it raises again a question I've had:
> Rumor- "The Church has now taken over Weimar."
> The facts. Weimar will remain a separate entity operating under
> it's original 501(c) (3) non profit corporation. The members of the
> Amazing Facts board will be added to five members of the existing
> Weimar board. ... Amazing Facts is organizationally connected
> with The Northern California Conference but is led by it's own
> independent constituency and board.
So does that mean that Amazing Facts will no longer be
organizationally connected to the Northern Calif. Conf.? And no longer
have the large, independent constituency it now has?
The proposed merger with 3ABN would have taken Amazing Facts out of
the denomination. The new organization was to have a new constituency,
which sounded good, since the 3ABN Board needs to be accountable to
someone. But then Danny Shelton said on ClubAdventist that they had
asked the ASI Missions, Inc. board to serve as the new constituency,
which meant that the merger would cause Amazing Facts to lose its
large constituency, and the board of the huge and powerful combined
ministry would answer to a rather small group of people.
For what it's worth, the constituency of ASI Missions, Inc. (of which
Harold Lance is the president), is the nine or so member ASI Executive
Committee. Not a lot of accountability for an organization that has so
much power through whom it funds and doesn't fund.
Now if the merger of AF with Weimar would mean that AF would leave the
denomination and lose its large constituency, like what the merger
with 3ABN would have done, I wonder if Harold Lance (since he
presumably was involved with both AF merger attempts) could comment
for us and tell us if this is just a coincidence or if it is part of
some sort of plan behind the scenes.
If the Weimar/AF merger would mean that AF would leave the
denomination and lose its constituency, how does the present AF
constituency feel about that?
Another question that still remains, even after the explanation below,
is whether the potential reimbursing of on-paper expenditures would be
offset or reduced by income, and whether the on-paper expenditures
would only include actual expenses paid out.
Bob