A lot of that lawsuit confuses me, I thought it was about copy-write infringement. Not sure how everything else got involved.
They alleged within the complaint that we had posted a copyrighted video on Save3ABN.com, but didn't include copyright infringement as a count against us. IN other words, while they accused us of copyright infringement, they didn't sue us over that.
And it was all a lie anyway that we had infringed copyright, since they had advertised and argued in court that none of their programming was copyrighted.
It would be wrong for the board to release those photos to the public.
It would be wrong for the board to not release them to the public, after suing us over the matter.
They sued us over whether Linda had committed adultery. Since they did that, they were required to release those photos, if they really exist. Those photos would then have become public record, since they would have been used either against or for us, depending on whether they really were evidence or not.
One court case called conduct like what 3ABN and Danny did, in suing us and then refusing to participate in discovery, "undue vexatiousness." It's wrong. If they weren't going to produce those documents, they never should have sued us.
But this is nothing new. They sued over their property tax exemption denial, and then never produced their 990's when requested. Then they tried to slip them in later because they could help prove a point, but Administrative Law Judge Barbara Rowe wouldn't let them do that since they had not produced them to the other side when requested.
I do not think it is any secret that they did hire a PI to follow her and take those. I believe the PI is a matter of public info and has been discussed openly on some forums. Other wise I would not know about it.
3 PI's in 3 separate cars, is what Danny claimed were hired, in his ugly, unchristian little email.