Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Fran]

CPAATTY;

If you will play nice, maybe I will post proof that I will be notified one way or the other.  Then again maybe I won't!

[Fran]

Talking about investigations, Danny really needs to help these dudes.  They need to learn how to legally provide zero documents.  Danny needs to tell them to shred, shred, shred, deny, deny. deny, object to every subpoenas and never get it to court!

These guys need help fast!

  http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090217/bs_nm/us_stanford_9

Stanford, aides failed to appear for testimony: U.S.
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Texas billionaire Allen Stanford and top aides at his investment group failed to respond to recent subpoenas seeking their testimony on what federal investigators now call a "massive" fraud, court papers said on Tuesday.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said it had issued subpoenas to Stanford, aide James Davis and O.Y. Goswick, a board member of Stanford International Bank. "None of these witnesses appeared for testimony or produced a single document," the SEC said.

(Reporting by Randall Mikkelsen, editing by Jackie Frank) 

One the news tonight, it showed police and all kinds of investigators at their offices in Dallas.  Nobody could tell anyone where these folks were.  Mum was the word.  Boxes ans boxes were taken out of the offices.  The offices were being run by attorneys.  Interesting for sure.

Maybe Danny should talk to them and learn what they are doing.  Maybe Danny should have run back in 2004!

Will Danny finally have to flee when he finds that he can no longer deny, shred, and delay.  Every time a transaction takes place, it takes place somewhere else.  All you have to do is find the other party to find all those shredded documents.  Poof, they appear like magic!

[Bob Pickle]

There are legal implications to attorneys being involved in destroying evidence, like Duffy admitted to being. Wouldn't all those documents they ordered the IRS to destroy qualify as evidence?

[YODA]

There are legal implications to attorneys being involved in destroying evidence, like Duffy admitted to being. Wouldn't all those documents they ordered the IRS to destroy qualify as evidence?

Stupid lawsuit over, mmmmm? Longing for martyrdom still you are?


"Much to learn, you still have."

When destroying copies obtained in a legal action that dismissed was.
The destruction of original evidence, it is not.

When answering an IRS inquiry you are. Giving them orders and making demands of them you are not.


Accusing licensed attorneys and officers of the court of a serious offense you are. Prove it you can not.

Libel and Defamation per se, it is.  Sanctions there be.


Fortunate you are that limited funds you have.


Understand this, I fear you will not.


YODA



"War does not make one great."

[Bob Pickle]

Yoda, if you want talk in normal English, it would be easier to follow your thoughts.

Duffy and Danny said that the IRS was told to destroy all those documents by the end of July 2008. The motion to dismiss the lawsuit wasn't filed till Oct. 23. Thus, the lawsuit wasn't dismissed yet when the IRS was allegedly told to destroy documents.

Secondly, those documents are the only solid evidence that I know of about what 3ABN and Danny gave the IRS. Destroy all of that and it becomes difficult to prove whether 3ABN and Danny were forthcoming or not. And that is a crucial component to proving the bogus vindication fable.

3ABN and Danny claim to have been vindicated by the IRS. Were they? Did 3ABN and Danny fess up and give them everything, even the incriminating stuff, or did they play games like they did with us?

The problem is that statutorily government officials are forbidden to disclose tax stuff, and thus the IRS is probably muzzled from disclosing their side of the story unless 3ABN and Danny signs a release. We asked the court to order them to sign such a release, but ... guess what? They dropped the lawsuit!

[Fran]

FYI;

I received a communication today letting me know that the claim is still OPEN!  It ain't over yet!

[ex3abnemployee]

FYI;

I received a communication today letting me know that the claim is still OPEN!  It ain't over yet!

You...you mean...we were fed : GASP : false information? 

Say it ain't so! This is SUCH a surprise.

[Snoopy]

FYI;

I received a communication today letting me know that the claim is still OPEN!  It ain't over yet!

Hhmm.  You mean...Walt and Danny and Company...they...LIED?  No way.  Hard to believe.

I'll bet the judge would be interested in that...

[Sam]

FYI;

I received a communication today letting me know that the claim is still OPEN!  It ain't over yet!

See how you all fell for that without asking the key questions?

1. Communication from whom?
2. Can you prove it?

[Snoopy]

FYI;

I received a communication today letting me know that the claim is still OPEN!  It ain't over yet!

See how you all fell for that without asking the key questions?

1. Communication from whom?
2. Can you prove it?

I didn't "fall" for anything.  I trust Fran.

[Fran]

FYI;

I received a communication today letting me know that the claim is still OPEN!  It ain't over yet!

See how you all fell for that without asking the key questions?

1. Communication from whom?
2. Can you prove it?

Yes, I can, but not for you. 

[Sam]

FYI;

I received a communication today letting me know that the claim is still OPEN!  It ain't over yet!

See how you all fell for that without asking the key questions?

1. Communication from whom?
2. Can you prove it?

Yes, I can, but not for you. 

Ok, I'll be more than fair and leave out the "proving" part for now.  You can surely tell us where the "communication" came from.  Whether it came directly from the IRS, Gailon Joy/Bob Pickle, or Joe Blow makes a huge difference doesn't it?

[ex3abnemployee]

Ok, I'll be more than fair and leave out the "proving" part for now.  You can surely tell us where the "communication" came from.  Whether it came directly from the IRS, Gailon Joy/Bob Pickle, or Joe Blow makes a huge difference doesn't it?

What's the matter, Sam? Are we a little nervous about what Fran might have? Must be horrible, wanting the information and not being able to get it.

[Mary Sue Smith]

Ok, I'll be more than fair and leave out the "proving" part for now.  You can surely tell us where the "communication" came from.  Whether it came directly from the IRS, Gailon Joy/Bob Pickle, or Joe Blow makes a huge difference doesn't it?

What's the matter, Sam? Are we a little nervous about what Fran might have? Must be horrible, wanting the information and not being able to get it.

Excuse me? The IRS investigation is OVER and COMPLETED at 3ABN. What Fran is speaking about is something obviously different. No one has lied and no, Sam is NOT worried.  Go make fun of someone your own size.

[Fran]

FYI;

I received a communication today letting me know that the claim is still OPEN!  It ain't over yet!

See how you all fell for that without asking the key questions?

1. Communication from whom?
2. Can you prove it?

Yes, I can, but not for you. 

OK, I'll be more than fair and leave out the "proving" part for now.  You can surely tell us where the "communication" came from.  Whether it came directly from the IRS, Gailon Joy/Bob Pickle, or Joe Blow makes a huge difference doesn't it?

It came straight from the IRS.  Speaking of Bob and Gailon.  I sent them the evidence, but I am sure they will not share with you either.