Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[tinka]

Fran,

What?? Doug is blind to all transpired?? Where has he been???

I understand he's been in and out according to the posts at 3abn
.
Did he see nothing wrong?

Does he feel all is correct in the divorce?

Why does he now think it is safe to send to 3abn now??

You got to be kidding!!

another guiding light just went out.  All seemed perfect except for one thing.

Maybe it is the vegan diet where all essentials until the demand for it has proven lack of proper nourishment to the brain.

I was shocked at not having TV for some time and then seeing him almost emancipated. I am for healthy vibrant look. I can see when vibrant is gone.

Or again did the money win out???

I am sick he wrote this!!

The close affiliates justify TS, divorce, extravaganza living etc.  If TS was not guilty -none of this blankety, blankety talk of ###sex would even be discussed on here. They so use the system of law to defend the same as Satan tried to use the Word of God (system) against Jesus.

Did he not see this?

Is there anything left of organized church?

Who can stand this corruption?

Yes, I know--the corrupted!

Is there still Mark, Ken, or Lyle ?

I really do not look for a leader but truth in a persons character.

Trust no man it says.

But why can't we have a true friend?

 

[tinka]

Fran and Everybody,

I must make an apology, When I first read this note from Doug, it appeared that you Fran put that on in answer to Johann. Of course it was 2:30 am. Now as I go back and see Grats post. It now appears that 3-d put that on but it seemed to be at that time presented by Fran.

sorry Fran. But just in case it don't hurt to be a little inquisitive about why Doug would even write that back then or not consider the TS situation in front of all creation. I still do not agree with these top evangelist inter mingling. Especially when it is a non denominational beg-a-thon.

[Fran]

Thanks, Tinka;

I have been having a mean 4 rounds with the flu/s! 

I didn't get around to reading all I have missed and only just now read your posts!  Things like that when the time factor is involved! 

Do you have a Google toolbar across the menu Part of Explorer.  If you Don't have it, It is free from Google.com.  Go Here. 

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4WZPA_enUS322US322&q=google.comgoogle+toolbar

If you do have it, it has an icon that says has a small "ABC" above a Check Mark; beside that, it says "CHECK".  It will spell check any thing you type on the internet.  I use it for my spell checker.  It is fast and super easy, 

I love you.  May God continue to bless you.

[Fran]

FYI Update.

It isn't closed.  Maybe 2010 will be the golden, "It is finished" year.  Maybe God's "It is finished", will come long before the IRS says "It is finished".  It has been 5 years.

[Artiste]

Has it really been five years?

[Fran]

I sent the IRS my information on January 5, 2005.  So, on January 5, 2010, it will be 5 years!  And the beat goes on!

[anyman]

I sent the IRS my information on January 5, 2005.  So, on January 5, 2010, it will be 5 years!  And the beat goes on!

So your proof is that you haven't received a check yet . . . so sad you don't understand the procedures and the reality that you are never going to be contacted.

[Bob Pickle]

And so sad that you don't understand the procedures and the reality that they are never going to contact you to tell you that!

Thus, you have no evidence to support your statement.

[anyman]

And so sad that you don't understand the procedures and the reality that they are never going to contact you to tell you that!

Thus, you have no evidence to support your statement.

Even RJP agrees, Fran, your phone isn't going to ring, your mailbox will be empty, and you will grow more bitter as the months of silence pass.

[Artiste]

Is that what you meant, Bob?

[Bob Pickle]

No, that wasn't what I meant, and I would think anyman knew that.

I was referring to the fact that the IRS isn't going to contact anyman to tell him that no one is going to contact Fran, and it is quite apparent to me that anyman doesn't understand the procedures the IRS uses.

Moreover, anyman can't present any evidence that shows that the IRS exonerated Danny and/or 3ABN.