Advent Talk

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to Advent Talk, a place for members and friends of the Seventh-day Adventist Church! 

Feel free to invite your friends to come here.

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow  (Read 12545 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Fran

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 572
Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« on: November 13, 2008, 08:56:10 PM »

This document must be posted in several posts, it is so long.  The exhibits are to follow.  I am sorry to not be able to get it all in on post. (Unformated text file)

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
)


Three Angels Broadcasting Network, Inc., )
an Illinois non-profit corporation, and )
Danny Lee Shelton, individually, ) Case No.: 07-40098-FDS
)
Plaintiffs, )
v. )
)
Gailon Arthur Joy and Robert Pickle, )
)
Defendants. )
)

AFFIDAVIT OF ROBERT PICKLE


NOW COMES Robert Pickle of Halstad Township, Norman County, Minnesota, who
deposes and testifies to the following under pain and penalty of perjury:

1. Between February and June 2004, the marriage of Danny Lee Shelton (hereafter
“Shelton”) and Linda Shelton disintegrated, and Linda Shelton found herself terminated from
employment at Three Angels Broadcasting network, Inc. (hereafter “3ABN”).
2. On April 16, 2004, Linda Shelton replied to an email from Johann and Irmgard
Thorvaldsson. That reply contained Linda Shelton’s account of the saga to that point in time, and
included her account of a planned trip to Florida over spring break with Brenda Walsh (hereafter
“Walsh”) at a time when Dr. Arild Abrahamsen (hereafter “Abrahamsen”) would be there, a trip
which she claims was later canceled. That reply is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Linda Shelton’s
reply also asserts that the saga began in September 2003, after which Abrahamsen decided to
visit 3ABN, and that during that visit she met Abrahamsen.
1



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 6

3. On April 21, 2004, Shelton emailed Abrahamsen claiming that he could monitor
every phone call Abrahamsen made or received. Shelton also claimed that he could monitor
every number Linda Shelton called, and how long each conversation lasted. Besides claiming
that Dr. Arild Abrahamsen had determined that Shelton was psychotic, and that Linda Shelton
had talked negative about Shelton, Shelton also made multiple references to planned vacations in
Florida and elsewhere, and cited Walsh as a key witness to what was transpiring between Linda
Shelton and Abrahamsen. This email is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
4. On March 4, 2004, Walsh wrote Dee Hilderbrand, a 3ABN employee, informing
Ms. Hilderbrand that Walsh had made reservations with Delta Airlines for tickets to Florida, that
the confirmation number was RV163S, and that the tickets needed to be purchased within 24
hours. Walsh’s email is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
5. On March 5, 2008, tickets pertaining to confirmation number RV163S for Walsh
(ticket # 00621930502970, SkyMiles # 2207208956) and Linda Shelton (ticket #
00621930502981, SkyMiles # 2075843512) were purchased with an American Express credit
card ending in 3209. These tickets are for flights from St. Louis, Missouri to Tampa, Florida via
Atlanta, Georgia, on April 4, 2004, and returning on April 9, 2004. The receipts were printed out
on March 8, 2004, from a computer account attributed to Mollie Steenson, according to the URL
printed at the bottom of each receipt. These receipts are attached hereto as Exhibits D–E.
6. Inasmuch as Walsh told Dee Hilderbrand that the tickets needed to be purchased
within 24 hours, that the same credit card was used for both tickets, and that the receipts were
printed out from Mollie Steenson’s computer account, the conclusion can be drawn that 3ABN
paid for these tickets.
7. On October 27, 2004, Shelton wrote Gregory Matthews and asserted that he had
foiled a planned trip to Florida, but that Abrahamsen had traveled to the United States at least
2



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 3 of 6

three times the summer and fall of 2004 to vacation with Linda Shelton. This email is attached
hereto as Exhibit F.

8. An inquirer called Walsh around the spring of 2008 to ask her about Linda
Shelton. The inquirer sent a recorded copy of that telephone conversation to the Defendants. In

that conversation Walsh stated:

I said ..., “I’m not going, I said, if if Danny, if ... doesn’t approve of
this.” ... “I’m not doing this.” But I refused to go. And she did buy
my ticket, and I refused to go. And I still have a copy of my ticket
because it’s still unused. But her ticket is used.

9. On September 24, 2004, Linda Shelton wrote Shelton, theorizing that Shelton had
jumped to conclusions and overreacted, and now could not swallow his pride and admit that he
was wrong. Shelton’s reply gave a list of Linda Shelton’s failures, which included the planned
trip to Florida over spring break with Walsh. This exchange is attached hereto as Exhibit G.
Shelton specifically accused Linda Shelton of “Buying tickets behind my back and planning on
going on vacation to Florida with him behind my back.” Thus, according to Shelton, 3ABN must
have lacked adequate internal controls to avoid purchasing airline tickets for personal vacations.
10. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a notarized statement by Mrs. Ida Smith attesting
to a March 8, 2006, phone conversation that she had with Walsh in which Walsh claimed that
Linda Shelton had gone to Florida after all to stay at Abrahamsen’s house with Abrahamsen, and
in which Walsh claimed that private investigators had conducted surveillance of Linda Shelton,
even recording her conversations.
11. About March 19, 2004, Shelton wrote an email to Abrahamsen, referring to a
planned meeting in Florida in April between Abrahamsen and Linda Shelton that apparently was
not going to take place after all. That email is attached hereto as Exhibit I.
12. On September 15, 2004, Shelton wrote an inquirer and asserted that Linda Shelton
and Abrahamsen had taken vacations together while Shelton was still married to Linda Shelton,
3



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 4 of 6

and that “This is what ultimately caused the divorce.” This email is attached hereto as Exhibit J.

13. On July 7, 2004, Shelton wrote Linda Shelton and referred to allegedly
contemplated vacations in Florida, Las Vegas, New York, and Norway, as well as an alleged four-
day vacation with Abrahamsen that Linda Shelton had just returned from. This email is attached
hereto as Exhibit K.
14. About September 1, 2004, Shelton wrote Linda Shelton, again referring to the
planned vacation to Florida to stay at Abrahamsen’s condominium. Shelton also refers to
multiple trips by Abrahamsen to the United States to be with Linda Shelton after Shelton’s June
25, 2004, divorce from Linda Shelton. This email is attached hereto as Exhibit L.
15. On May 16, 2004, Shelton and Linda Shelton exchanged emails in which Shelton
refers to alleged “planned vacations” between Abrahamsen and Linda Shelton “in several
different locations” while Shelton and Linda Shelton were still married. At one point Linda
Shelton contends that Sheltons’ account is 75% error. This email exchange is attached hereto as
Exhibit M. In this exchange Shelton also refers to the finding of a pregnancy test kit on May 7,
2004, as confirmation that Linda Shelton had committed adultery.
16. Regarding the the finding of the pregnancy test kit, Shelton’s vasectomy, and the
implications, Walsh claimed in the telephone conversation referred to above at ¶ 8:

And he looked through the packages and there was a pregnancy
test in there. And so he confronted her with it. ... “I was just doing
it for a joke. I was just playing a joke ....” And he said, “Linda,
when you’re in a serious situation like we are, you don’t play a
joke like this. Are you thinking you’re pregnant ...?” She wouldn’t
tell him. Well, Danny called me then after that just almost in tears,
and and told me about it. And I said, I said, “Well Danny,” I said,
“you know, maybe this, maybe this is a a good thing, you know.”
And he’s like, “No, Brenda. What do you mean it’s a good thing?”
And so, “Well, have you considered a moment that it could be your
baby?” He said, “No.” He said, “I had a vasectomy eight years
ago.” See, I’d never known that. I wouldn’t have never had any way
of knowing that. That’s not something you tell, and Linda never
shared that with me. And I said, “Danny, you couldn’t have had a

4


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 5 of 6

vasectomy eight years ago, because two years ago Linda thought
she was pregnant with your baby.”

17. On May 6, 2004, Linda Shelton wrote to Abrahamsen from her daughter’s email
account warning him about possible rumors arising from her pregnancy test kit joke that she was
going to play on Shelton the very next day. This email is attached hereto as Exhibit N.
18. Attached hereto as Exhibit O is the investigative report found on
Save-3ABN.com which covers the finding of the pregnancy test kit on May 7, 2004. This report
highlights the critical importance of determining if and when Linda Shelton met Abrahamsen in
Florida or anywhere else between February 6 and May 7, 2004. Without a meeting of the two
between those dates, the pregnancy test kit, if not a poor choice of a joke as Linda Shelton
claimed, was evidence that either Linda Shelton thought she might be 15 weeks pregnant but
couldn’t tell for sure, or that she had gotten pregnant by talking too long on the telephone.
19. Attached hereto as Exhibit P is an email exchange with 3ABN Board chairman
Walt Thompson in which Walt Thompson claims that the pregnancy test was found in mid-May,
that a trip to Florida by Linda Shelton to meet with Abrahamsen did take place five or six weeks
earlier in April, that he has no physical proof that such a trip really took place, that he has “made
no effort to determine exact dates,” and that he is “reporting only what I believe I was told.”
20. The Seventh-day Adventist Church believes that Matthew 5:32 and 19:9 should be
followed today among its membership, and that these verses teach that the only biblical grounds
for divorce among believers is fornication.
21. On April 7, 2004, Shelton wrote Abrahamsen and stated that Linda Shelton had
admitted certain things to him just the day before regarding the planned trip to Florida. This
email is attached hereto as Exhibit Q. Linda Shelton being around to allegedly admit to Shelton
certain things on April 6, 2004 affirms the claims of Exhibits A (p. 3), F (p. 2), and K that the trip
of April 4 to April 9, 2004, never took place.
5


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 6 of 6

22. On April 14, 2004, Shelton wrote Abrahamsen, accusing him of committing
“spiritual adultery,” a term foreign to the theology of Seventh-day Adventists. That email is
attached hereto as Exhibit R. Shelton included a link to a web page describing “spiritual
adultery” (http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/8207.htm), which defined the term by a quotation from a
book entitled Why Some Christians Commit Adultery. That web page is attached hereto as
Exhibit S. The quotation on the web page defined spiritual adultery as occurring when “married
persons share with someone else what ought to have been shared first or only with their own
spouses.”
23. On April 23, 2004, an email was sent from Shelton’s email account, purportedly
from Linda Shelton, and forwarded to Abrahamsen the next day. The email is attached hereto as
Exhibit T. The email purports to be a confession by Linda Shelton after Shelton had brought
home the book, Why Christians Commit Adultery, on April 23, a confession that admits to
“spiritual adultery” but denies that physical adultery had occurred. Since this email originated
from Shelton’s email account, it is likely that its contents were either written, dictated, or
approved by Shelton himself.
FURTHER DEPONENT TESTIFIES NOT.

Signed and sealed this 2nd day of September, 2008.

/s/ Bob Pickle
Bob Pickle
Halstad, MN 56548
Tel: (218) 456-2568

Subscribed and sworn to me
this 2nd day of September, 2008.

 /s/ Perry W. Kolnes
Notary Public—Minnesota

My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2010
Logged

Fran

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 572
Re: First of exhibits in the order of the original document
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2008, 09:02:07 PM »


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-2 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 5 1 of 5

Ex. A


-----Original Message----From:
Linda Shelton
Sent: 16. april 2004 16:18
To: Johann Thorvaldsson
Subject:
Re: Greetings


Hi Johann & Irmgard,

This is the partial story of the events I told you I was going to record. I think it helps clear up alot of
problems.

We went to the marriage counselor yesterday. Although nothing much has changed, it was a good day.
Dan is no longer saying I have to say the doctor was of the devil. One thing the counselor did say to Dan
which was a bit comical was, "I get so tired of hearing you talk...please listen." He also said, "50% of
everything that comes out of your mouth is a put-down to your wife." But, like I said, I think the Lord
blessed inspite of the fact that nothing much changed, except two more people know what's going on in
our lives.

Irmgard, my prayers are with you. Keep looking to Jesus. He is giving you the strength for this battle.
Your peace of mind and your positive outlook is critical at this time. I wish I could be there to try to
make you laugh. I've got some great stories after yesterday! God bless you!!

Love you,

Linda Shelton

.
.
This story begins last September when Dan & I went to Denmark. There we met Irmgard, Johann’s

.
.
wife, for the first time. (Johann is a retired Pastor who is promoting 3ABN in Europe.) (Delightful
people.) Just one week after this trip I received an e-mail from Johann stating that Irmgard had been
diagnosed with bone cancer. I contacted them several times making them aware of individuals which
could help them here in America. They decided to come to 3ABN for some treatments by some local
people. Meanwhile they met a doctor from Norway over the phone who invited them to come to
Norway. Irmgard said she needed to go to 3ABN first...and then this particular doctor felt impressed to
go to 3ABN as well. He had been watching 3ABN for about 4 years. I met Dr. Abrahamsen through
Johann & Irmgard about the last week of December, towards the end of his visit. Then I mentioned to

him about the condition of my son, Nathan.

Nathan was just 15 when his father (who is not a Christian) took me to court to get custody of Nathan.
Although the father had spent little time with Nathan during his childhood, Nathan was thrilled when all of
a sudden he received special attention from him and the encouragement to move in with him. He
promised lots of fishing and hunting time together. Making a long story short, I lost custody of Nathan.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-2 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 5 2 of 5

.
.


Less than a year later Nathan wanted to come home to live with us, but his father would not let him, and
the law did not support him doing this. After this, Nathan’s life became a terrible and horrifying journey
as he chose a wild lifestyle with alcohol, drugs, etc. Nathan is alive today because of the grace of God,
and a lot of prayer. Nathan worked in the coal mines from ages 21-23. (He’s 23 now) Thus, he was able
to afford the most addicting drug on the market today which is known as "meth." In one year’s time, he
says, he spent $20,000 on this drug. As a result Nathan looked like one of the starved Jews out of a Nazi
camp with scars from the affects of the drugs all over his face and neck. Additionally, Nathan had been
exposed to dangerous chemicals in the mines and he was a physical wreck. As his mother, I have been
begging God for a miracle for many years.

It was a miracle when I was able to convince Nathan to go and see Dr. Abrahamsen while he was here.
He tested Nathan and, of course, discovered that he was in a terrible physical condition. He said, "I think
I can help you but you would need to come to Norway." Somewhere in the conversation he offered
Nathan a place to stay and also treatments which would help him physically...and Nathan actually agreed
to go. It was scheduled for Nathan and his girlfriend, Dava, to go about January 21. I talked to this doctor
only a couple of times making the arrangements for this trip. Dan’s opinion was that the doctor sounded
like a "quack" but he thought just a month away from his friends would help.

Next, my best friend (of two years), Brenda and I flew to Norway to give Nathan support. We arrived
on Monday night February 2 and we left Friday morning, February 6. I was amazed at the difference in
Nathan’s appearance in only 10 days. He was gaining weight, his scars were healing and his attitude was
100% improved. I praised God that finally my miracle had come for my son. Afterwards, when home
again, I called to check on Nathan about twice a week. One conversation with the doctor alerted me to
the fact that he felt that Nathan’s foundational problem was that he really wanted a Dad. His blood
father had kicked him out of the house when he was 18. At that time I asked my husband if he could
move in with us to nurture him back to the Lord. Dan refused. He said, "Nathan is just too different now
with his drinking and smoking and drugs. And what if he brought his friends over to the house?" I felt
really bad about the doctor’s conclusion and I went to Dan in January and said, "We really failed Nathan
when we didn’t invite him to live with us when he was 18. He really needed us." Dan in general
responded, "That was your marriage, it’s your kid and it’s not my responsibility...and don’t think for a
minute he’s going to move in with us when he get’s home from Norway." Again I was reminded I had to
fight for Nathan’s life alone.

Brenda and I had a pleasant visit with the doctor while we stayed in his home. He had lost his wife just
last August, and when he got home from work, in the evenings we were able to make him laugh and get
his mind off of his sorrows. He invited Brenda to come back in June for treatments, since she was in a
bad physical condition...he even offered to pay for her plane ticket. When Brenda and I left Norway, we
both felt we had gained a friend.

February was a heavy month of traveling for Dan & myself. The first week I was in Norway. The
second weekend we were in Florida. The third week we went to the Philippines. And the fourth
weekend we were in Kansas. But between February 8, when I got home from Norway, and March 9,
when we counseled with our Pastor, I am accused of committing spiritual adultery...to the extent that my
husband has told me six times that he now has grounds to re-marry. Additionally, the doctor was in
Africa one of those weeks, so that leaves approximately 2 weeks where this adultery had to have
happened. Dan obtained the records from a calling card that I had which revealed that there were calls
on 3 days out of 10, and these longer calls began to occur when Nathan came home ( the latter part of
February) and started have drug problems again, and also I started having serious problems with Dan.


.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-2 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 3 of 5 3 of 5

Although I never discussed Dan with the doctor early on, when the serious problems began, the doctor
was a friend that I felt would keep things confidential...and he was 6000 miles away.

When I arrived home from Norway I told Dan that I’d found a friend in this doctor and that Nathan was
doing excellent. Twice, when I was talking to the doctor on the phone, Dan came and pulled the phone
away from my ear so he could listen. (Let me point out here that I’ve never done this to Dan when he
was talking to a female.) When the subject changed from "Nathan" to something else Dan said "Hang
up." I explained to Dan that when he is raising funds for 3ABN that he never just said "Hello, would you
send 3ABN $10,000?" He always had a warm, friendly conversation and he made friends with the
person. In the same way, I felt I couldn’t just formally discuss Nathan and then "hang up." So from then
on, my conversations with the doctor were done privately.

At some point in February I was sharing with the doctor about how busy we were at 3ABN with
traveling and schedules and he said, "You know, I’m going to Florida over spring break, and you ought to
think about going down there to get some rest." I just changed the subject because I thought it would
never fit into my schedule anyway. A few days later I mentioned to Brenda what the doctor had said.
Her response was "Oh, I think that would be fun, let’s go!" A week later when the doctor returned from
Africa, I mentioned to him that Brenda and I thought we’d go to Florida. He had totally forgotten
anything about it. But he agreed to go and he offered to provide his condominium as a place for us to
stay. Brenda and I innocently thought this was no different than scheduling a trip with "Uncle Bob." We
thought, "What’s the difference between staying at the doctor’s house in Norway, or staying at his
condominium in Florida. YES, hindsight is much better than foresight. This was an enormous mistake,
especially considering our positions at the ministry. But our hearts were pure and nothing diabolical was
planned. Additionally, at the time of scheduling our tickets, Dan was not in a good mood, so I did not
mention to him that the doctor would be in Florida at the same time. However about two weeks later
after Brenda talked with Dan, she came to me and said "Dan is getting pretty irate about you talking to
the doctor. We better cancel him." I immediately agreed. However, he offered the condo for us to stay in
although he wouldn’t be there. But we had remedied this Florida vacation situation way before Dan
found out about it. And as it turned out, the entire trip was canceled.

Somewhere during the month of February I asked Brenda if she really wanted to go to Norway in June
to get treatments. She said "Yes." I said, "Well, if you want me to go, you’ll have to ask Dan if I can go."
She did. He said "yes." Please keep this in mind for later.

March 8 Dan told me if I didn’t stop talking to the doctor, he was going to get me fired at 3ABN. This
was quite a bombshell, and at the time I felt that he was trying to make me choose between him and my
son, because Nathan still needed this doctor who cared about him and who had so incredibly helped him
physically. (In 3 and ½ weeks his appearance was completely different, and he looked similar to how he
looked at 18.) Things really began to get crazy at this point. Dan said he was going to talk to our Pastor,
who by the way works for Dan, and who Dan is trying to raise money for his down payment on a house.
He did. The next day I called John, not intending to get into any heavy discussions, but it ended up that he
came over to our house for six hours. Dan discussed our "surprisingly horrible" marriage to John for
about 5 ½ hours, while I mentioned a few issues in 30 minutes. Dan’s threat was "It’s either the marriage
and 3ABN or it’s the relationship with the doctor." The conclusion of the evening’s meeting was that I
wouldn’t talk to the doctor anymore.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-2 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 4 of 5 4 of 5

----- Original Message -----
From: Johann Thorvaldsson
To:
Linda Shelton
Sent:
Wednesday, April 14, 2004 4:10 PM
Subject:
RE: Greetings

Linda, so good to hear from you again. Irmgard and I both prayed for you this evening. She says she is
willing to die if that would help the healing of 3ABN -and your marriage.

She has to lie still on her back all night - and a nurse us watching over her and a couple of other patients.
We don't know if this has anything to do with her cancer, but it is extremely painful. She has no pain in
her old cancer spots right now. The treatments he go during Easter have helped her.

Remember that you and 3ABN will grow much stronger after an ordeal like this.

Blessings,

Johann - and Irmgard

-----Original Message----From:
Linda Shelton
Sent: 14. april 2004 21:55
To:
Johann Thorvaldsson
Subject: Re: Greetings

Hi Johann,

I said a prayer for you and Irmgard. I know this has to be alot of stress on you both right now. In fact,
as I heard Dan speaking to you today I thought, this is terrible. You already have so much you are
dealing with to hear about more problems. I am so sorry.

Johann...and I think you already know this, I will not call my husband a "liar" because I hate that word.
But please take his words with a grain of salt. His words come across completely out of context and he
takes fragments of sentences here, and pieces there to form his "case." And quite frankly, what he has
done to isolate Brenda from me, now I think he is trying to do with you and Irmgard. Please pray for me
right now. I am really "trying" to love my husband right now, but his words and actions keep getting in
the way! (Hope this doesn't sound too bad...but it's the truth.) But I'm hanging on to Jesus and 3ABN
with every fragment of strength that I have. May God help us!! God bless you!!

LS

----- Original Message -----
From:
Johann Thorvaldsson
To:
Linda Shelton
Sent:
Saturday, April 10, 2004 2:09 PM
Subject: Greetings


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-2 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 5 of 5 5 of 5

-----Original Message----From:
Linda Shelton
Sent: 8. april 2004 23:15
To:
Johann Thorvaldsson
Subject:
Re: Hospital


Hi Johann & Irmgard,


Your prayers are my life support system right now. I will only answer your calls when I am able. God
bless you!!
[Johann and Irmgard Thorvaldsson] It is amazing how we have become to mean so much to each
others.


Love you,


Linda
[Johann and Irmgard Thorvaldsson] Danny, You are presenting Linda as the "angel" and the devoted
wife she has always been.


So, I'm the bad fellow. At church this morning the pastor's wife gave me a big hug - and so did her
husband. Right in front of Irmgard she reminded me of the great love relationship there had been
between her mother and me many years ago, which her mother had told her all about. Yes, I loved
Mrs.Hansen, and neither Irmgard nor Mr. Anton Hansen seemed to mind. Our common interest was
music, singing, and evangelism. We could spend hours talking together about those things. We had no
idea that we were not permitted to talk more than firve or 10 minutes, so we never timed our
conversations. If we had know better we'd alway seen to it that someone else was there with us when
we talked together. None of us ever thought it would hurt our spouses. We both knew that our spouses
trusted us.


Mrs, Hansen died several years ago. I might be more careful today, especially since I have learned that
there are husbands around that are certain the devil is at work after 5 or 10 minutes. Love must be
bound by fetters that limit your own behavior - and the word of God - but the moment you tie your spouse
with those same fetters, love goes out and a demon destroys your marriage.



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-3 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 of 2
Logged

Fran

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 572
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2008, 09:17:55 PM »


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-3 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 of 2

Ex. B


From:
"Danny Shelton"
Date:
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:21:02 -0500
To:
aaedta@...


Doctor,
Johann says that if you believe my wife needs support because of lies being told or whatever, you will
come across the ocean and save her. I would be most happy for you to come and have a meeting with
my board and conference President and explain to them how you could


1. Invite a married woman to go with you on a vacation with you and live in your condo together. My
wife has told me that you personally invited her and no one else. I've talked to a number of counselors,
and so has she now, who all agree that there is no good reason a man would invite a married woman to
stay with him alone in his condo behind her husbands back. They all agree that the devil used you to do
this because you obviously desire her.
2. I'd like to hear you explain how I told you never to call my wife again or have any contact again, and
yet you still continue to even to this day. My wife has admitted talking to you even after you and she both
promised me you would stop. She admitted Saturday evening that she has had to lie to cover up your
conversations. She has told me how you think I'm out to lunch and that I'm physcotic and all of these
things.
3. I'd like to hear you explain what gives you a right to "husband" another man's wife, even after you
promised Pastor John you would never be in contact with her again.
4. I would like to hear you explain why you keep trying to husband her after you told Brenda Walsch you
believed that my wife was in LOVE WITH YOU. She says she will come to such a meeting and expose
all of your plans for not only a vacation in Florida behind my back, but also invited my wife on a vacation
to Scandinavia, which my wife also admits. Your problem is, my wife admits all of these things that I'm
accusing you of, she just thinks that they can be justified away. Not so, by any normal thinking person.
You have indeed fooled her of your intentions, but you have fooled no one else involved.
5. I want to hear you justify the dozens of hours you have talked to her on the phone, some conversations
of up to 4 hours and 9 minutes, according to the phone records. Please convince us they were about
Nathan. The problem is, my wife admitted to the neutral marriage counselors, that she chose, that you
and she talked negative about me on a number of occasions, and that you have convinced her I'm out to
lunch.
her negative counselors told her to drop all relationship with you because you could bring no good into her
life, only destruction.
6. You must think I'm stupid, I have a record of every phone call between you and she up to this day.
Even though she started using phone cards, which you probably suggested, I still can monitor every
number and for how long the conversation is. I also can monitor every phone call that has come in to you
and all those going out. She knows this now I just told her yesterday. I was waiting to give you doctor, as
they say in America, "enough rope to hang yourself". and you've done just that.
7. Yes, I not only look forward to meeting you hear in America with our board chairman and our attorney
and conference President who is also on our board, but I intend to meet with or without you in Norway,
with your conference officials also.
8. You should have stopped all of this a long time ago. Of course you still maintain you have done nothing
wrong. My wife says you tell her that your just trying to help her and the ministry! Well, we'll see, what
these other folk think about all of your "help".
9. She also told me about your going to a OCI meeting at the national ASI meeting and said that you
apparantly wanted to meet her there and asked me whether I wanted her to go or stay home. I told her

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-3 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 2 2 of 2

that would be a great place to expose you to our board and church leaders.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-4 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1

Ex. C


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-5 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1

Ex. D


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-6 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1

Ex. E


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-7 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 of 2

Ex. F


-----Original Message----From:
Danny Shelton
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 7:35 AM
To: temple.matthews@...
Subject: FW:

Gregory, My IIlinois Conf. Pres, and 3ABN board member Ken Denzlow, ( he is currently serving on our
board) said you are a pastor and appeared to be a reasonable guy. I told him someone had sent me a copy
of what goes on in this chatroom and it is shocking that people will spend what appears to be hours talking
about things they know almost nothing about and representing themselves as knowledgeable. I didn't have
your email so Ken gave it to me.

I sent a message to an Ed White, simply because his address was available on the info someone sent me.
I don't know him. I sent him the following note. These were some of the subjects that I had seen that
people were discussing in this chat room, yet nearly all just seemed to be speculation. I've always believed
in being a straight forward person. If I don't know an answer I go to the source if possible. My email has
been advertised on 3ABN so it is no secret.

When I read the kind of stuff that's being said about me and 3ABN based on the rumor mill I don't
recognize my self or any of our 3ABN board members or programmers. There is nothing synacle going on
at 3ABN. We are all terribly saddened by the absence of Linda. Linda has made her own decisions that
has placed her outside of 3ABN. NO ONE wanted her out of this ministry. Most of all me. She was my wife
of nearly 20 years and I still love her dearly. At least once a week I email her and ask her to drop this
relationship with this Dr. telling her that I will forgive her and let's start the process of reconciliation.

I'm just surprised that people believe a board of Christian leaders, church and laity, would be doing all
these terrible things to Linda, knowing that the decisions we are making will be scrutinized by the world.

Early on, there were several reasons why our board chose not to be so forthcoming in our description of
why Linda was no longer at 3ABN. Even though her refusal to listen to all counseling concerning an
inappropriate relationship with another man had been refused by her many times, we still felt that somehow
this situation could be resolved. We did not want to publicly humiliate her to the point that it would drive her
away from the ministry, we still had hope of her coming back. yet we had to tell people that she was no
longer with us and just hope that people would trust this Christian group of men and women who have been
leading this board for many years. Most people did as evidence by the overwhelming support as shown by
letters and an upswing in finances. People were telling us that they saw this as an attack against the
ministry that God has raised up to herald the 3 Angels messages to a lost an dying world.

For nearly 20 years I have always encouraged people to support the message of 3ABN. I have told them
that God uses us in spite of us, not because of us. I have always encouraged people not to look to Linda
and me or any other people they see on 3 ABN, as people will fail you.

Secondly, early on Linda hired a lawyer from Benton Illinois, to my knowledge or hers this man is not a
Christian. She has always considered him a "Junkyard Dog" attorney. This same lawyer, hired by her 1st
exhusband many years ago, took her to court and turned her every way but loose on her divorce from her
first husband. She did manage to get the kids but her 1st ex husband got them most weekends, which
kept them out of church. Linda tried to explain the Sabbath to the court, but this same lawyer that she has
hired to represent her against me and 3ABN, made the keeping of the 7th day Sabbath look foolish to the
judge. I'm sure many of you have read her email where she talks about the political influence of her now 1st
ex husband’s inlaws.

This former foe of Linda's who now represents her, wanted her to sue 3ABN for a least a million dollars
according to her own account. They told us if anything was said about Linda and this relationship with
another man that they would take us to court and sue us for all they could get.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-7 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 2 2 of 2

.
.


Our own SDA attorney help draft the first letter that Walt Thompson our board chairman sent out to our
mailing list.

Now several months later we can be more descriptive according to our 3ABN attorney as Linda and this Dr
have made public their relationship by spending many many weeks together this summer and fall. She has
taken to trips to Norway to vacation with him to different places in Europe. He has been to the States to
spend vacations with her here at least 3 times this summer and fall also. They can no longer accuse us of
talking about something without proof. These trips to Europe were taken by herself. Her son did not go with
her.

Greg, If you read Linda's web page about being tucked away in Southern Illinois for the last few weeks you
will find that she was gone most of the time with this man either in Europe, or Central Illinois or Las Vegas,
a place where I heard the two of them plan a vacation together back in early May while we were very much
married. I don't know if he met her in Vegas this time, but I did hear their plans to go to Vegas, because I
had foiled a planned trip to Florida where they planned to spend some time against my will and that of the
3ABN board's. I also heard them plan a trip to New York as well as plan her middle of July trip with him to
Scandinavia where they planned boating trips ect together. Again her son was not involved in either trip.
But more specifically, was never mentioned in the planning of this trip on this phone conversation that I
heard that lasted appr. 1 1/2 hours. I heard other things that I don't need to mention here. Linda was given
a choice to stop all of these travels and the long phone conversations almost everyday with this man or to
end up losing her ministry and also her marriage. She chose to keep this relationship with this man over all
counsel from people like Mark Finley, Dr. Thompson, Kay Kuzma, Pastor John Lomacang, and even
outside Nazarene husband and wife marriage counseling team chosen by Linda, who told her after our 8
hour counseling session with them that she must stop this relationship with this man or she would end up
losing her marriage and ministry.

Anyway, below is a list of subjects that I have seen that are being talked about by CA. I am willing to
answer these questions and more. Please let these folk or anyone else know that if they have questions, I
am as close as my email.

God Bless!

Danny

ps I wrote this in a hurry, I hope it make sense.

Danny Shelton


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-8 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 3 1 of 3


(Text Box comment Ex. G)
----- Original Message -----
From: Danny Shelton
To: Linda Shelton
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: Re:


Linda Sue, You sound so much like Kenny when you say you made some mistakes. I've yet to hear you
say that this Dr. situation has been a pile of poop in our life. Not a piece of chocolate cake that you
desire but can't have. Let me hear you say specifically what you have done. What mistakes do you admit
to? Let me tell you a few important ones, as I see them.

1. Coming home and on Feb. 7th telling the world that this Dr. had become your burden bearer. The
Nazarene counselors told you this was wrong. Only your husband could be your burden bearer.
2. Not stopping all calls to this man when I saw that they were no longer about Nathan, but you and the
Dr's new friendship. I told you if these calls were about Nathan, then let me be on them with you two
and you refused.
3. Buying tickets behind my back and planning on going on vacation to Florida with him behind my back.
It doesn't make any difference whether Brenda was going with you or not, it was still wrong. You had to
deceive me about your relationship with him to do this terrible thing. Don't forget, you finally admitted that
you had a "blast" with him in Norway and just wanted to have more fun in Florida with him without your
husband along. This is wrong in any marriage. Especially a marriage that has to be above reproach.
(Text Box comment +)
4. April 15, promising to not talk to the Dr. anymore for two weeks, then immediately calling him the next
day Friday, then staying home from Tn. Sabbath trip, so you could call him and talk to him for more hours
when you PROMISED me if he called you would not answer or hang up! Calling him again on Monday
and Tuesday, hiding all these calls and denying them. I told you then if the relationship were of the Lord if
would bring good fruit. It made a liar out of you because you constantly had to try to deceive me to keep
this relationship going.
5. Buying and hiding from me a new cell phone and buying numerous prepaid cards to keep this
relationship going, all behind my back.
6. Lying to me about going to Florida to buy property for Alyssa on my birthday when I found out that
you were meeting him in Florida, once again behind my back.
7. Then the next day me personally hearing you tell him that your husband didn't buy into the idea of your
going to Florida to buy property. Then inviting him to meet you in Las Vegas and when he had
apprehensions about it, you then told him you would fly to New York and meet him there. You also told
him that you were still coming to spend and extended vacation with him in Norway in July, which you did.
Asking him to come across the ocean and get you, and telling him how you trusted him because he didn't
DUMP you because of me making you write an email to him telling him your relationship was over.
(Text Box comment +)
Linda, I could go on and on but I've said enough for you to get the point that at some time in your life you
will have to confess these sins to the Lord if you want his blessings on your new ministry. And at some
point if you want to come back and start over with me, you have to at least acknowledge all of the above
and more was wrong. You gave your heart to that man a long time ago.
Linda, your sins are destroying your ministry that God called you to do. Not mine or anyone else's but
yours. You need to understand that.
I did not over react. I did the only thing that I knew how to do to keep you from going into the arms of
another man and destroying our 20 yr marriage and ministry together. Had I slapped you around it would
have been wrong. Had I done nothing but watch it all, I would have been wrong. I tried to intervene by
getting spiritual counselors that I thought you would listen to. You did not and still don't.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-8 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 3 2 of 3

Mark Finley told you the FIRST thing you had to do to start restoration was to drop the Dr. and you have
refused. I will not be in a relationship with you as long as you think that this man is your friend and you
want to run to him everytime something doesn't go your way.
Before I will let that happen, I am willing to stay away from the woman I love more than anything in the
world, for the rest of my life. I could not live under those terms.
I have to see some actions on your part about dropping this Dr. first. Otherwise don't call and ask me
questions about how it's going to be if you come back to 3ABN. I will NEVER take you back as long as
you're so deceived that you think this man is your friend. He, not me, will ultimately be your destruction
here and possibly in the eternity.
Please quit pointing your finger to me and ask God to show you the truth about what you have done. This
man is not going to marry you. If he did, he will not treat you like a queen, making over your beauty and
giving you back rubs and foot rubs, and allowing you to run freely with his money. He wants a Suzy
homemaker. This relationship will end one way or the other. It will not last as it was spond by the devil.
He knew your price, to get you to give your heart to another man.
It may have started innocent enough on your part, but it has become a far cry from innocent many
months ago. As a Professional, he knew he was destroying your relationship with me all along. He
coveted you and has now deceived you.
I've thought about this too Linda. I'm not willing to go back to that misery of always knowing you were
driving around talking to him for hours at a time planning ways to be together all behind my back. I can
never take anything like that again. It nearly tore my heart out. I truly hope it never happens to you!


I'll always love you. You are the love of my life. If we get together again, there will never be room for
the Dr. or any other man in our life, the rest of our lives. The marriage counselors told me privately that
10 men can't fill the emotional needs that you have now. They said this Dr. will never satisfy you when
it's just you and him. You will never satisfy each other. You two would never trust each other either
because down deep, you both know what you have done, and you know it is wrong and sin.


Love is forever!
from the love of your life
to the love of my life.
ps. I miss the old Linda terribly. Please do the right thing.
If it doesn't work for us, please let's don't be enemies. God could not bless either of us if we hate each
other. We have to forgive. Linda I have already forgiven you. That's why I'm able to help you for the last
several months. I just want to love you.


----- Original Message -----
From: Linda Shelton
To: Danny Shelton
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:29 PM
Subject: Re:


I know this has never sunk in when you've heard it before. I know you're more concerned about how
you feel as opposed to how I feel. But I guess it's therapeutic for me to vent and let you hear it one
more time. But you not only destroyed me, you killed me. You used me to try to cover your mistakes.
You over-reacted, you had a pity party with too many people which inevitably destroyed my character in
this church. Bad news travels fast. I think it shocked you that it happened so fast...in fact, in about 3



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-8 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 3 of 3 3 of 3

weeks I was done. I remember your tears. Many tears...but it was too late. And now you continue to
use me as the scapegoat. You know, I know and God knows that you can never, ever backtrack from
what you've done or what you've said. The damage is repairable, but only at your expense...and you're
not willing to put your neck on the line, even if it means making things right. You know Dan, like I said
recently, I admit and have publically admitted that I could have


 exercised better wisdom during the time of crisis. But you admit to no wrong. I think if I were you I'd
be concerned about this. Although you see things your way...maybe, just maybe you're wrong. Maybe
you did over-react and stick your foot in your mouth. Maybe you did act in anger not knowing what the
results would be. Maybe there is a bit of blood on your hands. As sinners born with carnal natures, we
can never be too sure. Can we??


No, I probably will never get over this. It's been worse than a nightmare, because it goes beyond what a
human mind can imagine. But I'll always know the truth. No matter how you try to sugar-coat it, I know
the truth. I guess I am an extremist when it comes to positive thinking because somehow I think you
can't really be that bad. You can't really have done what you did. You can't really continue to do what
you do. And really someday you will make things right. But I suppose I'm delusional. My mistakes
were mistakes but your mistakes were vicious attacks. May God have mercy on you. Many really miss
my ministry that God gave me to do. Can man mess up God's plans at times?? Ask John the Baptist.
Ask Peter. Ask the martyrs. Does God have plan B?? Sure He does and I'm asking Him to put me
there. Dan, it's a crying shame!!


Have a nice life.


----- Original Message -----
From: Danny Shelton
To: Linda Shelton
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 8:37 PM


Happy Sabbath!
(Text Box comment blank)
from: the love of your life!



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-9 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 7

Ex. H



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-9 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 7



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-9 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 3 of 7

.


.



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-9 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 4 of 7

.



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-9 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 5 of 7

.



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-9 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 6 of 7



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-9 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 7 of 7



Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-10 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1 1 of 1

Ex. I


From:
"Danny Shelton"
Date:
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:45:41 -0600
To:
"Arild Abrahamsen"


.
.
My wife has told me of all your planned meetings together. April in Florida, which was kept a secret


.
.
from me, your plans on seeing her again in May at Campmeeting. Again in June in Norway and probably
again in Sept. when her daughter comes.
You said that the fact that she's who she is and how young and beautiful she is has nothing to do with
your relationship with her and all the hours you spend talking on the telephone thousands of miles apart.
You told me you talk to a lot of women like that. I wonder if you would fly from Norway to Florida at
the drop of the hat, to see all these other women's sons? Especially if they were old, ugly, fat, or
otherwise unknown? I believe you used her son to get to her vulnerable, personal side. You quit
consentrating on the problem with her son and found your way in to her emotional side.
She has now seen the evil that Satan tried to do through your "good intentioned" relationship. Never
forget Satan knows all of our weaknesses. He definately has found yours and hers, in this instance, but
praise the Lord, she has asked forgiveness for hers.
Pride is a terrible thing, we all fight it. Your not admitting that you have crossed a line in that relationship
is unacceptable. Maybe some people there might believe that story, but it certainly would not be bought
here in America.
It appears she won't be going to Florida when you meet with her son, I wonder how this will change the

equation?
I'm really hoping for your sake that you quit living this lie. Ask yourself some of the questions that this
professional counselor gave us concerning Doctor and patient relationships with married women and see
it you would pass the test. At this point you have failed.


One last thing. When one is dealing in the physical world, Satan is the Prince. That is scriptural,
according to the bible. Anyone can be deceived. But when you deal in the spiritual world, God gives one
eye salve to clear the vision. The spiritual realm says that you crossed the line and became too physically
or emotionally attached. The physical realm causes one to justify ones actions even though they may be
directly opposed to the bible. All the excuses and all the justifying in the world will not deceive those who
are looking to God for spiritual guidance. Please quit looking from the physical of what seems right and all
the talk about good intentions and high and lofty conversations, and let God take you to the spiritual realm
to see sin for what it is. It is destructive. It destroys. That is the road you two were on.


If I get in my car and plan on going to church and drive out of my driveway and run over a pedestrian
and kill him, he is dead. All the good intentions in the world about going to church, won't take away the
sorry and pain that it would cause this persons family. Good intentions still can kill and destroy.
I believe that's what you should come to "grips" with. No one doubts your good intentions, but you got
caught up in the physical. Those conversations, for hours on end, felt good. Therefore your feelings
would not allow you to see the damage being done. And unless you are seeking the truth on this matter,
this letter will seem laughable to you. If you're seeking truth I believe God will open your eyes.


I'm not asking for any further response. These are just comments that I felt needed to be made.



Ex. J
Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-11 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1
1

Fw:

.


.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-12 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1 1 of 1
Logged

Fran

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 572
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2008, 09:28:53 PM »

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-12 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1 1 of 1
Ex. K
Subject:
Fw:
From:
"Linda Shelton"
Date:
Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:29:26 -0500
To:
"aaedta"
----- Original Message -----
From: Danny Shelton
To: Linda Shelton
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:57 PM
Linda Sue,
You may fool some of the people by these kinds of emails to me, but the truth is you cannot and will
never fool me about your sinful relationship with this Dr.
Since Feb. the 7th when you made your famous speech about him on 3ABN how that he had become
your burden bearer, I have not had you as a wife. you left me for him way back then. I was the enemy
and he was your chocolate cake, to quote you. Also you said he was your safety net. This was wrong, is
wrong, and always will be wrong.
The reason I thought the divorce was necessary was you stated that the reason you could spend nearly
four days and most of 4 nights with him during campmeeting against my objections, was because you
didn't really feel you were married to me anymore.
When I heard you talking to him on the phone planning and unholy meeting in Florida without my
knowledge and then having to cancel when I found out and I heard you ask him to meet you in Las
Vegas and then in New York, as well as heard you planning your European vacation to Norway,
including you and him going boating together, I knew the marriage was over.
I could not live with such an affair going on before my very eyes and hearing you justify this sin with no
repentant spirit whatsoever. I told you for months that if you dropped the doctor that I would forgive you
for this dastardly situation you created with this man, and try to start all over. But you refused to drop him
then and even to this day.
It's funny when you say that you stopped this relationship till I told you that you could start it again, that
you always leave out how you lied about all the phone calls you were having with him. You would tell me
you had stopped, but then I would find your phone cards and see that time and time again you had lied
about them.
Yes, I did tell you I would love you enough to let you go, because I couldn't keep you anyway against
your will.
You always forget to say though that a few days later after me telling you this that I emailed you and told
you that as long as you were my wife I still forbid you to stay in this adulterous relationship. Yet to this
day you continue, even just coming home from a four day vacation with him again, without Johann this
time.
I still love you alot. I only wish you would admit what all other husbands and wives know, that there
cannot be three people in the marriage!
X


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-13 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1 1 of 1
Ex. L
----- Original Message -----
From: Danny Shelton
To: Linda Shelton
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 12:40 AM
Linda Doll;
You made a statement late this evening that during Feb. and March you were innocent of being too
invovled with the Dr. Linda the problem was everyone involved knew the Dr. was not innocent. He
knew exactly where he was going with this relationship and was able to successfully mold you the way
he wanted. Even to the point of him convincing you that it was ok for you to go on a vacation without
your husband to his condo.
All pastors and counselors to this day will tell you that he was a snake in the grass all along. We could
see it but you couldn't. That's why I fought so hard for you. The snake won round one. But the battle for
you for marriage and ministry and your soul is not over. I believe the Lord will ultimately win out.
Your continued relationship with this man is living proof that his plan for you succeeded. These trips to
Norway and his to the states so you guys can be together is not sanctioned by God and will be the death
of your new ministry.
He's not and never has been a piece of chocolate cake to you. He's been a pile of poop that you ate
because it had chocolate covering. But the chocolate coating is about to fall off. Too many people are
praying for you to see the truth.
(Text Box comment +)
(Text Box comment +)
Love is Forever!
Bro. Dan
Make plans for January!


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-14 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 4 1 of 4
Ex. M
----- Forwarded message from Danny Shelton ----Date:
Sun, 16 May 2004 13:29:09 -0500
From: Danny Shelton
Reply-To: Danny Shelton
Subject: Re:
To: amoore@...
Linda, you need to get honest with yourself and everyone else. When your relationship first started with
the doctor it may have been professional, but when it quit being about Nathan and he became, in your
own words, one of your three best friends in the world, I knew you had crossed a line.
I told you if your relationship were on a professional level then I should be on the conversations, as I too
care about Nathan.
It was then that you informed me, around the middle of Feb. that this was no longer about Nathan but
about you and his friendship and that I was not, and I quote you, "Going to horn in on your relationship".
Linda, the very fact that I have proof of your vacation plans alone with him in several different locations,
will tell anyone this is not about professional anything----except maybe ADULTERY. The pregnancy
(Text Box comment +)
test kit a week ago Friday pretty well confirms that.
It's too bad that you didn't start your period one day sooner, you wouldn't have had to buy it. You told me
yourself when you got home at 7:00pm that you had just started your period that evening.
I have the receipt. I know when you bought it and it was before you started your period.
Anyway, you may fool some people with your stories, but you know that I know about your trying to get
me to buy you a ticket last week for a trip to Florida this coming week pretending to look at property that
you might want to buy when Alyssa moves there after getting out of school. The problem is why would
(Text Box comment +)
you look at property next week in Florida, when she doesn't even know where she will work. Florida's a
big state. I know (as you well know) that you told the doctor that I didn't buy into the idea of looking at
property and that I knew he was going to be in Florida this coming week. So, I will always know that you
then invited him to spend a short vacation with you in Las Vegas, telling him that I wouldn't suspect him
to be there as you had told me that you were going there to establish residency for a quick divorce. You
(Text Box comment +)
know that I also know for a fact, that you then invited him to meet you in New York for a few days
vacation, loring him with the idea about great computor stores there. You also talked about going to
Norway to be with him there.
Remember, you told me a few weeks ago that you could seduce him into marrying you. Obviously, from
everything I know, that's exactly what your trying to do.
Some people will believe your "professional" relationship stories, but God, you and me will always know
that you have committed adultery first in your heart and second in your actions.
If you can see the truth, I am still willing to forgive you and go on with marriage. At present I cannot
forgive that which you have not repented of.
Love,
your husband
Please leave the "professional relationship stories" for the uninformed and unsuspecting. Your wasting
your time to try to talk to me about this "lie"
----- Original Message -----
From: <amoore@...>
To: "Danny Shelton"
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 10:13 AM
Subject: Re:


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-14 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 4 2 of 4

Quoting Danny Shelton:

Linda,
You keep saying that I trash you to people, but I am shocked at how many people you have
trashed me to.
For instance, talking to Donna Sue, (your ex mother in law) is like putting it in the
newspaper and I'm sure that's what you had in mind. But you should know this plan is not
working.


Correction: I've said nothing to Donna Sue.

When people in town call me and tell me what they've heard, all I have to do is tell them
that you think it's ok to have a phone relationship with another man with conversations from
1-4 hrs at a time, several times a week. They all are shocked that you believe this is ok to
do. I don't talk to them about adultery, I don't bad mouth you, I simply tell them that though
you have promised many times in the last 3 months or more to stop, you now are talking to
him several times a week.

Correction: Once again you are giving them a partial story, (as you have done all along)...additionally, if
you told them what you have done: trashed my name and reputation to 3ABN workers, the SDA Church
and the WORLD completely ruining my ministry, they would have a much different perception of you.
No matter how you want to sugar-coat it, this is nothing short of vicious and demonic...especially since
when this thing started you had no proof and your "guesses" about this relationship were completely
wrong!!

The ones who have called me from learning about this through the Donna Sue Bozarth
system, immediately say they cannot believe that you, as a Christian and 3ABN Vice
President can think this is ok. I don't even have to tell them about your planned vacations
togather, while we're still married. That would be too shocking to them.
(Text Box comment +)
Any married person knows that it is wrong to have this kind of relationship with another
person of the opposite sex, over your husbands or wife's objections.

Correction: Again, you fail to mention the professional relationship we have had beginning first with
Nathan, and then progressing to this incredibly high stress and destructive circumstance that you have
personally orchestrated. There are good and bad ways at looking at a subject. Normally men who love
their wives will try to portray their "loved ones" in the most appealing light, even if they are experiencing
communication problems. You have most decidedly with great determination showed me that you DO
NOT LOVE ME since you have chosen to portray a picture of your wife in the worst possible
light...taking 25% truth and mixing it with 75% error.


(Text Box comment +)
The people who have called me locally, after hearing about this through the Donna Sue
system, are not even Christians, yet they immediately respond, "I can't believe Linda can
believe it's alright to talk to another man over your objections. I wouldn't have put up with it
this long, I would have booted my spouse out.Bob Ellis is not the only one hearing it through
the Donna Sue system. Guess how it could have gotten to city hall? Who would have ever
guessed you would be using your ex husband's family to spread false rumors about me.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-14 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 3 of 4 3 of 4

Correction: None of this has been initiated by me.

I think you remember that last time you and me and your ex in laws were all at city hall, I
was rescuing you from charges of attempted murder, by him. Fortunately, I was your knight
in shining armor at that time and was able to help keep you from going to prison.

My how things have changed in our relationship...now you're the one firing the shots instead of trying to
protect me...under the guise of "standing for principle." How does your actions fit with the principle of
"Husbands, love your wives as Christ loves the church?"

Your trying to gain support from the world is only backfiring for you as even the world
knows there cannot be 3 people in a marriage relationship. Please get on your knees to God
and give up your foolish pride and ask God to forgive you of this terrible sin. Once you've
given it to God, I'm willing to forgive you as we're still married and I love you very much.

I already have asked God to forgive my known and un-known sin. As far as the marriage is concerned, I
will need to see you give up your foolish pride and make right the sins you have committed against me.
The fact is DAN, that my reputation and ministry are DESTROYED! The question is "Who started the
rumors?" "Who altered the facts to where people all over think "Linda has been unfaithful to her husband
and as a result is getting fired from 3ABN?" Who, as President, tolerated my own workers getting
interviewed in an attempt to find reason to fire me...since talking to a man on the phone was not
enough??"

Once we're divorced, or once I know that you've met him again, somewhere to physically
be with him, it will be too late.
He has you right where he wants you, totally, in your own words, "trusting him". He is not a
Christian, he's being used by the devil. I'm amazed at how quickly the world recognizes this
fact that he has been a snake in the grass, yet you claim to still see him as your piece of
chocolate cake, that you intend to have.

Correction: Once again, as always, you are drawing conclusions without acquiring the facts...from me.

I also am aware that you have talked to Burnie D. That also has failed, as Walt has
brought her son, who as you know is a 3ABN board member, up to date, on the truth of this
relationship as well as your position and work relationship here at the ministry.

Correction: I am not interested in searching out people to tell my story. But if they come to me and ask
me about it, I will tell them the truth. Bernie came to me.

I think I will always love you, but I won't always be here to take you back in the future. I
have to go on with life. I can't worry about all the places that you're planning to meet this
doctor for vacations and time alone togather anymore. Yes, I think I'll know about the
(Text Box comment +)
when's and where's, but I have a ministry to run and need to consentrate on that.

Correction: Love?? I don't believe, under the circumstances, you even know what it is. However, I am
still praying that God's will may be done in this situation. Considering you are insisting in buying out my
half of the house, this (once again) sends a strong message to me that you want a divorce. This combined
with your e-mails to my family, the typed document of how you want to divide our property, your insults,
condemnation and continued negativity, your actions putting down your wife, ETC., ETC., ETC., sends a
strong message to me that you want a divorce. Although I have not initiated this action, I will grant you


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-14 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 4 of 4 4 of 4

the divorce you are seeking with great determination... and although it will be VERY DIFFICULT for
me under the circumstances, I will go on with my life too.

If you want to talk please give me a call, otherwise I'll try not to bother you anymore.
Friday evening and Sabbath morning, May 14 and 15, was just one more time that I had my
hopes up, but you, once again had to talk to the doctor and let him discourage you from
staying in your marriage and ministry. I would hate to be him on judgement day.

Correction: This is so laughable it doesn't even deserve a reply. "Your hopes up??"

Even if you decide to divorce me, which you've said your going to do for the last several
weeks, I still would like to part friends. Who knows, we might need each other in the
future.
I still love you very much
Dan

Correction: LAUGHABLE!!


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-15 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1
Logged

Fran

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 572
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2008, 09:33:39 PM »


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-15 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1

Ex. N


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 1 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 11

Ex. O



Sign Up!

Home Page
Site Map
Tommy Shelton
Danny Shelton

ASI

 Smokescreen
Abuse of Power
Ethical

 Allegations

Duane Clem
Fired
One-Way
"Gag Order"
Unbiblical
Divorce?

Meet the Board
Not Fired for ...
"Me or Nathan"
May Ultimatum
Pregnancy Test
½ the House
House Contract
No Proof: 7/17
Pile of What?
The Lost Bet
Walt Admits
Battered Wife:

 "Home Loan?"
Guam Divorce

Employee

 Handbook
Defy the Board
Barbara Kerr
Fiscalini Fired

Financial

 Allegations
Correspondence
Untruths
Alleged Illegal

 Activities
Mene, Mene,
Tekel, Parsin


Danny's Apologists
Leonard Westphal
3ABN Board
Litigation, etc.
Letters of Support
Letters of Criticism

Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test

< Prev. Next >

Evidence of Adultery, or Stupid Joke Gone
Awry?

On this web page we'd like to look at some of 3ABN president Danny
Shelton's prima facie proof that his ex-wife and 3ABN's ex-co-founder,
Linda Shelton, had committed adultery. This proof is referred to in the form
letter 3ABN board chairman Walt Thompson, MD, was sending out at least in
May and June of 2006, as well as in other of his communications:

May 16, 2006, Email of Walt Thompson, MD

-------- Original Message -------From:
Walt Thompson
To: ******

CC: Mollie Steenson
Subject: 3abn
Date: May 16, 2006 10:59:28 PM EDT

Dear ******,

...

... And as you might expect, Danny was by this time
checking things out pretty carefully. One night she came
home all cheery. While she and Danny were getting ready
for bed, she left to do something else (I have forgotten
what). While out, Danny found a sack of things in the
closet. Upon opening it, he found a pregnancy test kit. (He
is "fixed" so he cannot have more children.) When she
found out that he had discovered it, she was at first angry

http://www.save-3abn.com/danny-shelton-demise-of-marriage-pregn... 8/31/2008 11:26 AM


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 2 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 11

News Releases
Sign Up!
Contact Us

Added 5/23/2008
Initial Tax Case
Public Record


Added 4/10/2008
Tax Case Lost
Copyright Trouble


Added 3/29/2008
Gilley Winning Staff


Added 3/7/2008
Terminated


Added 2/10/2008
Objections Heard


Added 1/25/2008
Church Vote


Must Read:
Mom in Pain #1
Mene, Mene,
Tekel, Parsin
The Actual Lawsuit
IRS Criminal
Investigation


because he had "snooped" in her things, and then told him
she had just purchased it to see his reaction.

...

Sincerely in Jesus' precious name,

Walter Thompson
Chairman, 3Abn board
Walter Thompson MD

June 13, 2006, Email of Walt Thompson, MD

-------- Original Message -------From:
Walt Thompson
To: ******
Subject: Re: 3abn
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:24:27 -0500

Dear ******,

...

... And as you might expect, Danny was by this time
checking things out pretty carefully. One night she came
home all cheery. While she and Danny were getting ready
for bed, she left to do something else (I have forgotten
what). While out, Danny found a sack of things in the
closet. Upon opening it, he found a pregnancy test kit. (He
is "fixed" so he cannot have more children.) When she
found out that he had discovered it, she was at first angry
because he had "snooped" in her things, and then told him
she had just purchased it to see his reaction. ...

...

Sincerely in Jesus' precious name,

Walter Thompson MD

http://www.save-3abn.com/danny-shelton-demise-of-marriage-pregn... 8/31/2008 11:26 AM


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 3 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 3 of 11

Chairman, 3ABN Board
Walter Thompson MD


Thus we are left with a question: Did Linda buy the pregnancy test just to see
Danny's reaction, or did she buy it because she thought she might be pregnant
with Dr. Arild Abrahamsen's child? Before answering that easy question, we
should take a look at others who have echoed Walt Thompson's claim.

Tommy Shelton Echoes the Pregnancy
Test Claim

The following is an email sent out by Gailon Arthur Joy in early November,
which is an attempt to answer questions about the morals of Linda Shelton,
questions raised by Tommy Shelton several months before.

Strange that Tommy would be raising such questions when, to our knowledge,
he still has not adequately addressed the child molestation allegations leveled
against him over perhaps the last quarter century.

-------- Original Message -------From:
AUReporter
To: AURToday

CC: AUReporter
Subject: Answers to your questions, part 2
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:43 AM

EMAIL FROM TOMMY SHELTON AUGUST
2006

Mr. X,

...

If they were only doctor and patient or casual friends, why
did Linda buy a pregnancy test after a trip to Norway. She
knew her husband had had a vasectomy.

http://www.save-3abn.com/danny-shelton-demise-of-marriage-pregn... 8/31/2008 11:26 AM


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 4 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 4 of 11

Answer: Allysa is the purchaser of record for the ept. ... as
a joke–perhaps a poor judgement .... But then who knew
Danny was really working on the motive for a divorce at
the time and looking for every ludicrous excuse to justify
his mid-life trade-in, apparently a tradition for the Shelton
Boys, of course with the exception of Tommy, who,
though married to Carol, has allegedly a proven track
record of youthful male preference, purportedly including
their own adopted son (******), requiring counseling in
Nashville.

...

Yours in the Blessed Hope

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter
...

It is clear that Tommy is suggesting that Linda thought she might have gotten
pregnant after her trip to Norway. That point is pivotal later on.

Linda's Warning of May 6, 2004

In the email below, Linda writes from her daughter's email account, warning
Dr. Abrahamsen that she was going to plant a pregnancy test in her car. Danny
would then find it on Friday, May 7, 2004, if he searched her car as usual. She
says she wished she could see his face when he found it.

The fact that she sent this email from her daughter's account suggests that her
daughter was in on the scheme.

-------- Original Message -------From:
[linda Shelton's daughter]
To: [Dr. Arild Abrahamsen]

Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 17:21:55 -0700 (PDT)

http://www.save-3abn.com/danny-shelton-demise-of-marriage-pregn... 8/31/2008 11:26 AM


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 5 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 5 of 11

...

You know how Dan has been searching my car? I've got a
little surprise for him. But I wanted to warn you that a
brand new rumor may very well make its way to Norway.
Tomorrow he's going to find a carefully hidden pregnancy
test in it. My only regret is that I won't be there to see his
face. Do you think it will be worth the rumors?? I think
so!!

...

LS

Is May 7 the Correct Date?

It is quite important that we nail down the exact date the pregnancy test was
found. Danny's email of Sunday, May 16, 2004, a reply to Linda's
"Corrections" email sent earlier that day, does that well, for it confirms that the
pregnancy test had to have been found on Friday, May 7, 2004, a week
before Friday, May 14.

-------- Original Message -------From:
Danny Shelton
To: [linda Shelton's daughter]
Subject: Re:
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 13:29:09 -0500

Linda, you need to get honest with yourself and everyone
else. When your relationship first started with the doctor it
may have been professional ....

...

Linda, the very fact that I have proof of your vacation
plans alone with him in several different locations, will tell
anyone this is not about professional anything----except

http://www.save-3abn.com/danny-shelton-demise-of-marriage-pregn... 8/31/2008 11:26 AM


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 6 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 6 of 11

maybe ADULTERY. The pregnancy test kit a week ago
Friday pretty well confirms that.

[We've deleted certain information about biorhythms that
Danny elaborates upon to "prove" that Linda thought she
might be pregnant, and thus that that is why she bought the
pregnancy test. Frankly, we can't see how we wouldn't get
criticized by nearly everyone if we included that. ]

...

Love,

your husband

Please leave the "professional relationship stories" for the
uninformed and unsuspecting. Your wasting your time to
try to talk to me about this "lie"

Does Linda Stand by Her Story?

In March 2007, Linda updated the "Questions" page of her website. Here's
what she said about the pregnancy test at that time.

Q. What about the pregnancy test?
A. Let me clear up the situation here. Did I buy the
pregnancy test? My daughter, Alyssa, and I bought
it together, chuckling all the way out of the store.
Did I have personal fears of being pregnant?
Absolutely not. What was your motive in the
purchase? My motive was twofold. I was bewildered
about Dan's behavior. He was searching my car and
my personal belongings behind my back. I would be
able to expose this activity with him coming forward
with such a "find." I also wanted to lighten up a
situation that was bizarre and ridiculous, never
http://www.save-3abn.com/danny-shelton-demise-of-marriage-pregn... 8/31/2008 11:26 AM


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 7 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 7 of 11

thinking my husband would grab it declaring he had
"proof."

Last Contact with Dr. Abrahamsen

In perusing various emails from Danny, we have yet to see him accusing Linda
of being in the same location as Dr. Abrahamsen anytime between February 6,
2004, and late May 2004. Here is the email nailing down when Linda left
Norway in February to return home:

-------- Original Message -------From:
Arild Abrahamsen
To: [Danny Shelton]
Date: Thursday, February 05, 2004 5:47 AM

Hi Hon,

Sorry I've been unable to communicate before now...our
sleeping schedule and activity schedule and the
international phone not working has conflicted with getting
through to you. But I'm sure you've been busy too.

Norway is gorgeous, but what makes it the most special is
that I'm seeing a miracle happen right before my eyes with
Nathan. The transformation is incredible. He looks great.
He's gained weight, He's quit smoking and his attitude has
been great. He's developed a real trust and friendship with
the doctor, and he'd like to come back in the summer. I'm
hoping you will allow Nathan to stay in the apartments for
a couple of weeks when he gets home so his drug friends
won't have easy access to him. Please pray about it.

We leave tomorrow and I look forward to seeing you in
Atlanta. Should I meet you outside of customs You can
e-mail me back at this address if you have a chance. Well,
gotta go.

http://www.save-3abn.com/danny-shelton-demise-of-marriage-pregn... 8/31/2008 11:26 AM


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 8 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 8 of 11

Love you,
LINDA

Did Linda Think She Might Be Pregnant?

Let us summarize:


Linda left Dr. Abrahamsen's clinic in Norway on February 6, 2004.
Linda warned Dr. Abrahamsen that she had gotten a pregnancy test for
Danny to find on May 7 when he searched her car.
The pregnancy test was indeed found by Danny on May 7, 2004.
There are no known accusations of Linda and Dr. Abrahamsen meeting
between those two dates.
They did converse on the telephone a disputed number of times for
disputed lengths of time.
Given the facts, there are essentially only two ways that Linda Shelton could
have thought she was pregnant:


Linda thought she might be pregnant because she had talked on the
telephone too much.
Linda thought she might have become pregnant on or before February
6, 2004, which would make her about 15 weeks pregnant on May 6
(gestation would have started two weeks before February 6). But she
couldn't tell for sure.
We have heard it said repeatedly that Linda is naive. Is it at all possible that she
is so naive that she thought that she had gotten pregnant over the telephone, or
that she couldn't tell that she was 15 weeks pregnant without a pregnancy test?

Yet isn't the second option what Tommy Shelton was suggesting in his August
2006 email? Linda bought a pregnancy test in May because of a trip to
Norway that ended February 6? And how is it that Walt Thompson, MD,
would be spreading this story when it seems so unlikely from a medical point of
view?

It is said that some women carry babies to full term and never figure out what is
going on. April Branum is one recent example, but then, as the article points
out, that was due to her weighing 420 pounds, and Linda doesn't weigh

http://www.save-3abn.com/danny-shelton-demise-of-marriage-pregn... 8/31/2008 11:26 AM


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 9 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 9 of 11

anywhere close to that.

We have to conclude that the overwhelming evidence is that the whole
pregnancy test incident was a stupid prank. And it was incredibly stupid,
because if you have a paranoid, jealous husband whom a doctor has
concluded is "psychotic" and "out to lunch," to quote Danny's terminology
about Dr. Abrahamsen's conclusions, you don't go buying a pregnancy test.
Especially is this the case when your husband has already told your family 9
days earlier that the marriage is over because you've hidden his gun.

Danny Corrects Gailon

We'll include just two more emails on this web page. In Gailon's answers to the
questions raised by Tommy Shelton, Gailon claimed that Linda's daughter was
the purchaser of the pregnancy test. Danny claims to have proof that Linda was
the one who bought the pregnancy test instead, but he makes quite clear to
Gailon that he won't be showing that proof to him:

-------- Original Message -------From:
Danny Shelton
To: AUReporter

CC: [Walt Thompson]
Subject: RE: Answers to your questions - part 2
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 11:04 AM

Linda and Arild must be belly laughing you! They could
have only dreamed she could find someone to believe all
of her stories! You continue to amaze me at how
unprofessional you are by printing her stories without any
documented proof. This does make you equally liable.

Example:

Did Alyssa show you the receipt in which she bought the
pregnancy test kit? Where is the proof? You boldly print
that the receipt holder is Allyssa. There is none! How do I
know?

I have the receipt listing the pregnancy test kit but it was
purchased on Linda's credit card! Therefore Gailon, Linda

http://www.save-3abn.com/danny-shelton-demise-of-marriage-pregn... 8/31/2008 11:26 AM


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 10 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 10 of 11

is the purchaser on record! I have witnesses to this fact. I
have long ago showed it to church leaders. It's these kind
of statements from you that discredit you.

It's this kind of wrong info that you have bought hook line
and sinker from Linda this whole time. You want me to
show you all my proof but Linda only gives you words and
you buy it. Why make her document what she says to
you?

That's why you are not in the mix anymore. Because you
are obviously on a mission to destroy, not find truth.

This situation is now in the hands of respected Church
people. They will see the receipt, not you.

...

So, where is your proof for all of these things except
Linda's words to you. Once again, why do you believe her
without any proof?

...

It seems obvious that the finding of the pregnancy test is a big thing to Danny.
Does he really think his ex-wife thought she had gotten pregnant over the
telephone, or that she needed a pregnancy test to tell her that she was 15
weeks pregnant?

Gailon Replies to Danny

Gailon points out that Linda is not necessarily the source of his information, and
that it is difficult to figure out exactly what happened if Danny persistently
refuses to cooperate in the investigation.

-------- Original Message -------From:
AUReporter
To: [Danny Shelton]

http://www.save-3abn.com/danny-shelton-demise-of-marriage-pregn... 8/31/2008 11:26 AM


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 11 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 11 of 11
Logged

Fran

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 572
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2008, 09:36:33 PM »


Proof of Adultery: The Pregnancy Test—Evidence of Adultery, or St... 11 of 11

Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-16 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 11 of 11

Subject: Re: Answers to your questions - part 2
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:49:36 -0500

What church leaders were shown the receipt...I could
always confirm your statement by interviewing respected
church leaders? Right?

You and Mollie have made it clear you will not show any
"documentation"...therefore, statements are the only
recourse. Put your evidence where your mouth is... show
to those of us that can track it out and get responses.
Proof is only proof if it can be sourced and verified
without a reasonable explanation, explanations you clearly
do not want heard!!!

Danny, it is you that continue to hide behind the
supposition that you have documentation but fail to show
anyone. When board members have not seen these things
then one must assume they are fiction. Roll em out or
suffer from fictionitis!!!

Further, you keep referring to Linda as a source...Linda
apparently had little to do with the finances, therefore
Linda was not the source/sources in the subject case.

...

Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter

< Prev. Next >

Save-3ABN.com
Not © 2008
http://www.save-3abn.com/danny-shelton-demise-of-marriage-pregn... 8/31/2008 11:26 AM


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-17 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 8 1 of 8
Ex. P
-------- Original Message -------Subject:
Re: 3abn
Date:Sun, 8 Jul 2007
From:Walt Thompson
To:
Dear *****,
The quotes that you have copied here were posted since the law suit was filed. Things have improved a great
deal since then.
As I understand it, Linda's mother called Linda on a phone shared by she and Danny and left the message. No,
her mother is not on Danny's side.
I do not have the info on the dates of the tickets. I don't think that I indicated May 7 in my correspondence. I believe
it was later than that, and easily 5-6 weeks. I am sorry, I have made no effort to determine exact dates. I am
reporting only what I believe I was told.
(Text Box comment +)
Sincerely,
Walter Thompson MD

----- Original Message -----

From:
To: Walt Thompson
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007
Subject: Re: 3abn

Dear Walt Thompson,

Thank you for your comments. I did not expect an answer so quickly but I appreciate your efforts.

As I said before I am a person who will question until I am satisfied and know clearly what is the truth.

I think it would be terrible if your words were twisted so that people would get the wrong idea about
what you were trying to say so this morning I did a search on your name and 3ABN and found some
places where I could look to see some of your quotes. (I checked out a site called
www.blacksda.com) At that site I did another search on your name and found these two quotes. I am
not too good at navigating around that site so maybe there are more but this is all I could find this
morning. Could you point out to me what part of the following was a misquote? See quotes at end of
message.

I almost overlooked your comment about Linda's mother. Is she on Danny's side and giving information
about phone messages or did someone take Linda's cell phone or what? How does anyone know about
her messages?

And the pregnancy test still bothers me with the timeline. You said "she was in Florida" (although
without definite proof) in April and the test was found May 7th. That is not actually 5 to 6 weeks later.
A thought - what dates were the tickets for? I know it seems like I am obscessed with this information
but I have to have it resolved in my own mind as to what happened. I do not know Linda and have
never talked with her or corresponded with her. As a viewer I did like her and thought more of


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-17 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 8 2 of 8

her than I did of Danny. I was not impressed with him. To be honest, I was dismayed by the divorce
and just believed what Danny was saying until he remarried and then I had some questions. I kept it all
to myself until the law suit surfaced and now I have to know what is actually going on.

Thank you again for trying to help me see the whole picture. Bless you.

*****

QUOTE(Walt Thompson)
We have been accused falsely. That was OK until it began to seriously impact
the ministry. When, in spite of everything we knew how to do, our donors started
holding back their gifts, we grinned and bore it. When, however, we discovered
that the leadership of the church had cautioned its workers to cool it and refrain
from involvement with 3abn until "it resolved its problems," we concluded it was
time to do something. I spoke with Mark at the GC seeking help. He told me over
and over again that the leadership of the church could not and would not get
involved in our disputes. He suggested, as others had and as we had considered,
to request help from ASI. We sent a request to ASI. After some time and a
number of meetings of their exec. committee, they finally agreed to establish a
commission to respond to our request.
As far as seeking non-Adventist attorneys and going to the courts, I might site
the example of the Apostle Paul, who wrote the portion of First Corinthians
6:5-7, about the courts, but himself finally appealed to Ceasar because he was
unable to work things out with his one people. I quote from Acts of the Apostles,
" "When Festus was come into the province, after three days he ascended from
Caesarea to Jerusalem. Then the high priest and the chief of the Jews informed
him against Paul, and besought him, and desired favor against him, that he
would send for him to Jerusalem." In making this request they purposed to
waylay Paul along the road to Jerusalem and murder him. But Festus had a high
sense of the responsibility of his position, and courteously declined to send for
Paul. "It is not the manner of the Romans," he declared, "to deliver any man to
die, before that he which is accused have the accusers face to face, and have
license to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him." He stated
that "he himself would depart shortly" for Caesarea. "Let them there . . . which
among you are able, go down with me, and accuse this man, if there be any
wickedness in him."

On 7/7/07, Walt Thompson wrote:

Thanks *****,

I am sorry for pushing you a little, but you need to understand that I do not know you or anything about you or
your motives, etc. I am generally very trusting of people, but my experiences the past couple years on the
Internet have made me very skiddish. People who write with the most innocent appearing questions have too
often taken my responses, edited them, misapplied them, and done all sorts of unimaginable things to
make them say just the opposite of the intent to use them against the ministry. Just one example, and
certainly not the most significant one! I wrote an e mail to Johann T, our former representative in Europe, and
a friend of Linda. In it I refuted a charge that we had fired Linda on the basis of adultery. In my response I


(Text Box comment +)
Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-17 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 3 of 8 3 of 8

stated that we did not fire her because of adultery, but for defiance of board orders. About a year later Linda
used this statement as proof, and published on her web site that I had never accused her of adultery, thus
using my statement to indicate I believed she was innocent.

*****, I agree that people ought to have questions, and ought to be able to ask questions. I still try to provide
substantial answers to those who ask, but less than a month ago, information that I had stated in private
appeared in public with a different message than what I had stated.

As regards to the pregnancy test, the same things are true. If I were to tell you all of the things I know or
suspect, it is possible for you, or someone you share it with, to take the info., misapply it, or deny it, post it on
the Internet and accuse me of making scandalous statements. This is not paranoia, but reality. It is one thing
to have written and signed statements defending one's position, but more difficult when evidence is
circumstantial, involves personal witnesses, etc., that can be denied or modified. Then it becomes little more
than a free for all. While much of the information we have is solid, a significant amount is circumstantial
and/or available from witnesses.

I had not checked the timing of when the pregnance test was found. I didn't think it mattered for the sake of
the discussion. In checking back, the info I have is that it was in mid May, 5 or 6 weeks after the suspected
trip to Florida, a trip that we believe occured based upon several bits of information - a message left on a cell
phone by her mother, a plane ticket, and the inability to contact her during that time. Furthermore, plans for
another trip to Florida were overheard on the day the test was found. A joke! Not likely.

I hope this is helpful. Since this is sensitive information, for the reasons sighted above, I trust you will
use this information discretly.

Sincerely in Jesus' precious name,

Walter Thompson MD

----- Original Message -----

From:
To: Walt Thompson
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: 3abn

Dear Walt Thompson,

The reason for my questions is simply I am trying to determine truth in this whole difficult situation.
As a viewer and supporter of 3ABN I need to know what is real and what is not. In your first
e-mail to me you indicated that some individuals were making "false allegations" and spreading
these lies on the internet. How else can I determine what is truth but to ask for answers from the
people who should know first hand, namely you and the management at 3ABN.

This is the very reason I came to you to find out about the pregnancy test. Being a nurse, I
still have a difficult time understanding how the pregnancy test is even relevent when Linda was
not with the doctor during the months prior to finding the test (May 7). I heard Linda bought
the test as a joke or prank to rile up Danny. A very stupid idea in my opinion but it sounds
believable.

I appreciate you trying to answer my questions. If you think about it, you will agree that
more people should be interested in researching facts and asking questions when something just


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-17 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 4 of 8 4 of 8


(Text Box comment +)
(Text Box comment +)
does not add up for the simple reason that they will not be convinced of lies and false allegations
about anyone.
Truth can stand the test of close scrutiny. God bless.
*****


On 7/6/07, Walt Thompson wrote:


Dear *****,

You are correct in concluding the that the pregnancy test was found earlier in the month. Sorry, but I am
not sure of the significance of the time line. Before expanding on this, I would be interested in knowing
the reason for your inquiry. Is this simple curiosity, or is there something more to it.

Sincerely in Jesus' name,

Walter Thompson MD

----- Original Message -----

From:
To: Walt Thompson
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 4:46 AM
Subject: Re: 3abn


Dear Walt Thompson.

Thank you for your attempt to give me a time-line but something is not quite right. First of all, I
do not know anything about a watch and I may have things confused but I thought the
pregnancy test was found around the first week in May, not the end of May.

I am sure you can provide some clarification.

*****

On 7/3/07, Walt Thompson wrote:

Dear *****,

 I am not sure that I understand your question, but let me try to respond. Linda was in Norway in
February. While there they made plans for her to return in June for a prolonged vacation together.
We also have evidence that they planned to meet in Florida together (in April I believe). We believe
that happened, but do not have physical proof that it took place. We do know that she had tickets to
go and that her mother believed she was there. There is no question but that they were together in
late May about the time of Campmeeting. It was about that time when the pregnancy test was
discovered and the watch was found.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-17 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 5 of 8 5 of 8

You are free to share the information I give to you, but please do not circulate my e mails.
Thanks.

God bless,

Walter Thompson MD

----- Original Message -----

From:

To: Walt Thompson

Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 11:27 AM

Subject: Re: 3abn

Dear Walt Thompson,

Thank you for your responses to my earlier questions.

There is one thing that came up in a conversation with another interested 3abn supporter.
What is the scoop on the pregnancy test? I have some difficulty understanding how the
test could have been found 13 weeks after Linda left Norway. Maybe you have some
additional information on that subject.

*****

On 6/19/07, Walt Thompson <walttmd@wi.rr.com > wrote:

Dear *****,

Thank you for your e mail of June 17 requesting information. We appreciate hearing from our
viewers and supporters. Please permit me to respond to your concern.

About 9 months ago, e mails, Internet posts, personal letters, etc. began circulating around the
world accusing 3abn and its people of all manner of false allegations. Initially, we attempted to
respond to some of the questions being asked and allegations being made. The things we
said were then often twisted, edited, or otherwise given a different meaning, then posted on
the Internet for the world to read. We plead with them to stop, for even if any of the allegations
were true (which they were not), it was not right to destroy people in such a public way without
knowing all of the facts. In time, we realized we needed to do something, and after some
discussions with some in Church leadership and meeting as a board, requested ASI to help
us out. In response, after some discussion, they agreed to set up a commission to respond to
our request. So as to credibly fulfill our request it would be necessary to hear both sides of the
story. Unfortunately, Linda and those she had chosen to represent her were unwilling to abide
by the procedure established by ASI, and hence made it impossible for ASI to arrive at an
opinion. Since 3abn is a supporting ministry of the Church, leadership of the church rightfully
stated that they had no authority to interfere with 3abn activities - nor were they willing to hear
our side of the story. Where else does one go for help? When we could find no other options
by which to have our case heard so as to reassure our viewers and supporters, and when the
leadership of the Church began to curtail their people from participating with 3abn, we believed
we must do something. But what?

Let me say again at this point. 3ABN has committed no crime or immorality, quite contrary to


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-17 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 6 of 8 6 of 8

the terrible things being said about us. From the beginning of this ministry, we have had as a
primary objective to do things right and above board. We believe we have upheld that standard.

None of us were concerned about our own persons, and would not have considered a law suit
to defend ourselves. We have dedicated ourselves to the cause of Christ, and know that one
must sometimes pay a price for doing so. But when the criticism began to seriously affect the
ministry, and limit its ability to perform the task God has commissioned us to do, we believed it
was time to act on His behalf. Yes, we might have continued to pray and expect God to yet
bring us through the crisis. But as I read the record of the Bible, though God has always been
the One who goes before His people into battle, He has often insisted that they also have a
role to play. Gideon is just one example of many.

As far as seeking non-Adventist attorneys and going to the courts, I might site the example of
the Apostle Paul, who wrote the portion of First Corinthians 6:5-7, about the courts, but himself
finally appealed to Ceasar because he was unable to work things out with his own people. I
quote from Acts of the Apostles, " "When Festus was come into the province, after three days
he ascended from Caesarea to Jerusalem. Then the high priest and the chief of the Jews
informed him against Paul, and besought him, and desired favor against him, that he would
send for him to Jerusalem." In making this request they purposed to waylay Paul along the
road to Jerusalem and murder him. But Festus had a high sense of the responsibility of his
position, and courteously declined to send for Paul. "It is not the manner of the Romans," he
declared, "to deliver any man to die, before that he which is accused have the accusers face to
face, and have license to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him." He stated
that "he himself would depart shortly" for Caesarea. "Let them there . . . which among you are
able, go down with me, and accuse this man, if there be any wickedness in him."

429

 {AA 428.1}

 This was not what the Jews wanted. They had not forgotten their former defeat at Caesarea.
In contrast with the calm bearing and forcible arguments of the apostle, their own malignant
spirit and baseless accusations would appear in the worst possible light. Again they urged
that Paul be brought to Jerusalem for trial, but Festus held firmly to his purpose of giving Paul
a fair trial at Caesarea. God in His providence controlled the decision of Festus, that the life of
the apostle might be lengthened. {AA 429.1}

 Their purposes defeated, the Jewish leaders at once prepared to witness against Paul at
the court of the procurator. Upon returning to Caesarea, after a few days' sojourn at Jerusalem,
Festus "the next day sitting on the judgment seat commanded Paul to be brought." "The Jews
which came down from Jerusalem stood round about, and laid many and grievous complaints
against Paul, which they could not prove." Being on this occasion without a lawyer, the Jews
preferred their charges themselves. As the trial proceeded, the accused with calmness and
candor clearly showed the falsity of their statements. {AA 429.2}

 Festus discerned that the question in dispute related wholly to Jewish doctrines, and that,
rightly understood, there was nothing in the charges against Paul, could they be proved, that
would render him subject to sentence of death, or even to imprisonment. Yet he saw clearly
the storm of rage that would be created if Paul were not condemned or delivered into their
hands. And so, "willing to do the Jews a pleasure," Festus turned to Paul, and asked if he

430
was willing to go to Jerusalem under his protection, to be tried by the Sanhedrin. {AA 429.3}

The apostle knew that he could not look for justice from the people who by their crimes were
bringing down upon themselves the wrath of God. He knew that, like the prophet Elijah, he
would be safer among the heathen than with those who had rejected light from heaven and
hardened their hearts against the gospel. Weary of strife, his active spirit could ill endure the
repeated delays and wearing suspense of his trial and imprisonment. He therefore decided to
exercise his privilege, as a Roman citizen, of appealing to Caesar. {AA 430.1}

 In answer to the governor's question, Paul said: "I stand at Caesar's judgment seat, where I
ought to be judged: to the Jews have I done no wrong, as thou very well knowest. For if I be an
offender, or have committed anything worthy of death, I refuse not to die: but if there be none of
these things whereof these accuse me, no man may deliver me unto them. I appeal unto


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-17 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 7 of 8 7 of 8

Caesar ." {AA 430.2}

 Festus knew nothing of the conspiracies of the Jews to murder Paul, and he was surprised
at this appeal to Caesar. However, the words of the apostle put a stop to the proceedings of
the court. "Festus, when he had conferred with the council, answered, Hast thou appealed
unto Caesar? unto Caesar shalt thou go." {AA 430.3}

Thus it was that once more, because of hatred born of bigotry and self-righteousness, a
servant of God was driven to turn for protection to the heathen. It was this same hatred that
forced the prophet Elijah to flee for succor to the widow

431
of Sarepta; and that forced the heralds of the gospel to turn from the Jews to proclaim their
message to the Gentiles. And this hatred the people of God living in this age have yet to meet.
Among many of the professing followers of Christ there is the same pride, formalism, and
selfishness, the same spirit of oppression, that held so large a place in the Jewish heart. In
the future, men claiming to be Christ's representatives will take a course similar to that
followed by the priests and rulers in their treatment of Christ and the apostles. In the great
crisis through which they are soon to pass, the faithful servants of God will encounter the
same hardness of heart, the same cruel determination, the same unyielding hatred. {AA
430.4} (Witness the posts on the Internet and other places!) All who in that evil day would
fearlessly serve God according to the dictates of conscience, will need courage, firmness, and
a knowledge of God and His word; for those who are true to God will be persecuted, their
motives will be impugned, their best efforts misinterpreted, and their names cast out as evil.
Satan will work with all his deceptive power to influence the heart and becloud the
understanding, to make evil appear good, and good evil. The stronger and purer the faith of
God's people, and the firmer their determination to obey Him, the more fiercely will Satan strive
to stir up against them the rage of those who, while claiming to be righteous, trample upon the
law of God. It will require the firmest trust, the most heroic purpose, to hold fast the faith once
delivered to the saints. {AA 431.1}

This statement describes the vicious attacks against 3abn and its people exactly. Those
making the attacks never came to us seeking truth, but rather, came to us with false
accusations challenging us to prove them wrong in the "court" of public opinion where no oath
requires truth to be told.

This was not an easy decision for Danny or I. I expect the same is true for the other members
of the board that voted to move foreword with the suit. You may consider it a lack of faith!
Perhaps! But I don't think so. For we earnestly sought the guidance of God before signing
anything.

Some might call it paranoia, but I believe the devil does not like what he sees happening with
this ministry. Doors continue to open for the proclamation fo the gospel. The Ten
Commandment weekend has been great, teaching our viewers all around the world about the
God of love behind the Commandments. I firmly believe God will see us through these difficult
times, but we too must have a part to play.

This is not about revenge. It is not about hurting anyone. It is all, and only about fighting
for a ministry our Lord has raised up to proclaim the Three Angels Messages to the
world. We believe He is leading, just as He lead Paul and Elijah and those of the past
who faced similar opposition.

We cherish your comments and prayers. We truly want to do what is right. I cannot let the
cause of God be victimized without responding in my Lord's defense. Yes, I know He doesn't
need my defense, but I owe it to Him for His goodness to me.

While I do not equate the Church Manual with EGW or the Bible, I do think that God does guide
the Church.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-17 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 8 of 8 8 of 8
Logged

Fran

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 572
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2008, 09:38:37 PM »


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-17 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 8 of 8 8 of 8

The current CHRUCH MANUAL clearly states that there are situations where the church has
neither the authority nor the ability to resolve disputes, and in such cases recourse is only to
the civil authorities.

The CHRUCH MANUAL also states that the church should not be diverted from its mission to
preach the gospel to become a civil magistrate.

Thanks again for expressing your concerns. I would be happy to discuss this further if you have
further comments or questions.

Sincerely in Jesus' precious name,
Walter Thompson MD


wife Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-18 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 of 2
Ex. Q
Subject: wife
From: "Danny Shelton"
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 06:49:46 -0500
To: aaedta@...
Doctor you must be getting very anxious as my wife and I are getting professional counsiling that will
clearly show your mind contro tactics that you have used on her. Some one very intelligent has help me
see you cult like methods, of many long hours of conversations with my wife, placing in her mind that you
are her only hope for her son, even sending pictures, which I am using as evidence against you, of your
place with a sign that says PARADISE. Obviously everyone wants to go to paradise. We on to a number
of your tricks for trying to steal another man's wife. No wonder you told Brenda that my wife must
"destroy" her computer!
(Text Box comment +)
I have learned why you had to call that Friday, even though you promised the pastor you would never
again call. You had to see how much contro you still had with her and when she talked with you against
all her promises you thought she would never tell and expose you.
There is one problem that you never thought about, too many people are praying for her and this ministry,
you will never win, what you set out to accomplish, The Holy Spirit is greater than the powers of
darkness. You made too many bad mistakes in this process including but not least, of inviting another
man's wife to live with you in your private condo in Florida, for a vacation.
My wife admitted to me yesterday that Brenda was never in the picture when you first asked her to go
on vacation and live with you while there. I know the Lord is working on her because she volunteerly told
me that she would never have invited herself to your place, even though that's the picture you tried to
paint to Pastor John.
She told me how you invited her alone, and no one else, then went to Africa for one week or so. She
then told me that when she called you to take you up on your offer, you said you didn't remember ever
inviting her there but it she wanted to go you would be happy to meet her there. Any even asked her if
this process was ok in America that she, a married woman live with you alone while there, as though sin
is different by national bounderies! The problem is she said she didn't even no you had a condo, until you
told her about it while inviting her to live with you.
I have kept records of all of these facts that she has confessed too. I know this must be shocking to you
as you thought you had more control of her than that, but every day there is no contact between the two
of you she is seeing more light as to your intentions, to covet and steal her from me.
As I told you before, all the facts after counseling is over and you are clearly exposed in her mind, I
intend for your church leaders through out Norway to learn the real person that you really are.
I've done Matthew 18. I've gone to you at no avail. Next I went to Pastor John, and you lied to him and
told him you would never call again, now, unless you apologize to my wife and me, not on the phone, but
email or letter, I will promise you that I will take this to the church before long. You will not stay in your
coveted position as elder in the SDA church.
If you mail a genuine confession that you knowing did wrong concerning inviting my wife to live with you
in florida and all the other things we have dicussed, we will not take this to your church in Norway and
elsewhere. I have too many professional people now including my board members who have talked to my
wife and next week an unbiased, professional counseler, that does not know either of us, but who
specializes in getting to the bottom of mind control issues.


wife Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-18 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 2 2 of 2 Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-18 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 2 2 of 2

Your choice is to apologize now to us privately, or apologize and try to deny all the creditable people such
as pastor John, my board members, who will make a signed statement, and I believe this new
professional counsiler that we are seeing next week, to your conference.
I don't want a generic apology that says something like, "If I've offended you, I'm sorry." I've heard
those before.
You will either answer to my wife and I or you will answer all the charges to your conference. Not
charges of a jealous husband, but charges of Christian pastors and counsilers who stand in mine and my
wife's corner.
The choice is yours.

I know your next move, will be a desperate attempt to contact my wife again, to try to get control again,
where you are losing it fast. She is expecting this as we have told her that you are desparate, that she is
beginning to tell all and you have to have it stopped. We know you try to use Johann and Irmgard to say
positive things to her about you too, but we're on to that also!

It's occurred to me and the people I've been talking to, that it would be interesting to see how many
woman over the last 20 or 30 years that you have been involved with. I even wonder if there has been
previous charges from them that you have been able to sweep under the rug. I do believe this time that
the rug is being pulled out from under YOU!


Emailing: 8207 Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-19 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1 1 of 1
Ex. R
Subject: Emailing: 8207
From: "Danny Shelton"
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:11:19 -0500
To: aaedta@...
At best, this represents, what you have done. Today is the day we start contacting your church leaders.

8207.url
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Encoding: base64

Spiritual AdulteryCase 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-20 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 of 2

Ex.
S


Ads by Google

Intimacy in Marriage Healing Spirit Christian Marriage Healing Prayer


Spiritual Adultery

In my work as a counselor-of-clergy, one of the most baffling questions is: why do so many clergy and
people-helpers commit adultery?

I'm writing a major paper on this issue, which will be posted in due course: together with another article
on 'Sex and Singles'...

Where do we start? Here's one place: the need of every human being for intimacy (Genesis 2:18), which
people-helpers/clergy are involved in every working day. God has created us with a deep need to be loved
when we are 'known'. Spiritual and emotional wholeness happens when the dynamic of
confession/forgiveness occurs. God's unconditional love is incarnated when another human being accepts
us when they know the worst about us...

But in our world children and adults are not loved unconditionally. Parents, teachers/authority figures
and peers 'loved' us to the degree that we are 'good' or clever or conform or satisfy other criteria for
acceptance. And because most men were not properly initiated into manhood by their fathers (mothers
can't do that: ask for my article on that) and most women were not nurtured adequately by their fathers
(I have something on that too), we have in our 'bent world' an increasing number of adults living with a
mild-to-severe love-deficit.

If I marry a wife to find a nurturing mother, or a husband to find a nurturing father, all sorts of
codependent behaviours develop. I'm supposed to marry a _mate_, not someone whose main function is
to carry the baggage of unmet emotional needs I've brought from my childhood.

Now people-helpers/clergy are very vulnerable at this point. A client/parishioner may project their
unmet 'love-deficit' needs into the counseling relationship. 'No one has ever understood me like you do' is
a common come-on. The counselor is burnt out, tired, emotionally drained, frustrated in their marriage
or whatever, and gets hooked. They share with the client feelings which don't belong in this context and
find comfort and refreshment in this relationship. One thing leads to another, and as John Sandford says
in his quite brilliant book 'Why Some Christians Commit Adultery' (Tulsa, OK: Victory House, 1989),
'the first and greatest cause of _sexual_ adultery, among well-meaning Christians, is _spiritual_
adultery [which happens when] married persons share with someone else what ought to have been
shared first or only with their own spouses' (p.7).

The classical wisdom here:

1. Spiritual adultery is always (at first) unintentional.
2. When persisted in, it leads inevitably to full physical adultery.
3. So: don't become isolated, particularly from your spouse; be careful when you keenly anticipate an
appointment with someone or invent even 'innocent' excuses to spend inappropriate amounts of private
time with that person; listen to the warnings of others; confess to a spiritual director or supervisor; join a
small group where you can be accountable; be willing not to see the person in question in private - ever
again; and ask for someone with spiritual discernment to pray for a 'separation' or 'loosing' of spirits particularly
if it led to sexual adultery (see 1 Cor. 6:15-20). Finally: deal with the roots of your own
dysfunction.
http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/8207.htm


Spiritual AdulteryCase 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-20 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 2 2 of 2

top of page

© John Mark Ministries. Articles may be reproduced in any medium, without applying for permission
(provided they are unedited, and retain the original author/copyright information - and perhaps a
reference to this website :-)!


http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/8207.htm 9/2/2008 11:49 AM


Fw: Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-21 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 1 1 of 1
Ex. T
Subject: Fw:
From: "Danny Shelton"
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:52:06 -0500
To: aaedta@...
----- Original Message -----
From: Danny Shelton
To: Johann Thorvaldsson
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 10:10 PM
Hi Johann & Irmgard,
I just want to wish you a very happy Sabbath. My love & prayers are with you.
Dan brought a book home today which is entitled "Why Some Christians commmit Adultery." I read the
first couple of chapters which speak of what they term as "spiritual adultery." Apparently, this is
something which satan uses to bring leaders and Christians down. This is speaking about relationships
between well-meaning brothers and sisters in Christ. They have wonderful spiritually, uplifting
conversations but as the relationships progress satan gets involved and it heads a wrong direction.
Unfortunately, as I was reading the chapters I could see myself in them. My relationship with the doctor
began as what appeared to be a good thing, but obviously the fruit of this relationship has brought about
nothing but bad fruit. Had this relationship really been built on the Lord it would have brought about good
fruit instead of all the heartache and hurt that has resulted...and who knows if more time was put into the
relationship, perhaps it could have resulted in physical a
dultery...which would have been devastating.
I've complained to you about my irate husband...and he admits that he has not done everything right. But
in his heart he was desperately trying to save me from making a terrible mistake. And I see his heart in
this now. We are, with God's help trying to put the marriage back together, as well as the ministry.
Please pray for us.
It's my prayer that peace and prosperity will come back to 3ABN as a result of our desire to recommit
ourselves to the Lord. God bless you!
Linda S.


.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-22 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 of 2

Ex.
U


-----Original Message----From:
Danny Shelton
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 2:09 PM
To: Matthews, Temple Gregory
Subject: RE:

Gregory,

I'd like to go through this letter and clear up some things.

1. You say in paragraph 5 that there is some stuff being said, apparently publicly, by both sides that is
inappropriate and possibly half-truths. Please tell me what you have seen and know for a fact is
inappropriate
and possibly half truths printed by 3ABN about Linda. That's a big general statement but I would like to see
the facts.

2. The questions you have about the legal court case I will let Nick answer.
3.Who has accused Linda of Spiritual Adultery? Did I? if so show me. This is what seems to be the
problem. People want to believe what they read. Linda and Johann say that she's accused of spiritual
adultery, but show me where you got that info from me. In fact I don't know of any board member making
the statement publicly.

4 Linda has had much counseling. Many hours of it by professionals. Again I don't know how you can
make your mind up on this one without knowing the details.

5. John Lomacang is a licensed marriage counselor. The Nazarene marriage counseling couple that Linda
set up to counsel us are both licensed marriage counselors. Linda and I had probably at least 3-4 sessions
with John L. lasting anywhere from 5-8 hours per session. He counseled both of us on the phone for long
period of time over two or three month.
Linda did not like his counsel. She talked to her sister and she recommended this very well known couple
that are Nazarene that had saved her marriage. They spent 8 hours counseling with us. Some times
privately and some time together. After 8 hours of counseling us they told Linda that this relationship she
had developed with this Dr. had to stop. They told her she was in violation of her marriage vows where she
promised to forsake all others for her husband. They told her that if she didn't stop this relationship that
they were sure it would cost her marriage and ministry.

She promised to brake off all contacts, yet phone records show that even though she first denied calling
him after this counseling session that she had indeed called and talked to him for up to 4 hrs almost every
day for the next week, when confronted by me.

These call continued day after day week after week. I asked her in front of Walt Thompson and Pastor John
how she could look me straight in the eye and lie when I asked her if she had any contact with this man.
She said that he told her that since everyone became so upset with her for talking to him that it was ok
just to deny any contact. She also said in front of witnesses that neither she or he ever intended to break
off their relationship. I could go on and on about this kind of behavior on her part but for now I've said
enough.

Mark Finley spent several hours on the phone with Linda trying to help her to see the sin in this
relationship and the consequence involved if it didn't stop. He wanted to talk more, but since he didn't agree
with her she cut him off. Kay Kuzma only talked to her once even though the board brought her in to
counsel with Linda. But when Linda saw that Kay would not be swayed her way she cut off all ties to kay.


Case 4:07-cv-40098-FDS Document 100-22 Filed 09/08/2008 Page 2 of 2 2 of 2

.


.


Kay and her husband Jan came to our house to counsel with Linda, but Linda refused to let them in. I
could go on about more counseling but that's enough for that too. Like John Lomacang said, The principal
behind this relationship is easily proved from scripture that it is wrong, but Linda would not listen.

6. You say that you are not convinced that Linda had an inappropriate relationship with another man, but
where are you getting your info. If you're married I could guarantee that if your wife was doing all that I know
my wife was doing, you would consider it inappropriate. Again you are making decision based on what?
Definitely not fact.
Mark Finley who does know the facts and as one I happen to respect tremendously, told me that God
doesn't expect any man to stay in that kind of marriage. He said, after many weeks and many hours of fact
finding, "Danny, I know I could never live in that situation". Mark Finley like you and I knows the difference
between spiritual adultery and physical adultery. We have the facts therefore we can make up our mind
based on that. You haven't really had any facts so I don't know how you could believe one way or the other.

The bible says there is wisdom in the multitude of counselors. I have done that. So has Linda, but she has
refused to listen. All couselors and board members unanimously agreed this relationship was sin, it was
wrong and therefore must stop.

7. In your comments marked # 9, I hear you saying that you have sometimes disagreed with what I have
said, but you have not really heard me say anything, you are assuming things that Linda and Johann say
that I said. Like the example of Spiritual Adultery.
8. I have something that I am almost through writing that I would like for you to post if you want to. I'll email
it when I'm done. Hopefully, tomorrow or Friday.


Logged

Fran

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 572
Re: Doc 100 and Exhibits
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2008, 09:42:52 PM »

Admin;

That is document 100 with ehibits.  Break it up if you desire.  Pin it and refer to it, whatever.  Here it is.

Now, I really have to go to bed.  Let the discussions begin.
Logged

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2008, 05:10:33 AM »

That discussion has begun at 3abnttalk. Bonnie has posted this:

Fran,
Over the years reading your posts I have never given it a thought that I would have to weigh carefully something you had said to determine if you were being truthful. I have disagreed as I am sure you did with me. But never as in if deceit were involved . Going over some of the posts prior to my banishment again :lol: I am at a loss as to what I see from you and a couple of others that I have had respect for over the years. Reading you recent questions/comments I have this sneaking suspicion one of us resides on another planet.
You(general) can not have been an active member of that forum and not be aware there is dishonesty on many levels.Let's begin with Edward.

I cannot go back and retrieve them now but everyone can certainly read . There are five pages of posts,only two I could see tin a quick scan might have passed for what others term respectful discussion. Those he was responding to made him sick,were compared to stupid,ignorant rednecks that could barely write their name in the sand with a stick. While I cannot prove you read the posts I am certain you did. Where was your response to this rude,nasty oaf?? Missing as I recall. Now you ask....
3. MY/Our personal attacks against others should be dealt with immediately.
Can it be done?
I watched as each of the admin team read this man's garbage. Most passed their scrutiny,isn't that odd that no one knew what respectful discussion meant. Yet you could almost see the drooling at the mouth of snoopy when she got to yell "Inappropriate" at any and all that did not agree with Gailon the avenger and Slippery Bob. This has been over and over.

It is obvious and something you simply cannot defend that Bob has been less than straight forward. Go back to his farce of an interview. Artiste the dutiful little servant of Bob just stumbles across this "Explosive New Charges"video complete with phony interview . Everyone had to have known exactly what a farce this was and yet some went WOW. Bob is a fake and worse. When Bob got caught in a little snafu,no problem, the rest of the dummies couldn't hope to understand him as he was just to precise.He is the boy that wants proof,yet when he says something about another and is asked for that proof,poof,he remembered it was confidential. Second or third hand almost gospel wasn't it? These are just little things as I do not have acess to the rest. Bob did not have to offer anything.
You need to take as close a look if not closer at Bob than you do at DS. You are not placing your credibilty in DS hands. You are with Bob ,Gailon and Johann.
Bob is so adament about his first amendment rights that he believes that allows him to say anything he chooses. Within limitation it does,but gives others the same rights. Only he depends on donations of others to protect whatever garbage he spews. Bob would do far better worrying about his rights and obligation as a husband and father. Part of that might involve a regular job to at least help support his family. Maybe he should have had more concern over his daughter's continuing education. Unless she found another way it seems Bob's devotion to sin sleuthing took priority. . Maybe he is waiting for his television debut or better yet the centerfold of the National Enquirer.

Bob's barely disguised presence as SDA minister.His disgusting game of I Spy Sin.

The one that did surprise me was Johann. Based solely on his pastoral credentials it never occurred to me that he would lie. The lies he told should have been an embarrassment to all of you. When he could not answer a couple of simple questions as to his presence at the DR's house it could not be denied. It was so painfully obvious you had to deliberately look the other way to not see it. HIs latest was far more minor but showed a pastor willing to lie over the smallest of issues. Then he tries to pass it off as a joke and compounds the first lie by implication.
Johann plays around with the truth as freely as Slippery Bob

This only works as long as what is shared is honest......5. Can I/we share more with others to bring this thing to an end.

But the way this works is not quite as you have written it
If so, all would be able to read AdventTalk 3ABN Topics and read evidence and discussion about the facts against Danny and 3ABN. 3ABNTalk could present facts showing evidence against our facts presented. Having opposing views gets in the way of truth being presented. God is not the author of confusion. Any posting to the contrary should be weeded out early and told to go post on 3ABNTalk. They too need an outlet for their opinions of Danny's and 3ABN facts.

Freedom of Speech First Amendment means different things to Bob and Gailon and those that follow their footsteps. It is very important to them to be able to say any and everything they want,however they strongarm their way trying to control what is said on other forums.



I don't think it is to difficult to see the suggestion below for what it is. If Bob is caught with a brand new "Explosive Charges" interview are we all to be positive about his deception. Tha's right any that would not play the pretend game with Bob wouldn't be allowed. That might work quite well
Making sure the past detractors will not be ever again allowed in 3ABN topics Gailon the Avenger and Slippery Bob have a clear field to lead their ever faithful troops.

Is it possible to do this? To accept anyone in all other forums, but only positive discussions in 3ABN threads regarding discussion of the facts as presented through court documents and new facts as presented by us or other witnesses. What ever happens. we must make sure none of the past detractors are ever again be allowed in 3ABN Topics. We need 3ABN Topics to be Public, but posting has to be more selective!-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Bob,Gailon and Johann have only themselves to blame for many either not believing them at this point or have concluded the accuser is as dirty as the accused so duke it out.

I personally don't believe the statement by 3ABN as to why they wanted out of the lawsuit. I am sure there were embarrassing facts they did not want out. But I don't see Bob and gailon as being the high and mighty cleanse the sin from the camp duo.


God has been very busy. The story is being told, but is anyone reading it? It may be but probably with adifferent outcome than you would like.
Bob has slipped around the truth to many times,using reasons a bright ten year old would laugh at. Johann is doing quite well in showing who he is. Gailon makes little attempt to hide who he is
Logged

Artiste

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Posts: 3036
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2008, 06:17:37 AM »

Here is the later response of Dr. Arild Abrahamsen to the situation addressed in the above e-mails:

Quote
June 20, 2006


Greetings from Norway;

My name is Dr. Arild Abrahamsen. I live in Svindal, Norway. I have been a medical doctor for more than 35 years. I am a member of the Moss SDA Church. I've been the Sabbath School Superintendent for 14 years and the head elder for 4 years, which position I am presently serving. I am the Norwegian
doctor who has been slandered by Dr. Walt Thompson, chairman of the board of 3ABN, Danny Shelton, John Lomacang and others.

Since I have observed the situation and the slander only getting worse, I feel it best to share my experience. I share my personal experience, what I have seen and heard. Much of this information has been verified by other sources, which include emails, letters and the personal experiences of others. I share my experience not to attack any ndividual or organization, but to bring the truth of this situation to the surface.

I have been shocked to observe the events of the last two years. I have made no public statement until now. I had hoped things would resolve themselves.

I visited Johann and Irmgard Thorvaldsson at 3ABN the last week of 2003. The purpose of the trip was to see them and visit the ministry, which I personally had been supporting for some time. I had never been to 3ABN previously, nor had I met the Shelton's. During this visit I discovered from the Thorvaldsson's that Linda Shelton's son, Nathan, was in a dangerous state of health because of an addiction to drugs and working in coalmines. I offered to see him. This visit resulted in an invitation for Nathan to come to Norway for treatments. Nathan came to Norway around January 20, 2004 along with his friend, Dava Vice. Linda came for a 3-½ day visit to support her son, the first week of February together with Brenda Walsh. This was the last time I saw Linda until the weekend she was fired.

I had a chance to visit with Nathan regularly. I learned from my conversations with Nathan that the roots of his drug problems were the relationships with his father and stepfather. Specifically he told me that Danny had turned his back on him. I shared this information with his mother
on the phone. She told me that Danny said he had no responsibility towards Nathan since he was a product of her first marriage, so she felt she had to do what she could to help her son. There was nothing unusual in the
occasional phone reports I gave Nathan's mother while he was in Norway. After Nathan returned home, I asked Linda to keep me updated on Nathan's progress.

I was shocked to discover in early March of 2004 that Danny was threatening to get Linda fired from 3ABN because of some conversations on the phone. In fact, she was threatened immediately with divorce. By this time Nathan had started with drugs again and Linda was seeking advice. I was also shocked to discover that Brenda had started circulating untrue statements as well. (Was it because Danny had admitted to some emotional involvement with Brenda?) I
talked to Danny one time on the phone and found him to be unreasonable, unbalanced and very difficult to communicate with. Johann Thorvaldsson, a
retired pastor of the SDA Church of 50 years, also was in communication with Danny, both by phone and email. We talked together and shared the same opinion that Danny was acting completely irrational and unreasonable towards his wife. It appeared he was attempting to leave an email trail filled with untruths to verify a position at a later time. The decision was made to stop the communication by phone with Linda.

Some weeks went by. Johann and Irmgard were getting treatments at my clinic and staying in my home during the Easter week in April, so I discovered from
them that the situation was not improving for Linda. She was being harassed, threatened, and unreasonable demands by her husband were repeatedly being made to confess things she had not done. By this time, she was also suspended from her job at 3ABN, an order that was issued and enforced by her husband with no Board action. Things were so bad in the home that she found it necessary to go to her daughter's home in Springfield, Illinois for safety and rest on several occasions. Derrell Mundall, who was traveling often for 3ABN, reports rumors of Linda's so-called "affair" were in
SDA churches in April 2004, when Linda was still living with Danny. When he inquired about the source of the rumors, people always pointed to Danny Shelton.

I could see from my 35 years of experience as a physician that Danny was a psychopath. Accusations were directed at me that I had done "mind control" over Linda. (Walt Thompson made the same accusations in his letters.) Linda was accused of sending "secret messages" to me over the television. Danny's emails and communications with Johann were completely crazy, and his reasoning often conflicted with his previous emails. Danny targeted Linda's few inner circle confidants and slandered her to the point that even they backed away from her at this critical time. (Linda's "friends" did not want to lose their television privileges.) Johann and I concluded this was a man who was determined to get rid of his wife. We also concluded that Linda was in danger.

Things eventually progressed from emotional and mental abuse to physical abuse. In the midst of all this harassment Linda asked Danny, 'Why are you treating me like this?' He answered, 'Because I want you to get out.'

Considering the urgency of the situation I allowed the conversations to resume. Linda knew, with her high profile status, that confiding with local people regarding these issues would be very bad for the ministry. I had given counsel to people in difficulty in the past and felt I could be helpful from a distance in this situation. I encouraged Linda to fight for her marriage and ministry many times. This she really did, but she often had to leave her home to find refuge at her daughter's apartment in Springfield, even in the middle of the night because of Danny's behavior. At times like these she was afraid of him. She always returned to her home after a couple of days seeking to try to mend the marriage, but Danny would not allow this.

During the spring of 2004 Danny called my pastor in Norway. Danny tried to get me kicked out as an elder and as a member of the church. My pastor told me about the conversation and he said, "He is mentally sick, he needs professional help."

I find it very disturbing that Walt Thompson defended and continues to defend Danny although he was a witness repeatedly to the emotional and mental abuse that was taking place. At one point he witnessed Danny "trashing" his wife for five hours. I also find it disturbing that John
Lomacang, Linda's former pastor, claims to have counseled extensively with
Danny and Linda when this was far from the truth. During the months of April and May of 2004, when most of the activity was occurring in this situation, Linda NEVER saw John, who was supposed to be her pastor.

Coincidentally the handful of people supporting Danny and defending his actions has gained either power, position, airtime, homes, public endorsement or all of the above.

At one point I had a conversation with Walt Thompson, Chairman of the Board of 3ABN. He asked me to stop all communication with Linda. This had also been communicated to Johann and Irmgard Thorvaldsson and others. I told him
that it was obviously Danny's plan to isolate Linda from everyone at a time when she needed help. To me it was the Christian thing to answer her phone calls and the only humane thing to do for someone who was in crisis. Others did not come to Linda's aid because they did not want to lose
whatever benefit they gained from 3ABN, whether it be a job, programming, promotions, etc. Walt was also the one who phoned Linda when she was suspended from the ministry by her husband. He instructed her that she must not come to the ministry (which she co-founded) without calling ahead of
time because she must be supervised when at 3ABN. Danny broke into a locked bathroom to forcefully take her keys to 3ABN from her. Her hard drive of her computer was confiscated, her contact information taken and even her filing cabinets ravaged, all without any kind of Board action.

Linda was living in an impossible situation. Danny was "in her face" on a regular basis. At times he would say, "If you don't say you're a pathological liar, the marriage and 3ABN is over. If you don't say you're an adulterous woman the marriage and 3ABN is over for you. If you don't say you've given your heart to another man and that he is a demon the marriage and 3ABN is over..... etc." It even reached the point when he demanded her to say "Repeat after me." Johann and I received a couple emails, which said they were from Linda, but they were written by Danny. Linda saw her ministry being destroyed one day at a time. All of this was dehumanizing and terrifying to Linda, who was trying to hold things together. She very much realized what was at stake.

An "investigative committee" was put together by Walt Thompson to look into this situation. They were Walt Thompson, Bill Hulsey, Nick Miller and Kay Kuzma. Danny talked privately at length with each of these people. Linda did not. The committee as a whole never met with Linda at all. In one brief phone conversation with Kay Kuzma she told Linda, "The Board is not interested in you and Danny's personal problems. It is only interested in the fact that the President no longer wants his Vice-President." Johann
Thorvaldsson testifies that he spoke with Kay the following day. She told him she was instructed to get Linda used to the idea of not being at 3ABN anymore and to try to get her involved in another ministry.

It's interesting that at the time Danny accused Linda for speaking on the phone to me, that he was in the practice of speaking regularly with Brenda, Linda's "friend." He also visited often with her in her 3ABN apartment in the night. A worker at 3ABN states that Brenda even went golfing with
Danny behind Linda's back while she was working. As soon as Brenda saw where the tide was turning, she was no longer Linda's friend. She became an accuser as well.

About May 1, 2004 instructions were given to the production staff to wipe Linda's face off of the network by June 1, again with no Board action. All CD's, videos, literature and photos of Linda were stripped out of the Call Center. She was sent a document a few days later specifying that she was
advised to get 30 days of counseling by counselors of their" choice. If she did not agree to this in writing within 24 hours, her employment could be gone. She requested time for an attorney to look at the document. This was refused. Mail was flooding into the network with Linda's name on it. They were all returned to sender. Her scheduled speaking appointments for women's ministries were sabotaged by those in leadership at 3ABN.

Danny told those who worked for Linda that she was a pathological liar and to stay away from her. (He did not want them to hear the other side of the story.) At one point Linda told Walt that Dan was purposefully ruining her
reputation and that she was not willing to be a martyr for 3ABN. Walt's response was "How else are we going to save the ministry?"

Rumors of Linda's so-called "affair" were flying throughout the churches and the General Conference in May of 2004, rumors which were begun by her husband. It was communicated to me that Linda was going to be fired at the Board meeting, which would occur in May, following the 3ABN camp meeting.
Johann and I decided to go to the camp meeting and talk to the Board members and tell them the truth about the situation. When we walked into the 3ABN building we were surrounded by about 10 people. One person stood directly
behind me for the entire service. Walt Thompson and Nick Miller (3ABN's attorney) asked us to leave. We stayed until nearly the end of the service. (At this camp meeting an announcement was made regarding Linda. There were tearful appeals by Danny, which raised a record-breaking amount of money for 3ABN. Danny also claims that an additional two million dollars was raised the year of their divorce.) When Johann and I went to the door, once again we were followed by a small crowd of people. I spoke to Mark Finley about
the situation at length in the parking lot. John Lomacang tried to stop the conversation. He said 'It is not good for you to talk to him alone.' What was he afraid of? He was standing with me when Danny drove up and said that if I returned to camp meeting I would be arrested and thrown in jail. He had already talked to the Sheriff. I decided to not return, as it was Mark Finley's suggestion to avoid the possibility of disrupting the camp meeting for all of the people attending. Linda was staying in her daughter's apartment in Springfield, so we drove there on Saturday to
stay in a hotel for the weekend. During this weekend we were followed by three private investigators all the time. What kind of actions was that, for a man that REALLY wanted to save his marriage?

It is my understanding that a one-sided conversation was illegally taped by Danny towards the end of May. With a mind set on framing his wife, her words have been misconstrued into saying what he wants people to think. She mentions a trip to Las Vegas. He explains to all that she is planning a
rendezvous with "the doctor." In reality for weeks he has offered Linda larger and larger sums of money for her to go to Las Vegas and stay with her mother for six weeks to acquire residency, a requirement for couples that want a quick divorce. For weeks she refused. SHE NEVER WANTED A DIVORCE.

The events of the previous months eventually bring her to the place where she thinks this is maybe what she should do. She knew a separation was necessary. Danny takes her words from the phone call and adds his insinuations. He makes photo copies of her one sided conversation and distributes it. This is his main source of "proof" for his actions and
re-marriage. They call it circumstantial evidence." To further cover their tracks Linda's accusers say that for her sake they don't want to tell "all she has done." They say this so people will accept their statements and imagine the worst. This is slander of the worst kind all coming from
professed Christians.

Johann says he was fired from 3ABN for refusing to attest to something false Danny wanted him to put in writing about Linda. Derrell Mundall, Danny's ex-son-in-law, says he was given the option to resign or be fired because of his actions defending Linda. Others quit their jobs because
they could not support the actions of the leaders. There is one thing many of these people have in common. Anyone who disagrees with Danny is slandered and discredited.

It's interesting that Danny's daughter recently was found to be pregnant out of wedlock. A quick wedding followed when Derrell, (her ex-husband & father of their four children), claims she had no grounds for re-marriage. It's also interesting that nobody asked Derrell about the issue of grounds at all when he was still a resident in Thompsonville. Also another married Shelton
family member had a romantic encounter recently with a married employee of
3ABN. They were instructed to keep it quiet. They did. They all still work at 3ABN, and Melody is featured on the network. Is 3ABN all about standing for principle and values, or standing for those who happen to be in good
graces with the President and the Shelton family ?

Another question that seems to be in the minds of many is "Why was Linda given $240,000 when all claim she was fired for a wrongdoing?" The only reason Linda signed this 3ABN contract was because she needed money to escape from a very irregular, abusive and impossible situation. Danny
forced her to sign not only this contract, but another contract which sold him her half of their joint-owned home the same day.

Linda has suffered much emotional trauma and humiliation from all of this. She still has nightmares about these events. She did not feel ready to face the people of the SDA church for six months after all of this occurred. I encouraged her to begin again. She went for the first time around the end of November of 2004 in Springfield. The people welcomed her. She requested her membership to be transferred out of the Thompsonville church into the
Springfield church in December of 2004. The Springfield pastor had previously worked at 3ABN and knew Linda. He did not believe the rumors and encouraged the church to put her to work. It was a healing time for her to teach Sabbath School and occasionally preach.

In June of 2005 things changed. Pastor Grady was transferred out of the Springfield church, although he wanted to stay, and a pastor from 3ABN was moved into the church. Within two weeks John Stanton met with Linda and told her she would be doing nothing on the platform. She told him that the church really needed the help and she hoped that if she was asked once in two months to teach a Sabbath School class that she would be able to do this. He told her that the orders had come from the conference level. (The Illinois conference President sits on 3ABN's Board and his parents work for 3ABN.) During our visit to the General Conference Session Johann and I visited with this pastor. He told us he
thought Linda was a liar. I TOLD HIM THAT LINDA HAD NEVER BEEN UNFAITHFUL TO HER HUSBAND and that all the rumors from her husband were lies. But this man had TV interests to pursue and he was in close connection with Danny and John Lomacang.

The last week of October 2005, a letter came to Linda from John Lomacang, the pastor of the Thompsonville (3ABN) church. It stated that the church board had voted "to call a church business session to recommend to the church that you be placed under censure." Linda called John to ask him why.
He said it was because she had abandoned her marriage and ministry, which led to her divorce. (This is what Danny refers to as "grounds" to re-marry.) Linda planned to address the church business meeting. She wrote to Danny requesting a release from the restrictions of the contract she signed so she could openly share her side of the story. Danny denied this request. Because of this she felt forced to drop her membership there and then join another SDA church. This decision was made after much counsel with several SDA's. It's interesting that this recommendation for censure came almost 18 months after the fact. (Which kind of practice is this? Special for USA?) It's also
interesting that all of this occurred while Danny was trying to gather evidence against Linda so he could re-marry.

Danny Shelton and the leadership of 3ABN are responsible for using the ministry of 3ABN to bring character assassination to Linda and others. In Linda's case, television and radio announcements were made denouncing her character. There was an announcement on the front page of 3ABN's website
for many months. About 180,000 letters about Linda were sent to the mailing list at 3ABN. Videos about her were made and distributed. Magazine articles were written and submitted. Mailings were made to church officials. Many calls were taken at 3ABN where slanderous remarks about
Linda were given over the phone. Many letters containing completely false statements were sent to many individuals. Danny even made his personal email address available over 3ABN so people could write to him and obtain his side of the story. They did a thorough job of character assassination.

Now two years later the "trashing" continues. It is inexcusable, especially for a proclaimed Christian ministry.

In conclusion I want to clearly state that I have not committed adultery (emotional, physical, "spiritual"), and neither has Linda. The conversations we had were not unusual or inappropriate. Linda is the victim of domestic violence, only this has resulted in worldwide effects for our Church.

Linda has sought for help at the General Conference level. She has sought the aid of pastors. No one has an answer. She has tried repeatedly to meet with a committee from the Board of 3ABN. This request has not been granted. Still the bulk emails and letters flow from 3ABN slandering the innocent.

This has been the most ungodly situation I have observed in my entire life. Any who find themselves not in good graces with Danny Shelton will find that their name is discredited and slandered in an attempt to destroy their influence. Linda has suffered the most with the loss of her job, her
influence and reputation. But many others, including myself, have felt the heat coming from what is supposed to be a ministry representing Jesus Christ. This is an outrage. This is unacceptable. Accountability of leaders is a must. (Can bad fruits come from good trees?) As Christians, it
is our duty to demand accountability and a high standard from leaders. I hope this testimony will fulfill the mission intended.

Respectfully,

Dr. Arild Abrahamsen
 

« Last Edit: November 14, 2008, 07:26:22 AM by Artiste »
Logged
"Si me olvido de ti, oh Jerusalén, pierda mi diestra su destreza."

Daryl Fawcett

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2933
  • Daryl & Beth
    • Maritime SDA OnLine
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2008, 06:44:13 AM »

Artiste,

Did you quote those letters from a thread over at Maritime? :wave:

Johann

  • Guest
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2008, 07:00:16 AM »

That letter is available in many different places, and has been read widely. But some people forget or try to get people to forget it.
Logged

Fran

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 572
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2008, 10:01:31 AM »

Thank you Johann!  I was going to get these pinned items looked at again.

Does anything special stick out more now, than before? 

Do we see things in new light?

How did Danny plan to prove Dr. Arild Abrahamsen was here in the US when he was seeing patients at his clinic in Norway? 

Doctor's appointments are recorded.  Patient records are updated. 

Is it possible for Dr. Arild Abrahamsen to be in Florida and Norway caring for patients at the same time?

What are some thoughts about Document 100 and this letter?

Why would Danny say she went, and then say later say he foiled her plans to go?

Brenda was the one to put in the request for the ticket purchase.  She told Dee Hilderbrand to get them within 24 hours! 

She says in the telephone conversation (in 2008) that she did not go, but says that Linda definitely went to Florida with the doctor. 

What do you feel she was doing?

Did Danny forget to tell Brenda that he had foiled her plans after he claimed the trip was real? 

Or did Brenda know there was no trip, but lied?

Has everyone heard Brenda's whole telephone conversation?  I have heard it.  It is very sad indeed.
Logged

Snoopy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3056
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2008, 10:35:52 AM »

Why do you ask, Daryl?

Artiste,

Did you quote those letters from a thread over at Maritime? :wave:
Logged

Daryl Fawcett

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2933
  • Daryl & Beth
    • Maritime SDA OnLine
Re: Doc 100 Exhibits to follow
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2008, 12:11:55 PM »

Snoopy,

Since you asked, I asked as I noticed Artiste looking at the thread containing those letters over at Maritime about the time they were posted here.
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up