It would not be possible, or legally sound, for the Board to withdraw the lawsuite against Gailon Arthur Joy and Robert Pickle. Such a move would leave them open to
a claim for misuse of process and expose the lawfirm to liability.
They would have to negotiate a settlement with the defendants and that is possible but hardly in keeping with the objectives they laid out. After all, the lawsuite was clearly neccasary to try to eliminate or handi-cap the continued release of information and documentation supporting the allegations of misconduct, mis-management, poor stewardship of the officers and managers of 3ABN and a lack of proper oversight by the board of directors.
The chairman insists the lawsuite was to bring out the truth about what really happened, but even now they continue to block the production of documentation that is calculated to document our allegations, unless we agree to accept the premise that their documents are subject to impoundment under a confidentiality agreement. Hardly the kind of open and transparent spin they have repeatedly claimed and hardly designed to exonorate the officers and directors of 3ABN.
However, substantial changes to the 3ABN constitution and bylaws and the addition of a constituency, would go far toward acheiving oversight by the stockholders in the pews and certainly gain some accountability for future operations.
However, that will not cure or correct what is already done and there must be accountability for these issues that remain unresolved to this date. That process will require the intercession of the courts and since they have elected to go to court, we will remain in court for years to come.
Gailon Arthur Joy