Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Johann]

Yes, Stan, it is there. Post a few more times and you will have access.

[Stan]

Thanks...  will have to think of something to say..

[Johann]

Thanks...  will have to think of something to say..

At sundry times I have intgerpreted CA as Dlub Adventist, California, and Canada. Does all of this apply to you? Seems like you have moved around?

[Stan]

I have used that interchangeable at times.  My screen name on some technical sites is StanCA

[CRYSTAL]

Stan works in the BC Conference.

Stan takes any side just to antagonize and stir up the debate...

[Stan]

Really??

And who hides behind the name Chrystal?  Or is that your real name?

[Johann]

Just one more post, Stan, and you're in, unless someone has changed it.

[Stan]

Just one more?  That's it?

[Emma]

Have you checked to see if that is it, Stan ?

[Stan]

Yes I can see that,  thanks!!  Just am having a time problem..

[CRYSTAL]

Danny: Does 3ABN encourage men to leave their wives if they are not satisfied or not getting along with them? Does 3ABN encourage divorce for grounds that are not Biblical?

[inga]

I haven't visited AT for a long time, but Johann just told me that Stan was posting here. So I thought I'd take a look. And this is one post I absolutely have to respond to!

Stan works in the BC Conference.

Stan takes any side just to antagonize and stir up the debate...

Yes, Stan works in the BC Conference, so far, so good ..

But you really don't know Stan if you say that Stan does anything "just to antagonize"!

To me it looks more like Stan is loyal to his friends and prefers to think the best of them -- putting the best interpretation on any actions that could be interpreted one way or another. (It's probably something we should all  practice.)

I believe Stan considers Dan Shelton a friend. He also said he liked Linda. There's just one little problem -- and that is if you choose to believe all that Dan said about Linda, it's not putting the best interpretation on her actions. So sometimes one has to make choices of whom to believe.

[tinka]

There's just one little problem -- and that is if you choose to believe all that Dan said about Linda, it's not putting the best interpretation on her actions. So sometimes one has to make choices of whom to believe.

That is why you do not believe heresay ever. Just the facts proven beyond a shadow of doubt. The American way.  The rest is just what ever you like to hear best....on what ever or where ever the green is growing or looking better. So far unless deceitful, Stan seems to be right up front. I am not reading any arrogance in his posting at all like some. In fact I sorta got a feeling of a peacemaker. Who knows maybe wrong again.......

Well, looks like I did not do it right again on the quote.


Edit note:  I fixed it for you, tinka.  You were close!  Somehow you only had  "[quo" at the beginning of the quote so the software didn't recognize it as a quote.  Hope that helps...   

[inga]

There's just one little problem -- and that is if you choose to believe all that Dan said about Linda, it's not putting the best interpretation on her actions. So sometimes one has to make choices of whom to believe.

That is why you do not believe heresay ever. Just the facts proven beyond a shadow of doubt. The American way. 

That means, of course, that we don't believe any of the things the 3ABN board has implied about Linda nor the nasty things Dan has written about Linda (no hearsay, they're documented in emails) nor the nasty things others have written/implied about Linda here.

Suits me fine.

Of course, that also means that most posts on this board shouldn't be here. Only the factual evidence should remain, preferably without interpretive comment. You know, facts such as that Dan Shelton divorced his wife without biblical reason and took up with a younger model not so much later, boasting how much "prettier" she was than Linda. (documented) And that while he himself clearly and  publicly did not live according to the Ten Commandments, he felt free to author a book on the subject and preach on the subject.

That reminds me a bit of a certain religious sect in Christ's day.

And all the while, Linda is still single... Makes one think. .. 

But there really is not a lot to discuss, is there?

[tinka]

Inga,

So what do you see?? You see facts, as most people do not go around with blinders on to see that Extravaganza was obvious, and so is adultery! As everyone can see the results of total mess. Since when does not one sin spread its fingers into all situations and directions. Can anyone deny this has happened?   This is not one of the accidental sins to be sort of hid. This all was intentional deliberate sin, weak, no discipline, false sermons and false yak on 3abn while all behind the scenes, they were just countin the money. This may be what you call surmising but the rash all came out for the visible disease to see. or has this just been a dream of a nightmare. Has anyone fooled theirselves this would always be hid and just keep shelveling the goods to the perp. I know that Washington felt they can get away too with most Ignorant people in America. Lets just see how ignorant most America really is. Maybe they will stand again as they discover they have been robbed too.  Although EGW says just before the coming nothing will be stable. Could he by chance start with his own people??  I think so.   

Thank you again Snoopy for fixing, I have to be more careful and see now how I make the mistake. Thanks