Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Emma]

Fran, I think we all want to avoid comments that could damage specific children.

That is a different matter to discussing behaviour of certain adults which could cause harm to any children.

I recognise that you were not trying to hurt any of those mentioned.

[CRYSTAL]

In this member's opinion, when a member makes posts involving children and tarnishing their reputations with uninfomed, accusatory comments, then that calls for revoking a membership.

More information could be forthcoming if this could be accomplished...

[Emma]

Crystal, you are bringing up things that already have been dealt with.

We agreed the children should not be named, and their names were removed.   I do not think the poster made any comments accusing any children of inappropriate behaviour.

What you choose to do, do - if you do not want to make any further information available unless certain conditions are met, that is up to you.

Personally I am not very impressed at the threat of blackmail in any form.  Maybe that is just me.

(And please be aware that I have absolutely no axe to grind in the whole 3ABN saga.  I have no first hand knowledge and I am certainly not sitting here
with my tongue hanging out for more salacious tidbits.)

[princessdi]

Ok, I know I am late, but I was reading, posts here at AT, as I do from time to time.........Ian, how do you know all this stuff.......if you are not WT, TS, or anybody else directly involved in this?  Let me add that I know you aren't any of those people., and I am not challenging your facts  Just asking how do you know, mostly out of curiosity? 

Nope. Not only Walt Thompson, but NO ONE from 3ABN has ever contacted me to get my side of the story. The only contact with me ever attempted was two calls from a member of the Shelton family when it became apparent I was going to go public. I didn't answer either call.

But Duane, how can people contact you when you won't answer the phone? and how can this be? No one from 3abn contacted you? But you emaile Tommy Shelton yourself, didn't you? and he contacted you back, and again apologized and explained why you two couldn't be alone together anymore, and offered to help you in any way other than that, along with his wife and you wrote him back and said there was nothing to apologize for, and he had never hurt you and saying you didn't need help nor counseling, as he had needed and undergone, right?

So, with the letters you wrote how is it possible they could they not already have your side of the story?



 I don't get it.

[CRYSTAL]

It's interesting, and kind of disgusting how these young women in their 20's & 30's get matched up and married to these old men in their late fifties & sixties... I mean, are they just desperate & needful of funds? What young lady would want an old man with hair implants, dyed hair & scalp, loose & wrinkly skin and old, well... goes without saying. ? What do these old guys want to do? Evangelize them?

Abraham did that & we're still paying the price.

[Bob Pickle]

It's going on three years since a physician went public with his determination that Danny is a psychopath. And that was more than two years after Danny admitted that the physician had determined that.

So why not?

[Mary Sue Smith]

...and who is the physician who thinks this?

Arild - Linda's boyfriend. 

 

[Fran]

I believe he has real live credentials.  What do you have?

...and who is the physician who thinks this?

Arild - Linda's boyfriend. 

 

[Daryl Fawcett]

Junebug,

This type of a post from you is a disappointment to me, as I thought you were better than that.

...and who is the physician who thinks this?

Arild - Linda's boyfriend. 

 

[Fran]

I think she is the opposition junebug.  There are several here.  Have to watch the names really close or they will fool you by doing this too! 

[CRYSTAL]

Ask Danny if he remembers a young Brazilian girl named 'Betsy'?

[Sam]

Yes, Danny's been asked to get a paternity test.

What I wonder is if he has ever been asked to have a psychological evaluation done. Too many have felt he is a psychopath. It would clear the air a bit it he had a proper evaluation done and made a full disclosure of the procedure of the evaluation and its results.

Even better, it would be wise of him to ensure that the evaluator was not biased toward him in any way.

Do you have any idea how unprofessional this makes you sound?  No competent evaluator would agree to do an examination in this situation.

Bob, Bob.....I know it's hard to get your story straight coming from Linda and Daryl but let's try shall we?

1. Danny was not ask to take a paternity test.  Danny volunteered to do so after someone (who has been speaking closely with Linda) made an unfounded accusation.  The whole accusation was so ridiculous that DS was thrilled to suggest DNA testing as this is one of the more simple things that he can prove quick and fast. He and the "accuser" have agreed to certain stipulations that will be enforced.  The accuser is supposedly making the arrangements for testing and should this person back out of the agreement, I will be happy to share their identity and the proof that it was Danny's suggestion...not anyone else's.

[Bob Pickle]

Thanks for the clarification, Sam, though it doesn't seem to make much difference.

Plus, if the source of your info is Danny, remember, Danny is the one who said that he could prove that Linda's Toyota Sequoia is titled in his name too, when the title as faxed from the lending bank never had Danny's name on it. And rather than explain the discrepancy when I asked him about it, or rather than apologizing for getting it wrong, Danny did the unspeakable, suing me for raising the question.

Yes, Danny had the nerve of putting that issue into the lawsuit after refusing to explain the matter. The gall! At his age you would think he would be more mature than that.

Now you mention stipulations. What stipulations? Is Danny still playing his little games?

[Sam]

Thanks for the clarification, Sam, though it doesn't seem to make much difference.

Plus, if the source of your info is Danny, remember, Danny is the one who said that he could prove that Linda's Toyota Sequoia is titled in his name too, when the title as faxed from the lending bank never had Danny's name on it. And rather than explain the discrepancy when I asked him about it, or rather than apologizing for getting it wrong, Danny did the unspeakable, suing me for raising the question.

Yes, Danny had the nerve of putting that issue into the lawsuit after refusing to explain the matter. The gall! At his age you would think he would be more mature than that.

Now you mention stipulations. What stipulations? Is Danny still playing his little games?

Oh Bob...it makes a difference or you wouldn't have phrased it the way you did. Remember Bob if your info came from Linda or Daryl M. they have "mislead" you (and that's putting it kindly) on many other issues. Obviously they mislead you on this one since you stated "Danny was asked to take a DNA test".  That was wrong. Did they tell it to you like that or was that your own twist on words?

Danny sued you for a raising a question?  Hilarious Bob. Your twists quit being twists long ago and are blatant lies.

Twisting/lying again Bob on your last question?  I said that Danny agreed to meet the accuser's stipulations. Somehow you tried to turn that around that Danny was making the stipulations.  So funny it's sad. Not working Bob.

[Fran]

Ask Danny if he remembers a young Brazilian girl named 'Betsy'?