You are presuming there was any validity to their malicious claim...it had no foundation at bar, given the current caselaw and so their "trademark infringement" claim was yet another fictional allegation. Proof prima Facie was the fact that they never filed a motion for temporary injunction, obviously expected right out of the gate, but which never came. Of course they knew we were prepared for that one and never launched their sure to fail effort!!!
For us, the claim gave us assured Federal Jurisdiction, closing the door to a rule 81 conversion to a State law claim in Illinois. Eventually, it would have suffered severe fatality upon a dispositive motion strategically made.
Therefore, 3ABNTalk is not known to be a commercial enterprise and shows all the characteristics of the 3ABN Founder pefectly and so suits me to have it exist, and since it does not violate any REAL TRADEMARK statute, let it be...besides loads of good information surfaces there, not the least of which is proof of conspiracy and seriously vicious defamation worthy of Danny Lee Shelton / 3ABN supporters. They continue to serve a very valuable role as propagators of the DLS business interests in 3ABn and we trust they keep up the fine job!!!
Besides, where would Bonnie have to go to vent her venom if they did not exist?
Personally, I feel there is way too much speech suppression at Adventtalk and while administrative moderators find some of the banter "troubling", I find it informative and opportunistic.
It is clear their needs to be another news reporting sight that states the findings and the history and perhaps allows blog responses for the victims to vent their venom to the news stories, as I am sure there will be vigorous disagreement with at least some of the content.
I do find their curiosity regarding Adventtalk and other sights and forums profound!!! They are so use to working with and supporting liars, they have little choice but to assume that Adventtalk does the same!!!
One must wonder the reason for thier profound curiosity...it is clear they believe I am behind them all and I leave them to their fatal conclusions as I do not know, and do not want to know, the facts!!!
I was surprised to find that Daryl resigned!!! And only found that out from reading 3ABNTalk. (I assume by deduction that it is correct, right?) What a good source of information!!! Too bad it was not all the truth!!!
As far as I am concerned, the more the merrier!!! And the more "infringing" the happier I am!!!
I would like to "infringe" on Brenda Walsh and suppose I shall have to soon enough!!! Think they will do us a big favor and open a BrendaWalshTalk.com sight?
Maybe Crystal and Brenda could share and compare notes!!!
Gailon Arthur Joy
Gailon, I'm glad you brought up the other forums because I have a question. Didn't Danny and 3ABN sue you and Bob for trademark infringement regarding your use of "3ABN" in www.save3ABN.com? By the same argument, wouldn't Danny and 3ABN take issue with any site that use "3ABN" in their name?
If Crystal were really Crystal, then Crystal would have enough information having sufficient value that the National Enquirer would pay handsomely for the story and we could all read the details with dates, times and places on the newstands.
The best part is the grand finale with the car on the front lawn!!!
Crystal, do you need a contact person at the National Enquirer? I'm just not sure this is the correct forum for a tell-all with Grandma Nettie and Bonnie, the ever present watchful eyes, amongst other tender eyes, waiting with baited breathe.
Besides, the litigation resulting would have to come right back to Massachussets US District Court, Central Division, per order of the court, and we need a couple more weeks to get our motions in and heard. Could you at least wait a month or two before satisfying the curiosity of these "dis-interested" Adventist Media watchers? Or perhaps you could post it over on BSDA where they "REALLY" don't care!!! And don't forget the 3ABNTALK option!!!
Gailon Arthur Joy