In recording and airing these high school girls sports games on satellite, maybe the Director thought that by providing exposure of someone's athleticism, that would entitle him to some reward.
So now you are taking the story up a notch by inferring that there was a specific athlete that the Director had designs on. Yet, you have not given any basic facts to those here who don't know the situation.
Without supporting facts, your motivation still appears to be attempting to create provocative speculation about the Director's actions, and now even the motivation behind them. Yesterday, a poster said the following to Bonnie:
"oh so now you know what motivated CRYSTAL to post what she did? Have you crawled into her brain? huge lol! I don't think so!!"
With a few changes, that statement better applies to your posts, IMO:
"oh so now you know what motivated the Director to do what he did? Have you crawled into his brain? huge lol! I don't think so!!"
Are you going to continue to titillate the audience with inferences or do you have something real to report?