Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Snoopy]

Please do expound, Gregory!  So you telling me that Lucinda Dawn Randall is presently litigating Social Security disability cases?  I wonder what the Dayton Bar Association would think of that??  Here is their number (937) 222-7902.  Anybody care to call and check?  GrandmaNettie??  You're always a great one to go after the truth!  Maybe you could make a call and report back to us! 

***********************************************

High court suspends Spring Valley attorney's license
By Lou Grieco

Staff Writer

Thursday, June 12, 2008

DAYTON — The Ohio Supreme Court indefinitely suspended Thursday, June 12, the law license of a Spring Valley attorney.

Lucinda D. Randall was suspended for abandoning the cases of eight clients who had retained her to represent them in Social Security benefits appeals, and the cases of four other clients she agreed to represent in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.

ExtrasThe court found that Randall's conduct violated discipline rules that prohibit neglect of entrusted client legal matters, conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and conduct that reflects adversely on an attorney's fitness to practice law.

Because Randall failed to answer the complaint against her or to respond to repeated efforts by the Dayton Bar Association and Board of Commissioners on Grievances & Discipline to communicate with her, she also was found to be in violation of the state bar governance rule that requires an attorney to cooperate with disciplinary proceedings, the court found.


http://www.daytondailynews.com/n/content/oh/story/news/local/2008/06/12/ddn061208attorneyweb.html

Snoopy said:

And, how can it be that she "presently litigates Social Security disability cases"?  Did she tell you that?  Did someone forget to tell her that her license is suspended?  Am I just missing something?

Yes, you are missing something.  You lack a basic understanding of the law, legal affairs and what people can and can not do.

[Snoopy]

    Still laughing!!

Sorry to rain on your parade, but I don't feel the need to defend myself at the expense of others!  What I do feel is the need to beat you people at your own little games!!

Like Snoopy feels the need to defend herself at the expense of others?

It looks to me like he is responding as he and Cindi Randall have been attacked repeatedly here, and do need defending but explaining that they cannot do so without dragging in Linda and others, and they prefer not to do that, snoopy included. That is commendable and certainly rare here imo.

[Buttercup Roberts]

Yup - just like Ian!!  The similarities are remarkable!

Hmmmm.  Perhaps Michael Kopper could weigh in on similarities...

[Snoopy]

Well this is very enlightening!  You must lead a very boring life if all you have to do is check people out on the internet!  Do you do this for everyone you don't like?  Or am I just special??

Why don't you tell us exactly what you found on the internet??  Do you happen to get the WHOLE story?  Or just bits and pieces that you wanted to find in an effort to smear me like you do everyone else who stands for truth?

That premise may suit your mindset, but it is not obvious to me.

I, myself know alot about you and your checkered history and
never asked or received any confidences from this woman you are bent on exposing and attacking.

I actually got it all from the internet, based on your public posts and emails.

After all you told us your name, occupation, and history, and even places you have lived and been.

For example; there was that letter you posted saying you were in Nashville. I googled the courts there and just entered your name.

And, how can it be that she "presently litigates Social Security disability cases"?  Did she tell you that?  Did someone forget to tell her that her license is suspended?  Am I just missing something?

Did you ever consider giving "your former friend" the benefit of the doubt, or of asking her that before attempting to publicly humiliate and attack her on this forum?

It seems to me that one should get all the facts,and ask questions privately and hear all before jumping to conclusions or developing obsessions involving pay backs and revenge for perceived wrongs.

It  also seems to me that you are exposing far more about yourself and your character here then you are others.

IMO, you outed yourself and you are continuing to do so, and are your own worst enemy.

I would venture to say outside of the little fan club you have going here, most others are turned off and disgusted by your display here.

I know I am.

Let me be very clear:

Cindi and  I did not attempt to influence Linda's legal decisions.

On numerous occasions both Cindi and I would tell Linda that she needed to seek the advice of a comptent attorney in regard to decisions that she  needed to make.

As part of that Linda was advised that she should seek the advice of lawyers who worked in the areas of law that related to the legal issues that Linda faced.  Cindi has spent her life in the practice of Social Security law.  She presently litigates Social Security disability cases in hearings where such cases are decided. She has never specialized in the specific areas where Linda had to make legal decisions.  Linda was repeatedly told to seek advice from atornies who specialized in areas of law related to the legal issues that she faced.

A number of years ago, when Linda informed me that she was without legal counsel, I gave her some advice as to how to select counsel to represent her.  I then illustrated my advice with the specific mention of three different law firms that I thought it would be worth her time to meet with and discuss the posibility of representing her (Linda) on a specific issue.  Linda contacted those law firms and ended up selecting an attorney that was not a part of the three that I had mentioned to her.  That was the last time that I ever mentioned a specific law firm or attorney to represent her.  She now understood the issues that I had mentioned to her and she was quite capable of acting on her own.  In every case, from that time on, she selected her own lawyers to represent her without any specific input from either Cindi or I.

Influence Linda on specifc legal issues:  No. 

I doubt that Snoppy has any personal knowledge of advice that we gave Linda.

Yes, we could defend ourselves (Cindi and I).  We could do so by puting out for public view personal information about Linda.  We are not prevented from doing so by any profesonal confidentiality concerns.  Such simply do not exist.

So, why have we not published for the world to see such information that would defend us?   Because we care about Linda.  We want her to get on with her life and celebrate as we see her doing so.  We do not want to embarrass Linda.  In addition, our defense of ourselves would embarrass people other than Linda. 
This is not what we want to do. 

[/quote]

[bonnie]

Well this is very enlightening!  You must lead a very boring life if all you have to do is check people out on the internet!  Do you do this for everyone you don't like?  Or am I just special??

Why don't you tell us exactly what you found on the internet??  Do you happen to get the WHOLE story?  Or just bits and pieces that you wanted to find in an effort to smear me like you do everyone else who stands for truth?

snoopy,
You have provided the information about yourself for the most part. I am not exactly sure why except as a method to spring from that to what you have since posted about others that disagree with you.
If someone else outed you I missed the post that did so.
Just sit back and watch what has actually happened to this forum and the lives of others because of 4 people primarily.

It would be well for both sides to take a long unbiased(as far as possible) look at what they are defending and smearing others for.

Most that defend 3ABN really need to consider the likely reasons for 3ABN wanting to end the lawsuit. I don't think it takes a legal genius to believe it was the most prudent to do so and hopefully avoid more embarrassing revelations. His supporters are accused of being clones.

The same thing holds true for the Bob and Gailon supporters. Have you put, let say Bob under the same scrutiny and accusations made about others. His personal life and how it may tie to certain conduct in this? Does the fact that he is no longer an elder indicate just a desire to no longer serve in that capacity or is it something other than that?
Is there a reason that he never received his credentials as pastor? These questions if asked of the side that is seen as supporting DS would be asked again and again.


 Many times someone's personal life should be just that. In this it doesn't work. DS personal life has been dissected and sliced and diced every which way. Because it does have a bearing on what he professes and claims to be about.
Bob and Gailon's personal life also has a bearing on conduct exhibited here.
Bob will ask many questions and make accusations about any and all connected to 3ABN.

 He refuses to answer specific questions to him. Why?? Does the answer come a bit to close to home? Has he this righteous mandate to win no matter what it takes?

The rightness or righteousness of a cause can be determined by the methodology.
To those that would follow Bob and Gailon over the cliff might need to think about that and take a second look..

 Those that wholeheartedly support DS may also want a good close look again before they follow  him over the cliff.

.








edited to remove duplicate sentence

[Snoopy]

LOL!  No problem, bonnie!!  It is easy to miss what someone else has to say if you are always the one talking!!  Yes, I have provided information about myself, because once I learned the tactics of some of those I have confided in I knew it was only a matter of time before they would use anything they could find to try to intimidate and discredit me!  I predicted it over a week ago, and I was right. 

snoopy,
You have provided the information about yourself for the most part. I am not exactly sure why except as a method to spring from that to what you have since posted about others that disagree with you.
If someone else outed you I missed the post that did so.
Just sit back and watch what has actually happened to this forum and the lives of others because of 4 people primarily.

It would be well for both sides to take a long unbiased(as far as possible) look at what they are defending and smearing others for.

Most that defend 3ABN really need to consider the likely reasons for 3ABN wanting to end the lawsuit. I don't think it takes a legal genius to believe it was the most prudent to do so and hopefully avoid more embarrassing revelations. His supporters are accused of being clones.

The same thing holds true for the Bob and Gailon supporters. Have you put, let say Bob under the same scrutiny and accusations made about others. His personal life and how it may tie to certain conduct in this? Does the fact that he is no longer an elder indicate just a desire to no longer serve in that capacity or is it something other than that?
Is there a reason that he never received his credentials as pastor? These questions if asked of the side that is seen as supporting DS would be asked again and again.


 Many times someone's personal life should be just that. In this it doesn't work. DS personal life has been dissected and sliced and diced every which way. Because it does have a bearing on what he professes and claims to be about.
Bob and Gailon's personal life also has a bearing on conduct exhibited here.
Bob will ask many questions and make accusations about any and all connected to 3ABN.

 He refuses to answer specific questions to him. Why?? Does the answer come a bit to close to home? Has he this righteous mandate to win no matter what it takes?

The rightness or righteousness of a cause can be determined by the methodology.
To those that would follow Bob and Gailon over the cliff might need to think about that and take a second look..

 Those that wholeheartedly support DS may also want a good close look again before they follow  him over the cliff.

.








edited to remove duplicate sentence

[bonnie]

LOL!  No problem, bonnie!!  It is easy to miss what someone else has to say if you are always the one talking!!  Yes, I have provided information about myself, because once I learned the tactics of some of those I have confided in I knew it was only a matter of time before they would use anything they could find to try to intimidate and discredit me!  I predicted it over a week ago, and I was right

. 


Are you saying that just became a fear now?? This has been going on for a longtime.
In any event it seems like it was used t excuse your behaviour and have it once again be everyone's fault but yours?

[Snoopy]

Are you saying you don't read well?

Are you saying that just became a fear now?? This has been going on for a longtime.
In any event it seems like it was used t excuse your behaviour and have it once again be everyone's fault but yours?

[Snoopy]

By the way bonnie...who was the attorney who handled your son's case?

[Habanero]

LOL!  No problem, bonnie!!  It is easy to miss what someone else has to say if you are always the one talking!!  Yes, I have provided information about myself, because once I learned the tactics of some of those I have confided in I knew it was only a matter of time before they would use anything they could find to try to intimidate and discredit me!  I predicted it over a week ago, and I was right

. 


Are you saying that just became a fear now?? This has been going on for a longtime.
In any event it seems like it was used t excuse your behaviour and have it once again be everyone's fault but yours?

Huh? Maybe it is just because I am a man, but I am not getting this at all. What has just become a longtime fear and behavioural excuse, and the fault issues and such? This is one of those conversations that just baffles me.

[bonnie]

By the way bonnie...who was the attorney who handled your son's case?

I should tell you, there isn't any reason not to. But as my son  case doesn't have any bearing on outing anyone I will let you find it

As it was well publicized it has been read by many

[bonnie]

Huh? Maybe it is just because I am a man, but I am not getting this at all. What has just become a longtime fear and behavioural excuse, and the fault issues and such? This is one of those conversations that just baffles me.

Snoopy outed herself because she feared "others" would do so and she wanted to get it out there first. What is the big fear now. If others that she no longer considers friend has had this information and have not put it out there,why the big hizzy fit now

[bonnie]

By the way bonnie...who was the attorney who handled your son's case?

I just remembered,your dear friend Bob knows,ask him if it is important

[Snoopy]

I believe I was mistaken with this comparison.

Yup - just like Ian!!  The similarities are remarkable!

[Snoopy]

LOL!  Naw - not really important.  But since you've posted just about everything else here related to your son's case I figured I would just ask so I would know who NOT to recommend to someone in Minnesota looking for a lawyer.  That's all - no big deal.

By the way bonnie...who was the attorney who handled your son's case?

I should tell you, there isn't any reason not to. But as my son  case doesn't have any bearing on outing anyone I will let you find it

As it was well publicized it has been read by many