Don't kid yourself, Gregory. Cindi has obviously been talking about things I have told her in confidence.
That premise may suit your mindset, but it is not obvious to me.
I, myself know alot about you and your checkered history and
never asked or received any confidences from this woman you are bent on exposing and attacking.
I actually got it all from the internet, based on your public posts and emails.
After all you told us your name, occupation, and history, and even places you have lived and been.
For example; there was that letter you posted saying you were in Nashville. I googled the courts there and just entered your name.
And, how can it be that she "presently litigates Social Security disability cases"? Did she tell you that? Did someone forget to tell her that her license is suspended? Am I just missing something?
Did you ever consider giving "your former friend" the benefit of the doubt, or of asking her that before attempting to publicly humiliate and attack her on this forum?
It seems to me that one should get all the facts,and ask questions privately and hear all before jumping to conclusions or developing obsessions involving pay backs and revenge for perceived wrongs.
It also seems to me that you are exposing far more about yourself and your character here then you are others.
IMO, you outed yourself and you are continuing to do so, and are your own worst enemy.
I would venture to say outside of the little fan club you have going here, most others are turned off and disgusted by your display here.
I know I am.
Let me be very clear:
Cindi and I did not attempt to influence Linda's legal decisions.
On numerous occasions both Cindi and I would tell Linda that she needed to seek the advice of a comptent attorney in regard to decisions that she needed to make.
As part of that Linda was advised that she should seek the advice of lawyers who worked in the areas of law that related to the legal issues that Linda faced. Cindi has spent her life in the practice of Social Security law. She presently litigates Social Security disability cases in hearings where such cases are decided. She has never specialized in the specific areas where Linda had to make legal decisions. Linda was repeatedly told to seek advice from atornies who specialized in areas of law related to the legal issues that she faced.
A number of years ago, when Linda informed me that she was without legal counsel, I gave her some advice as to how to select counsel to represent her. I then illustrated my advice with the specific mention of three different law firms that I thought it would be worth her time to meet with and discuss the posibility of representing her (Linda) on a specific issue. Linda contacted those law firms and ended up selecting an attorney that was not a part of the three that I had mentioned to her. That was the last time that I ever mentioned a specific law firm or attorney to represent her. She now understood the issues that I had mentioned to her and she was quite capable of acting on her own. In every case, from that time on, she selected her own lawyers to represent her without any specific input from either Cindi or I.
Influence Linda on specifc legal issues: No.
I doubt that Snoppy has any personal knowledge of advice that we gave Linda.
Yes, we could defend ourselves (Cindi and I). We could do so by puting out for public view personal information about Linda. We are not prevented from doing so by any profesonal confidentiality concerns. Such simply do not exist.
So, why have we not published for the world to see such information that would defend us? Because we care about Linda. We want her to get on with her life and celebrate as we see her doing so. We do not want to embarrass Linda. In addition, our defense of ourselves would embarrass people other than Linda.
This is not what we want to do.
[/quote]