That change was only for the 3ABN forum at the time because we could no longer babysit everyone. Both sides were just childish with their campaigns to identify the other side. It was still not allowed ares of the site. It was like th wild, wild west in there with one person doing something to another member, and then reporting someone for doing that same thing to them. PMs to the Admins, and especially Calvin just flying about who thought they were wronged that day. Accusing us of being biased by both sides if we didn't side with them that day. Working hard and making insinuations about who the opponent my be, where they live, go to church, etc., while fiercely clinging to their right to protect that same information about themselves, also posting annonymously. It was just crazy, and so unchristian in was just plain scary. I, for one, still believe it to be wrong, and I can only speak for Diane. One's preferences should just be respected, simple.
As I siad Bob one more time, I will not argue with you. This is the danger is the path you have taken in that even your basic judgement is skewed. You are right, though, it was GJ post that I first read about Cindy being identified. You just cosigned in your post.
I'm sorry, guys, I will just always see things different for a variety of reasons. Number one being my relationship with God and if this would be an affront to him to offend one of His Children is such a way, and I am impressed that it would.